Something I learned today

Thank you very much for that explanation.

This particular pastor, used to be my pastor years ago and back then, he somewhat encouraged me to use the NKJV, but I declined.

I never held it against him then or now; But that clearly is the difference in the verse.
---------------------
My record is clear for the past few years that I have been here; I have never criticized anyone for whatever Bible they used: I never called any Bible a work of Satan.........
In short, all the terrible things that have been said about me in this thread, are untrue.
(My posts here, speak for themselves.)
------------------------------------
My only qualm is with Bibles that remove words, or cast doubt on them.
For instance, the last passage in Mark 16:....

This verses stayed in the Bible for over 300 years(before the KJB), yet W&H can declare that they might not should be their, and poof.....doubt is cast on them.
-----------------------------------
Then point being made in this threadThe thing that I learned), is....“Why I am so stubborn, when it comes to the words of the Bible”!

And that is because, I don’t want to loose faith in God’s Word.
-----------------------------------

 

The question being addressed here is, can the MV’s be “inferior”, and Satan not be directly responsible?
----------------------
I admit that I did “imply” that the MV’s were a work of Satan, but that is not what I meant.

Sure enough the MV’s are “the Bible”(which I have said before), but even though they remove a lot of verses that I believe should have been left in, they can and do still minister to people’s lives.
----------------------
With that said; Earlier I was asked.....
“So you want all new Bibles to have the same words as old Bibles have”?

And of course I said YES! Does anybody want a Bible that has verses removed?
------------------------
So the question comes down to the fact, that some real smart people today, tell us that new scrolls tells us, that those verses should be removed.

Okey..... I just don’t understand.
(1)We had God’s Word for hundreds of years(from 100 AD):
(2)Then you have the dark agesa bad time but God’s Word was preserved
(3)Then later on, the printing press is invented and Oh boy, wonderful things start happening.
(4)And God’s people trust it and the more it is reproduced in more and more languages, the better things get: (more and more people getting saved)
(5)Then in 1881, W&H, put a stop to that; Sure enough the Bible is still being published, but now we are told, that we can't be sure that it’s all their.
-----------------------------------
I have many friends & acquaintances in the ministry, who once were men of faith, who believed the Bible the same way I do.
But in the last 20 years or so, they have been dropping like flies.

Oh, they are still in the ministry, but if you to read their doctrinal statement, and come to the part about the Bible, they say(without apology),....“The Bible is 95% true”.

Now I know why they say this, because for years in the ministry I have been under the same pressure as they have been; The pressure to please or impress men and just get along by repeating the “party line”.

This is what Jesus had to say about that.......
John 12:43
“For they loved the praise of men more than the praise of God.”

 

In my copy of Strong’s concordance, he shows the first GK. word in Verse 2 is.....
3361. mh me may;
a primary particle of qualified negation (whereas 3756 expresses an absolute denial); (adverbially) not, (conjunctionally) lest; also (as an interrogative implying a negative answer [whereas 3756 expects an affirmative one]) whether:

any but (that), X forbear, + God forbid, + lack, lest, neither, never, no (X wise in), none, nor, [can-]not, nothing, that not, un[-taken], without. Often used in compounds in substantially the same relations.
See also 3362, 3363, 3364, 3372, 3373, 3375, 3378.
-----------
I don’t know: Maybe this word is removed in the CT?