Stupid KJVO tricks.

Man, if we were to catalog all the tricks, double speak, and loaded questions the KJVO use, we'd ocerload the servers!

Just another example of willful ignorance.

Sad.

In Christ,
Trotter

 

Amen, Brother Trotter -- Preach it!

Recall this topic here at Baptist Board?

Ed's Catalogue of KJVO Doubles

 

Stupid Alexandrian "sect" tricks:

1."bibles" from mss. compiled by Gnostics and Philosophers from Alexadria,Egypt are the word of God."

2".All "bibles" are equally the word of God."

3."Inspiration applies ONLY to the original autographs."


4."Erasmus had only a few late middle age MSS. to work with."


5."There was no Textus Receptus untill 1633"


6."No translation is inspired."


7."People criticized the KJB when it was introduced,therefore the nasb,niv,rsv,ect.,are just as good."


8."Many nations did not have a KJB before 1700:What did they do!?"

9."Your worshiping a Book."


10."The 'oldest and best' texts read........A better reading would be......"


11."The KJB is confusing and difficult to understand and causes 'cults and sects'."


12."Where was the word of God before 1611?"


This is just a small amount of the most aped "STUPID Alexandrian tricks" from the world's oldest "sect"..

 

Anti-Alexandrian you should have discussed what preceded the Greek manuscripts? You didn't mention anything about that.

 

Interesting, you have different groups
of MV users all mixed and confused together.
Remember, God is not the author of confusion
(us MV users can missquote scritpure also )


the Inerrancy rational Poll

FIRST: 44% - #3. The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs 44% (41)

SECOND: 23% - #1 The Bible is inerrant on all doctrinal issues 12% (11)
#2 The Bible is inerrant on all issues: doctrinal, historic, and scientific 11% (10)

THIRD: 11 % - #10 The Bible is inerrant in all English translations 11% (10)
LAST: KJVO

You appear to be surrounded by MV users
and are lashing out in all directions.

Here, let me help you get organized.
BTW, it is also unfair to call all these
groups by your last name
BTW, you spelled "your" when you should
have spelled "you're".

 

It get sad when we have to hire a MV user
to help the KJVO figure out how to present
their arugment

Stupid Alexandrian "sect"ONE tricks:
(autograph only inerrant):

3."Inspiration applies ONLY to the original autographs."
6."No translation is inspired."
9."Your worshiping a Book."
11."The KJB is confusing and difficult to understand and causes 'cults and sects'."


Stupid Alexandrian "sect"TWO tricks:
(all KJVs are inerrant)

1."bibles" from mss. compiled by Gnostics and Philosophers from Alexadria,Egypt are the word of God."
8."Many nations did not have a KJB before 1700:What did they do!?"
12."Where was the word of God before 1611?"


Stupid Alexandrian "sect"THREE tricks:
(all MVs are inerrant)

2".All "bibles" are equally the word of God."
4."Erasmus had only a few late middle age MSS. to work with."
5."There was no Textus Receptus untill 1633"
7."People criticized the KJB when it was introduced,therefore the nasb,niv,rsv,ect.,are just as good."
10."The 'oldest and best' texts read.....A better reading would be....

 

How about this for stupid "Alexandrian tricks".

1) Saying that a Bible is 100% inspired and "word perfect", but only after you get rid of one entire section out of three.

2) Continuing to print these uninspired books as if they are part of scripture all the way through the 1850's as the majority of printings of the translation that you think is word-for-word inspired.

3) Saying that the translators never intended for it to be considered as scripture when it is between the Old and New Testaments and not marked in any special way except the name of the section on the first page.

 

Gorsh, bro Phillip, you and i auto go
over to KJVO. They need our help bad ...

 

Well, you're right 'bout one thing...y'all do need help! hahaha (sorry, couldn't resist...tho't this was the game room)

 

Now you gotta laugh!!!!

Splain somthing to me there hot-shot,why are you aping the same old baloney and then not making mention of the FACT that the Apocrypha was in both testaments in the "oldest and best" unicals as inspired scripture?!?!?!?!

The Apocrypha was never in any reformation text..

You know this!!!

 

The Apocrypha was not accepted by the early church as canon, but was accepted by the RCC as such.

The KJV was translated by Anglican scholars, just a short step from the RCC.

Hmmm...is there some connection?

In Christ,
Trotter

 

Then why does it show up in every single KJV that I own that was printed in the 1700's and early 1800's. These are NOT Catholic Bibles, there is a difference in the order and way the books are named.

Every single KJV that I have either owned or reviewed between 1612 and 1850 contain the apocrypha as part of the scriptures with no designation that they are not part of the canon.

Do you consider the AV1611 a "reformation text"?

 

Cute Granny. You're on my list anyway ever since I found out you weren't even old enough to be my mother.

 

The sad part is that I honestly think we could do a better argument for them than they do for themselves.

 

12b. "Where was the [perfect]word of God [which we believe has never existed anyway] before 1611?"

Man what a poignant argument!

13. All Bibles are inspired. No translations are inspired.

I've heard better arguments coming from a bird out of the front of a clock

14. If it doesn't make sense TO ME, then it must be a bad translation.

15. King James was a QUEER! The translators were Baptist-killers. Westcott and Hort were Bible toting, soul-winning, holy-living, "really smart", saints of God!

16. KJVOers talk double speak. MVers can use the same tactics but have full diplomatic immunity because they are right.

17. Things that are very very very very slightly different are the same as things that are incredibly, enormously, exponentially different.

(Also known as: Because a '66 Corvette doesn't have original spark plugs, that means that a Yugo is a Corvette.)

18. KJVO's worship a book because they think the KJV is perfect. MVers DON'T worship a book because they think only the autographs were perfect. (autograph-olatry?)

19. KJVO's are responsible for Waco, Guiana, Ruby Ridge, the Oklahoma bombing, 911, WWII, and the Vietnam Conflict.

20. KJV-onlyism is divisive. Carpet color is not.

21. KJV-onlyist are foolish, heretical, divisive, ignorant, backward, idiotic, and its proponents are too subjective to debate properly!


This is fun!

Lacy

 

It's for h-i-s-t-o-r-i-c-a-l reference only,like Scofield's notes for example;neither did the KJB translators consider it scripture and neither was it in the reformation(Byzantine) texts..

 

Gee, Lacy, you're pretty good at this!

In Christ,
Trotter