• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The New Testament Church

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
The New Testament Church: Always Local

When the New Testament speaks of the church, it is always speaking of a local, visible, gathered assembly. The singular term “the church” is used in a generic sense, just as we use singular nouns in everyday speech. I say, I washed the car, but I am not referring to a universal car. I say, I am going to the store, but I am not referring to a universal store. I tell my children, Go to your room, but I am not referring to a universal room. These are generic uses of singular nouns that refer to the kind of thing, not to a universal instance of that thing.

The same is true in Scripture. When the apostles wrote letters, they wrote to actual congregations in actual cities. They did not write to a universal church, visible or invisible. They wrote to churches, plural, and when they used the singular, it was generic, referring to the institution in its kind, not to a universal organism composed of all believers.

Paul begins Galatians by addressing multiple congregations. Galatians 1:2 says, “and all the brethren which are with me, unto the churches of Galatia.” These were real assemblies scattered throughout a region. He did not write to a universal church. He wrote to churches.

When Paul wrote to Corinth, he addressed a single congregation in a single city. First Corinthians 1:2 says, “Unto the church of God which is at Corinth.” Second Corinthians 1:1 repeats the same address. These letters were written to a local body with local members, local discipline, local ordinances, and local accountability.

The same pattern appears in Thessalonica. First Thessalonians 1:1 says, “Unto the church of the Thessalonians.” Second Thessalonians 1:1 repeats the same greeting. Again, a local church, not a universal abstraction.

The strongest evidence of all is found in Revelation. Christ Himself dictates seven letters to seven distinct churches, each with its own lampstand, its own pastor, its own rebukes, and its own promises. Revelation 2:1 says, “Write to the angel of the church in Ephesus.” Revelation 2:8 says, “Write to the angel of the church in Smyrna.” Revelation 2:12 says, “Write to the angel of the church in Pergamum.” Revelation 2:18 says, “Write to the angel of the church in Thyatira.” Revelation 3:1 says, “Write to the angel of the church in Sardis.” Revelation 3:7 says, “Write to the angel of the church in Philadelphia.” Revelation 3:14 says, “Write to the angel of the church in Laodicea.”

Seven churches. Seven lampstands. Seven pastors. Seven congregations. Seven letters. Seven judgments. Seven promises. No universal church anywhere in sight.

The New Testament presents churches, plural, and the generic singular simply refers to the church as an institution in its kind. It never presents a universal church, visible or invisible. The apostles wrote to real congregations, not to an abstract body composed of all believers. Christ walks among lampstands, not among a universal entity. His authority, His ordinances, His discipline, and His commission are given to actual assemblies that gather, baptize, teach, and send.

The unity of believers is real, but it is not expressed through a universal church concept. It is expressed through local congregations that hold the same faith, preach the same gospel, and obey the same Lord. The church in Scripture is always local, always visible, always gathered, always covenanted, and always accountable.

In Closing

The New Testament does not present a universal church, visible or invisible. It presents churches. It presents congregations that meet, worship, pray, teach, and obey. It presents pastors who receive letters, who answer to Christ, and who shepherd real people in real places. When Scripture speaks of the church in the singular, it is speaking generically, just as we do in ordinary speech. The church is the institution Christ established, and that institution always appears in the form of local assemblies.

This is the New Testament pattern. This is the Baptist conviction. This is the church Christ built. And this is the church every believer ought to belong to, not in theory, but in practice, in fellowship, and in obedience.

~Tony

© A.K. Pritchard 2026 -

Free to use with proper attribution.
 

Ascetic X

Well-Known Member
Epistles were addressed to individual church assemblies in specific locations, but were in effect written to, or for the benefit of, the entire universal church, because they were passed from one assembly to another. However there were references to specific persons and specific issues in the epistles.


Verses that refer not to one localized assembly in a specific location, but to the entire collective church composed of all believers:


Matthew 16:18

And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.




Ephesians 1:22,23

And He put all things in subjection under His feet, and made Him head over all things to the church,

And He is the head of the body, the church; He is the beginning and firstborn from among the dead, so that in all things He may have preeminence.



Acts 9:31

So the church throughout Judea, Galilee, and Samaria enjoyed peace, as it was being built up; and as it continued in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Spirit, it kept increasing.



Ephesians 3:21

Unto him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen.




Ephesians 5:23

For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.



Ephesians 5:32

This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.



Philippians 3:6

Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.




Acts 8:3

As for Saul, he made havock of the church, entering into every house, and haling men and women committed them to prison.




Colossians 1:24

Who now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his body's sake, which is the church:




1 Corinthians 12:28

And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.



1 Corinthians 15:9

For I am the least of the apostles, who am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.
 
Last edited:

Armchair Apologist

Active Member
I wonder if this was precipitated from a response I made in the other thread? Either way, this will make for some good discussion.

I am in agreement with much of what you are saying in your article but was was the original intent of the following line in the Nicene Creed:
We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic church...

This is what is typically invoked when one speaks of the "Invisible, Universal Church" is it not?

First things first: What is the original intent and what objections would you make in regards to this?

Breaking it down:
1. We believe in "One Church" which Christ has purchased with his own blood

2. We believe it is a "Holy Church" that God will present to himself without spot or wrinkle

3. We believe it is a (small c) "catholic" church meaning uniform, universally held to, and received (fundamental in doctrine, orthodox in faith and practice.

4. We believe it is an apostolic church - bulit on the foundation of the apostles and prophets (Eph 2:20) and based upon the inspired and authoritative writings they have left us.

As I stated in my prior response, The Church of Rome has completely changed the meaning of an "Invisible, Universal Church" to mean the hierarchical structure of the Church magisterium led by the Bishop of Rome (the Pope). In other words, the term "Roman Catholic" is actually a self-contradicting oxymoron!

I believe these are the main things that you would be taking exception to? If so, then we would be in 100% agreement.

However, when we are raised incorruptible in the age to come, there will be only ONE Church of which we all belong! We all belong to this One Church right now: those who are "The Called in Christ Jesus!" We must never forget or diminish this truth in our zeal to rightly stand against the errors of Popery!

With all of that said, every believer must identify themselves with and make themselves accountable to a local congregation and have someone in their life that they refer to as "Pastor" and have fellow believers who know them and are known of them! Any legitimate work of ministry should be through the authority of a local church congregation. "YouTube" and "Baptist Board" Pastors do not constitute a legitimate Local Church. Everyone needs a pastor that they can shake hands with and address each other on a familiar, first-name basis.
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
Epistles were addressed to individual church assemblies in specific locations, but were in effect written to, or for the benefit of, the entire universal church, because they were passed from one assembly to another. However there were references to specific persons and specific issues in the epistles.


Verses that refer not to one localized assembly in a specific location, but to the entire collective church composed of all believers:


Matthew 16:18

And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.




Ephesians 1:22,23

And He put all things in subjection under His feet, and made Him head over all things to the church,

And He is the head of the body, the church; He is the beginning and firstborn from among the dead, so that in all things He may have preeminence.



Acts 9:31

So the church throughout Judea, Galilee, and Samaria enjoyed peace, as it was being built up; and as it continued in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Spirit, it kept increasing.



Ephesians 3:21

Unto him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen.




Ephesians 5:23

For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.



Ephesians 5:32

This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.



Philippians 3:6

Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.




Acts 8:3

As for Saul, he made havock of the church, entering into every house, and haling men and women committed them to prison.




Colossians 1:24

Who now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his body's sake, which is the church:




1 Corinthians 12:28

And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.



1 Corinthians 15:9

For I am the least of the apostles, who am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.
1 Corinthians 11:3 makes the point plain:

“But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.”

Christ is the head of every man. One Christ, many men.
And “the woman” in the singular does not denote a universal woman.
Scripture uses singular nouns generically and institutionally without implying a universal organism.

My Brother, I was brought up with universalism, and was taught it in college, but reading and studying Scripture leaves me no other option but to abandon it. The language of Scripture simply does not support a universal, unassembled church. It speaks of churches, plural, and of the church as an institution in its kind, never of a universal body assembled on earth. The fact that Christ is “the head of the church” does not make the church singular any more than Christ being the head of every man makes humanity a single universal man. His headship is singular in person but plural in scope.

The very word translated “church,” ekklesia, means a called‑out assembly; and only when all believers are finally gathered at the great catching away will we be assembled as one body and revealed as the Bride.

The New Testament definition of a church is an assembly. A universal, unassembled church is a contradiction in terms.

The verses you listed fit naturally into the ordinary categories of biblical usage:

institutional (“I will build my church”)
generic class usage (“Christ loved the church”)
regional collective (“the church throughout Judea, Galilee, and Samaria”)
metaphorical (“His body’s sake, which is the church”)

None of them require a present‑tense universal church.

Yours in Him,

Tony
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
I wonder if this was precipitated from a response I made in the other thread? Either way, this will make for some good discussion.

I am in agreement with much of what you are saying in your article but was was the original intent of the following line in the Nicene Creed:


This is what is typically invoked when one speaks of the "Invisible, Universal Church" is it not?

First things first: What is the original intent and what objections would you make in regards to this?

Breaking it down:
1. We believe in "One Church" which Christ has purchased with his own blood

2. We believe it is a "Holy Church" that God will present to himself without spot or wrinkle

3. We believe it is a (small c) "catholic" church meaning uniform, universally held to, and received (fundamental in doctrine, orthodox in faith and practice.

4. We believe it is an apostolic church - bulit on the foundation of the apostles and prophets (Eph 2:20) and based upon the inspired and authoritative writings they have left us.

As I stated in my prior response, The Church of Rome has completely changed the meaning of an "Invisible, Universal Church" to mean the hierarchical structure of the Church magisterium led by the Bishop of Rome (the Pope). In other words, the term "Roman Catholic" is actually a self-contradicting oxymoron!

I believe these are the main things that you would be taking exception to? If so, then we would be in 100% agreement.

However, when we are raised incorruptible in the age to come, there will be only ONE Church of which we all belong! We all belong to this One Church right now: those who are "The Called in Christ Jesus!" We must never forget or diminish this truth in our zeal to rightly stand against the errors of Popery!

With all of that said, every believer must identify themselves with and make themselves accountable to a local congregation and have someone in their life that they refer to as "Pastor" and have fellow believers who know them and are known of them! Any legitimate work of ministry should be through the authority of a local church congregation. "YouTube" and "Baptist Board" Pastors do not constitute a legitimate Local Church. Everyone needs a pastor that they can shake hands with and address each other on a familiar, first-name basis.
The Nicene Creed is not Scripture, nor is it the standard of faith and practice for Baptists. Its language reflects the theological categories of the fourth century, not the usage of the New Testament. I do not object to the Creed because of Rome’s later reinterpretation, but because its phrasing does not match biblical ecclesiology.

When the Creed says “one holy catholic and apostolic church,” it is using catholic in the sense of “according to the whole,” but that is still a post‑biblical category. The New Testament never speaks of a present‑tense universal church. It speaks of churches, plural, and of the church as an institution in its kind, never of a universal body assembled on earth.

The “one church” Christ purchased with His blood is the redeemed themselves, who will be assembled at the resurrection. That is the future assembly, the Bride, gathered at the great catching away. But that future assembly does not create a present universal church any more than the future resurrection creates a present universal body.

The apostolic foundation (Eph 2:20) is the foundation of the faith, not a universal ecclesiastical structure. The apostles did not teach a universal church; they planted local assemblies and addressed them individually.

I agree entirely that Rome’s reinterpretation of “catholic” is an error, but the solution is not to adopt a universal church category that Scripture does not teach. The New Testament definition of a church is an assembly. A universal, unassembled church is a contradiction in terms.

When we are raised incorruptible, there will indeed be one assembled Bride. But that future assembly does not imply a present universal church. Right now, Christ is the head of every man (1 Cor 11:3), yet humanity is not one universal man. His headship is singular in person but plural in scope. The same applies to His relationship to local churches.

I agree with you fully on the necessity of belonging to a local congregation, being accountable to a pastor, and rejecting the idea of “internet pastors.” On that point we are in complete unity. My only caution is simply this: our ecclesiology must be drawn from Scripture, not from the Nicene Creed.

The Nicene Creed, which is not my authority, not inspired, does not supersede Scripture and is not binding on me or on Baptists in general, cannot govern our ecclesiology. Scripture alone must do that.

Yours in Him,

Tony
 

Ascetic X

Well-Known Member
All the verses I quoted refer not to one localized church in a specific location.

There are multiple local church assemblies, but only one collective church, just like there is only one body of Christ, to which we all belong as individual parts.


The very word translated “church,” ekklesia, means a called‑out assembly; and only when all believers are finally gathered at the great catching away will we be assembled as one body and revealed as the Bride.

The New Testament definition of a church is an assembly. A universal, unassembled church is a contradiction in terms.

The verses you listed fit naturally into the ordinary categories of biblical usage:

institutional (“I will build my church”)
generic class usage (“Christ loved the church”)
regional collective (“the church throughout Judea, Galilee, and Samaria”)
metaphorical (“His body’s sake, which is the church”)

None of them require a present‑tense universal church.

Yours in Him,

Tony
You call the universal collective church:

institutional (“I will build my church”)
generic class usage (“Christ loved the church”)
regional collective (“the church throughout Judea, Galilee, and Samaria”)
metaphorical (“His body’s sake, which is the church”)

It is still the same idea that we all belong to the unified body of Christ, which is also existing as individual local churches.

The concept of the universal church means that if we are attending a specific local church, then realize that the pastor is a fraud, or the teachings are unscriptural, or the church is woke or abusive, we can leave it and seek within the universal church a better local church.

To think the word “church” in the New Testament refers only to that specific church you were attending, but now want to leave, means you cannot leave it.
 

Deacon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The New Testament Church: Communal unity (local and universal)

ἐκ (ek), meaning “out,” and καλέω (kaleō), meaning “to call,” leaving the literal sense of the word to mean, “the called out ones.
It does not necessarily mean a gathering of "church people" or believers (e.g. Acts 19:32, 41; where ἐκκλησία is translated as "assembly.")
It is commonly translated "assembly," in the LXX when describing the Israelites when gathered as a group.

So common usage shows that ἐκκλησία fits with a local assembly of Christians.
But context determines usage. With certainty, the word generally refers to a local assembly,
But in a number of passages the meaning is extended by metaphor towards a broader assembly of "called out ones." (Matthew 16:18; Acts 8:3; 9:31 ("church" - singular); 1 Cor 11:22; Eph 1:22; 5:23...)

1 Cor 12:12-27 emphasizes the believer's corporate unity despite their background, location or social status.
The frequently used phrase, "the church of God" (Acts 11:28; 1 Cor 10:32; 1 Cor 11:22 (compare with 1 Cor 1:2; 2 Cor 1:1) utilizes this metaphorical usage.

Rob
 
Last edited:

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
Q: Is the Church local or universal?

A: Yes.
A clever slogan that collapses the moment you hold it up to the text. The universal assembly exists only when the assembly actually assembles. The text is clear: ekklēsia is local in the present and universal only in the future gathering. We should discuss the word ekklēsia, hold it up to the light of the meaning itself and go from there.
 

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
But in a number of passages the meaning is extended by metaphor towards a broader assembly
Brother, metaphor never overturns literal meaning. Ekklēsia literally means assembly, and the New Testament uses it that way consistently. The broader unity of believers is real, but the universal assembly exists only when the assembly actually assembles, a future event. The present usage remains local and visible.
 

Deacon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The metaphorical interpretation does not deny the existence of the literal meaning but it redirects and expands the meaning.

Example:
Jesus used this when he said, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” (John 2:19)
Everyone understood it literally (understanding it as the Jerusalem temple),
but John goes on to say, "...he was speaking about the temple of his body." (John 2:21)

I'd agree that in most instances the Greek word, ekklēsia is used to address a local assembly.

1 Corinthians 12 deals with a local problem but Paul's message is universal, covering all believers.
We (all believers) are Christ's body. Paul is writing to the Corinthian church assembly, but it is applicable to Christians of all ages.
The image he mentions in 1 Corinthians 12:27 is that the entire assembly of believers is united in one body, Christ's.

He continues, "And God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healing, helping, administrating, and various kinds of tongues. (1 Cor. 12:28, church / ekklēsia [singular]),

Who is Paul audience:
There are two choices:
(1) local Corinthian church - only the Corinthian believers; Paul's message is restricted to one local assembly.
(2) Church universal - all Christians

I personally interpret this broadly to mean the universal church of Christ.

Rob
 
Last edited:

Anthony Pritchard

Well-Known Member
The metaphorical interpretation does not deny the existence of the literal meaning but it redirects and expands the meaning.

Example:
Jesus used this when he said, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” (John 2:19)
Everyone understood it literally (understanding it as the Jerusalem temple),
but John goes on to say, "...he was speaking about the temple of his body." (John 2:21)

I'd agree that in most instances the Greek word, ekklēsia is used to address a local assembly.

1 Corinthians 12 deals with a local problem but Paul's message is universal, covering all believers.
We (all believers) are Christ's body. Paul is writing to the Corinthian church assembly, but it is applicable to Christians of all ages.
The image he mentions in 1 Corinthians 12:27 is that the entire assembly of believers is united in one body, Christ's.

He continues, "And God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healing, helping, administrating, and various kinds of tongues. (1 Cor. 12:28, church / ekklēsia [singular]),

Who is Paul audience:
There are two choices:
(1) local Corinthian church - only the Corinthian believers; Paul's message is restricted to one local assembly.
(2) Church universal - all Christians

I personally interpret this broadly to mean the universal church of Christ.

Rob
Metaphor can expand application, but it cannot redefine lexical meaning. Jesus’ use of “temple” in John 2 is a metaphor built on the literal meaning of temple; it doesn’t erase the literal meaning or replace it. The same is true with ekklēsia. The word literally means a called‑out assembly, and the New Testament uses it that way consistently. Metaphors like “body of Christ” describe spiritual unity, but they don’t change the meaning of ekklēsia. The universal assembly exists only when the assembly actually assembles (Hebrews 12:22–23), a future event. Present‑tense usage remains local, visible, and gathered.

Yours in Him,

Tony
 
Top