1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The origin of evil and the decrees of God

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Skandelon, Jul 17, 2011.

  1. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    1
    This is something I can definitely be confident about. In the case "non-empiricals" such as theology is boils down to two things, interpretation and most importantly FAITH.
     
  2. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,377
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Faith:
    Baptist
    you will have to convince me.....by nature Im arrogant (had to throw that in...hehehe) & a skeptic. Plus Im a dumb Marine. speak s_l_o_w_l_y & don't use big words.
     
  3. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,377
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That theory extends pretty much to life. Dont Doctors & Lawyers "Practice" ....however Ive learned this little thing I will share with you Dave & that is, " Bedside manners is no substitute for the right diagnosis"
     
  4. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Skan
    :thumbs::thumbs: correct....the mosquito might be carrying malaria...orsomething else

    EWF.....has missed this a bit.....EWF
    http://www.sg-audiotreasures.org/wd_index.htm
    EWF.... WR Downing listen to God and Worms ..... scroll down to it
     
  5. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,377
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Oh I got a better one.....Isaiah 45: 7 .
    I form the light & create darkness. I bring prosperity & create disaster; I, the Lord do all these things.

    Splain dat!

    Icono....before I listen to him....who is he?
     
    #25 Earth Wind and Fire, Jul 18, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 18, 2011
  6. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'd just add that I would see the average mosquito bite falling under God's permissive decree, while the worm seems to be a direct intervention of God's active agency in Jonah's life.
     
  7. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    Think that the Cals/Arms are really closer together than farther apart in area of Sotierology than one wouuld believe based upon various posters here on the BB!

    At this point in time, believe that the Bible teaches us that indeed God has both a permissive and a determinent Will, and that in all things, whether caused/allowed, works all things out to His glory according to his divine Will and purposes!
     
  8. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    EWF......Listen first...I guarentee if you stick with the whole sermon,it will be most helpful...He is a friend of Al Martin:thumbs::thumbs::wavey:

    I could not believe how he tied in so much in this sermon....this was a major wake up call...lol.. I think I had hair before i listened to this sermon,haha. i had to listen several times to pick up much I missed....I could not process it all in one sitting..you will see, enjoy![I am not sure if enjoy...is quite the right word.....it might be somewhat convicting]
     
    #28 Iconoclast, Jul 18, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 18, 2011
  9. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    :thumbs: I agree, which is why its frustrating when some here disagree about points that really shouldn't be points of contention. Much of the disagreement is a result of a lack of clarity and subsequent misunderstanding, IMO.
     
  10. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    :laugh:

    I was going to listen to it until you said that!!! ;)
     
  11. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    Yes.

    But what you have avoided is admitting that THOUGH God does not bring evil to pass by his positive agency- he planned and purposed that evil should exist.

    God planned to build a world where he intended that men in that world should sin and go to hell.

    What sets you and I apart from "non-cals", since you are more specifically an Arminian which means you have an orthodox and consistent theology is this:

    You and I do not believe that God's eternal purposes can EVER be thwarted.

    As some of the "non-cals" said themselves, they believe that God's purposes CAN and ARE thwarted all of the time.

    So when a man sins, they do not see that as you and I do-

    That God hates sin, and that God does not positively bring it to pass, but that God always intended for that sin to come to pass that God ordered the universe so that it would infallibly come to pass and that God always intended to use that sin for his own glory and that God purposed it for that reason before the world began.

    But these people without a theology cannot fathom that. They think it means that God is the author of sin.

    They say that God NEVER purposed for that man to commit that sin.

    And when that man goes to hell, they do not see it as you and I do-
    They think that man went to hell against the eternal purposes of God.

    They think God NEVER intended, never purposed his damnation.

    They think that man defied the eternal purposes of God.

    This is insufficient.

    They are not based ONLY on his omniscience.

    They are based on his PURPOSES.
     
    #31 Luke2427, Jul 18, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 18, 2011
  12. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    Can you clearly explain the distinction between (1) God not bringing evil to pass by his positive agency and (2) God planning and purposing that evil should exist.

    I'm just trying to understand your distinction between these two concepts to see if we can find some common ground. Thank you.
     
  13. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Skan,

    i was working in a warehouse going through college when i first heard this sermon....it starts out slow...by the title I was thinking this seems odd....it has been one of the most stunning messages i have ever heard....and it taught me that everything in scripture has a divine purpose....

    Give it a good listen...let me know what you think....I listened to it a few times each year since, and still learn from it.
    How he ties it back to the cross, is masterful...I believe God given wisdom
    if several in here get to listen ..we could do a thread on it,,,it speaks to many areas of our life and understanding.
     
    #33 Iconoclast, Jul 18, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 18, 2011
  14. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    Thank you iconoclast.

    This is what I have been trying to get Skandelon to see for months.

    He does not understand compatabalism and he has not spoken with enough mainstream Calvinists deeply enough to get it.

    He has literally said that all of us who say God PURPOSED for sin to exist and God ORDAINED it are outside the scope of mainstream Calvinists.

    Of course that means that all the Puritans were outside the scope of mainstream Calvinism.

    So was Jonathan Edwards and so is John Piper and Bruce Ware- oh- and so is John Calvin.
     
  15. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    Luke, I honestly think you are talking about two different things. Please allow me to explain:

    They hear you saying "God always gets what he wants or desires." (as that was the title of your thread), but clearly there are some things which happen that God doesn't desire or take pleasure in. It may serve His ultimate purpose and in that sense, yes, it is according to His sovereign purpose/will.

    So, while God may have a purpose in the perishing of wicked, He may not WANT or DESIRE or take PLEASURE in the perishing of the wicked. This is why the way you ask questions can be confusing and cause point of contention that really don't need to exist between Calvinistic Baptists and Non-Calvinistic Baptists. Do you understand my point?
     
  16. JesusFan

    JesusFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    8,913
    Likes Received:
    240
    God allowed Evil and Sin to come to pass into His creation in order that through it, His plan of redeeming man and the Creation out from it would be even greater than what man and the creation was subjected to by falls of satan and man...

    the Lord cannot cause evila nd sin, against His holy nature, did cause to bring to pass into History His great master plan to redeem out of the wreak caused by it His creation, and those whom He would save...

    God used the acts and plans of eveil/wicked men and Devil to accomplish his great plans and purposes...

    See it as God determining to bring glory to Himself out of the wicked schemes and plans of Satan and men, that he determined to both directly cause and to use their ways to bring to pass His plan and purposes!
     
  17. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    God's positive agency is ANYTHING that occurs that is good.

    God is actively bringing that to pass.

    When a sinner is saved, when a saint gives to missions or helps some hungry family with groceries all for the glory of God, etc, etc, etc...

    God's passive involvement has to do with when ANYTHING evil occurs.

    A man wishes to worship a false god, or to harm his neighbor with evil motives-

    The evil that exists there exists because God has removed his moral goodness from that situation.

    Just as darkness ensues when light vacates so does evil ensue when God's goodness vacates.

    Since God is not moving IN but rather moving OUT in those situations it cannot rightly be said that those situations are proximately caused by God and his positive agency.

    But when good takes place, God is not moving OUT there- no- the good is taking place for the very reason that God is moving INTO that situation.
     
  18. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    I understand that and have from the beginning.

    What God takes pleasure in was not the subject of the thread.

    I did not say, nor imply, nor hint at the idea that God takes pleasure in evil.

    If they want to hear "Spaghetti monsters eat pink elephants," when I say, "God's eternal purposes are NEVER thwarted- I cannot help that.

    People can hear what they want to hear.

    I am not responsible for what people want to hear.

    I am responsible for what I say.

    And what I say is what YOU BELIEVE-

    That EVERYTHING that EVER HAPPENS FOREVER happens according to the eternal purposes of God.
    Now God wants some things for what they are and he wants other things for what he will bring from them- but everything happens because he wants it to happen.

    Now if they read that and hear, "Tinkerbell has a thing for Captain Hook,"- well I can't help that.
     
    #38 Luke2427, Jul 18, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 18, 2011
  19. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    Here is a post where I thoroughly addressed what I feel are the major problems with the Compatibilistic framework. It was posted in 2007 and I have had countless conversations both before and after this one thoroughly addressing, and correctly representing Compatiblism.

    Once again you resort to unfounded and immature accusations instead of simply engaging in a reasonable and respectful conversation. Please stop.

    Find an actual quote or stop putting words in my mouth Luke. You cannot be trusted to properly represent my views on any subject. Quote me verbatim or leave me out of the discussion, ok?

    Did you know MacArthur and others accuse guys like Pink (the man Iconoclast quoted) as being outside the mainstream and in opposition to what he defines as being true "biblical" Calvinistic thought?

    Could it be that I understand your views but just want to point out where they differ from what some consider to be true classical/orthodox Calvinism? It's fine to disagree with me or the like of Edwards or MacArthur or even Calvin, but to accuse me of "not understanding" or "not getting it" or "misrepresenting you" is getting old and is completely unfounded.
     
  20. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yet the title utilized the term "want" which carries a very clear connotation regarding what one "desires" or "takes pleasure in." I'm not saying it can't be taken any other way, I'm only pointing to the confusion of not drawing a clear distinction in what Piper calls "the two wills of God." You are arguing for one aspect of what God wills and they are arguing against another aspect of what God doesn't desire and you just keep talking right past each other. Why not just be more clear and acknowledge the distinction that Piper and the other reformed posters have acknowledged here in this thread?
     
Loading...