Featured Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Makes The Case For Killing Poor Children

There you go again! Still trying to justify your third person idea?

1. I - we
2. you - you
3. he, she, it - they

 

None of which changes what she said.

That is the real story.

I appreciate the Rev posting it, no matter where it came from. I didn't know she was a bigoted as she has shown herself to be.

 

Shhh, you're being too loud Rev. "We only whisper it." http://m.nationalreview.com/article/388757/we-only-whisper-it-kevin-d-williamson

 

Agree with you that fetuses are human beings. I am not diminishing them in any way by calling them fetuses.

You mean once the baby is born, right?

You realize you just said, "once the child is born Ginsburg wants them aborted."

No, I'm going for clarity. Your attempt to say that aborting babies is the equivalent of killing poor children is obfuscating.

 

Good link, Gina! Personally, I thought that children are a blessing. If we murder Jewish children we are like Pharaoh but if it is just poor children it is okay in Ginsburg's mind.

 

Of course! Notice how the left likes to use Latin words to confuse the subject--fetus is merely Latin for unborn child.

Another curious point is that Ginsburg brings the subject of money into the conversation. I don't think that she is an average Jew, but I doubt if the average Jew even in this country thinks that life is so cheap that we have to murder the unborn child just for a few bucks. But Ginsburg seems to want poor people dead. At the time Clinton put her on the Court she was worth 10 or 11 million dollars. She is probably worth 50 million now. Clearly, she does not want to spend her money on the poor. Israel probably would reject her. She will have to retire to Martha's Vineyard with all of the others of her type.