That is quite a large number!You are a master of misinformation BJ.
In your opinion. What about the frequency of places in which it differs from the standard Byzantine text?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That is quite a large number!You are a master of misinformation BJ.
In your opinion. What about the frequency of places in which it differs from the standard Byzantine text?
The Nasb/Nkjv/Niv teams ALL had to agree withthe inerrancy/infallibility of the scriptures, so where are those liberals and heathens?Modern versions also have a basket full of heathens and liberals helping out.
Or those who did the Nasb/Esv/Niv, as the team in Oxford held to some peculiar Anglican doctrines still!Do you apply the exact same standards of doctrinal soundness to all Bible translators including the KJV translators?
Can you provide sound evidence that shows that the Church of England makers of the KJV were more sound in doctrine than the NKJV translators?
You have not named or identified for which verse or reference that you make this claim.My 1769 Oxford reads "Lord" (אדני - Adonai).