Sunni group attacks al-Qaeda base

With all due respect, it will be you Republicans who are losing it big time come November 2008.

 

I suggest that the Democrats concentrate on health care, Social Security, and education.


Trust More on Issues
October 2007

Issue
Dems
GOPs
Net Dem Advtg.

Health Care
53%
32%
+21

Social Security
49%
33%
+16

Education
48%
35%
+13

Abortion
43%
35%
+8

Gov't Ethics &
Corruption
38%
30%
+8

Economy
46%
41%
+5

Taxes
45%
40%
+5

Immigration
41%
36%
+5

Iraq
45%
41%
+4

Nat'l Security/ War on Terror
41%
45%
-4

- www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/trust_on_issues__1/trust_on_issues

The Democrats even lead the Republicans on the Iraq War.

 

You mean "here" as in the BB?

If so, I have simply exercised my free speech right and posted my opinions. Do you think I shouldn't be allowed to express my opinions?

BTW, don't worry, I don't make policy for the Democratic Party, I'm just one voter.

 

No doubt about this. Of coursae the Democratic apologists on the board will continue to carry the water and spout the administered talking points as given by media matters and the coat tail rider. The Dems need bad news to survive and further their communist agenda.:thumbs:

 

It wouldn't do them any good. I will maintain my independence and remain a conservative.

As for the democrat party as a whole, no foreign power and no enemy could have done more to undermine the mission of our armed forces in Iraq.

Their actions and their words have been beyond despicable. I've seen their act before and it's just as despicable this time as it was the last time.

Words cannot express my total contempt for the democrat party.

 

The Democratic Party is pathetic. The only way they can win an election is the Republicans fail to lead, which is the only reason they have a chance in 2008. Harry Truman was the last Democratic President that was a true leader.

Back to the op. Ps104 is completely correct on this issue. It has nothing to do with how we got in Iraq, or the half truths that were reported. The fact is we are there. It is quite a refreshing change to see the Iraqis attacking the true enemy, Al Qaeda.

Why does everyone remain focused on George Bush and his past mistakes. He has one year left, yesterday's history. The best he can do is have a series of events like this to make conditions more likely for us to withdraw.

For those who think the Democrat elected next year will withdraw, get real. He or she will find it impossible if conditions are as now. Be glad this happened. Positive news for a change.

If as much time was spent on getting Giuliani and Romney defeated at the polls so we could have a conservative nominee, instead of worrying about George Bush, we would be much better off.

 

Not that I think KenH does talk out of both sides of his mouth, but speaking of:

(Bolding mine.) Gee... a compilation of such individuals doesn't exactly sound like prime candidates for governing a democracy, eh?

 

Wow, Carpro speechless....priceless!

This is how I feel about the Republican Party; I will do all I can do to see that we do not elect another one in my lifetime. Almost anyone else will do!

 

No, I don't. I was simply speaking about the poll results on various issues and there are three where the Democrats have a clear advantage over Republicans.

 

If you wish to be on the side of treasonous politicians, murderers of the unborn and the destruction of marriage, it's your choice.

And then there's the minor fact that democrats just absolutely cannot be trusted with national security. Again, your choice.

I'll raying: for you.

 

More Americans trust the Democrats on Iraq than they trust the Republicans.

Maybe you think that most Americans are treasonous in your view.

 

(Bolding mine.) I'm still wondering how Ps104_33 interpreted your neutral observation as an endorsement.

 

It's far more likely that I think you are just plainly wrong. Americans still distrust democrats more than Republicans when it comes to national security.

By continuing to call for our surrender when conditions have improved in Iraq, democrats appear to only be appealing to their radical base and playing politics, all to the detriment of the nation.

 

No, you are wrong. Rasmussen, who usually has the most favorable numbers for Republicans, showed that on Iraq more Americans trust the Democrats than the Republicans.

Sometimes you just have to belly up to the bar and accept reality, my friend.

 

I'm not talking about just Iraq.

 

Fine.

Rasmussen shows that the Republicans have a 4% lead in the War on Terrorism and that the Democrats have a 4% lead in the War in Iraq. So call it dead even on the War in Iraq/War on Terrorism scorecard.

That brings us to the domestic issues where the Democrats, according to Rasmussen, are blowing the Republicans out of the water.

 

National security involves much more than the War in Iraq.

It's not even at all.

It brings you to domestic issues, not me. Everyone knows exactly what democrats will do as soon as they can...raise taxes...enormously.
Everything they propose is tied to that.

The swing of the pendulum will reverse their excesses in due time. But the people that die because democrats are weak on national security cannot be brought back to life.

 

You are not the average voter. That is why your party will be thrashed in the voting in November 2008.

 

Just wait and see who our next president is! Bet you it's a democrat, thank God!