The Holy Bible IS The Word of Almighty God

Imprisonment could indeed be considered a form of torture, especially if one is innocent. Severe pain can be mental, physical, emotional or spiritual. Duh...but I thought even YOU would realize that. NOPE! I guessed you wouldn't.

 

Still no evidence of torture.
As expected because it does not exist, except in your mind. DUH.

In HIS service;
Jim

 

As stated before, Jim, evidence has been posted in this thread by logos, and elsewhere on the BB. As stated before, I'm not doing your homework for you. As stated before, torture doesn't have to be physical....take it or leave it, though I suspect that many of those baby baptizing Anglicans did indeed torture those they imprisoned. That is a given. Of course, you wouldn't admit that, would you? Didn't think so.

 

Sorry Icthus.

My bad.

In HIS service;
Jim

 

Are you going to allow this complete nonsense that you read about these godly men who worked on the KJV, to distort the truth? Should we also react in such a way to John Calvin, who approved of the murder of a heretic?

My OP deals with the Holy Bible as being the Word of God. This is NOT the place to discuss the good and bad of various Bible translators. Start your own post on your subject attacking the KJV translators. </font>[/QUOTE]I believe you have contributed to this also, icthus, have you not? I believe it IS the place to discuss it when you imply ANY version is 100% error free. I believe we all know that there is evidence quite to the contrary (including scribal errors, errors in translation, etc). Nobody is questioning that the BIBLE is the Word of God.

 

Nobody has the original autographs....I don't believe that anyone has claimed that they weren't inspired or error free...or have I overlooked where they have?

 

icthus, I would like to state that in your OP, it does indeed sound like, from your own wording, that you are indeed a defender of the KJV and that particular line...so, I don't believe I am wrong. You state that the modern translations or methods try to take away from God....again...not so. Can't have it both ways, icthus. Either one translation from one line is 100% word for word, letter for letter, comma for comma, period for period perfect, or it is not.

 

icthus, YOU are the one who has made mention of the alleged errors of modern texts, slamming W/H and stating in the second paragraph of your OP "the English version line, the KJV, etc". It does leave open the question of your position concerning the KJV....is it the WoG? How about the NIV...is it the WoG, or does it merely "contain" the WoG? What about the NASB? RSV? ASV?

As far as trying another language, well, if you want to try...go ahead. You state that you believe what we have today is 99% accurate. In which form/version?

The Bible we have is accurate for all points of doctrine, instruction, etc. Again, I don't believe anyone here doubts that. I see you avoided my question on whom is questioning the accuracy of the original autographs.

 

Look about five posts up, icthus....but someone answered it on your other thread. Also, I listed an apology to you for overlooking CBTS's posts questioning the inerrancy of the originals. Hope that clears things up.