SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
Just like I would state Unlimited atonement was a teaching, would not say was heresy!

Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Just like I would state Unlimited atonement was a teaching, would not say was heresy!

What does a person being a branch cast into a fire to be burned mean?That verse not teaching losing eternal life though!
Refers to something that was not producing ANY fruit or evidence of new life in Christ!What does a person being a branch cast into a fire to be burned mean?
1 John 3:6 to interpert John 15:6.
Refers to something that was not producing ANY fruit or evidence of new life in Christ!
Faithless branch in Israel, broken off and replaced by a Gentile one!but it was a "branch"!
Faithless branch in Israel, broken off and replaced by a Gentile one!
Not the same type of brance. A in the vine being Christ versus an olive tree (With Israel, Ephesians 2:12).Faithless branch in Israel, broken off and replaced by a Gentile one!
Abiding in Christ means that one is saved, so the one not found in Christ thrown away, as not saved!John 15 is not talking about Israel but unfaithful believers
All saved are found abiding in Christ, as he is the source of their eternal life!Not the same type of brance. A in the vine being Christ versus an olive tree (With Israel, Ephesians 2:12).
Then salvation can be lost, John 15:2, John 15:6, but were really never saved 1 John 3:6.John 15 is not talking about Israel but unfaithful believers
The Bibles truth is not a false doctrine, MB. You are prejudiced against the gospel of grace as you teach the gospel of law...the thing that Paul called anathema. You are not speaking for your King.Of course I'm prejudice against false doctrines like yours. I prefer the truth over non-truth
I love God and respect His Word to much to ad or subtract from it as you do. Just for your false doctrines
MB
The completion of your definition. You are simply unwilling to follow your assertion to its end. In short, you are too lazy to test your assertion and admit you are wrong. That is pride on your part. You would rather not study your assertion than admit you misspoke.The completion in your view, not mine.
I recognize you are abusively misunderstanding Jesus words to his chosen disciples at the last supper. You create a false doctrine from verses you do not understand.What you fail to understand, without a general redemption there is no security by means of a particular redemption. John 15:2, "Every branch in Me . . . ." John 15:6 That does not abide.
John 10:29That does not say only the elect are saved. Are you seeing things that just aren't there
MB
Is this one false too?
And he is the propitiation for our sins:
and not for ours only,
but also for the sins of the whole world.
1 John 2:2
Oh, sorry. Did I type it wrong?
And he is the propitiation for only our sins
and just the elect only,
not for anyone else's sins in the whole wide world.
The Bibles truth is not a false doctrine, MB. You are prejudiced against the gospel of grace as you teach the gospel of law...the thing that Paul called anathema. You are not speaking for your King.
The problem really is that Calvinism is not biblical doctrine. You've never shown proof that it is. It comes from Augustine and the Catholic church, not the Bible
MB.