Featured The Problem with KJV ONLY Advocates

Thank you for your advice agedman, and I mean that, but, I'll throw my opinion in too

 

IF he wa to look that word up in any Hebrew lexicon/word dictionary, would see that the emphasis was placed upon the intent of the action, as God was NOTagainst killing that had to be done, such as when he ordered the isrelaites to wipr out pagan central in land, but that God against murder, against wanton killing for no valid reason!

 

I find offense at your flippant use of the Lord's Name.

His name is holy and ought to be respected more than that.

 

Thank you. I do appreciate that.

 

Actually, "the Lord" is one of His TITLES, not His name, which He said is "I AM", ot "Yahweh".

But usually, "the Lord" without a name attached is in reference to God, and should be respected thusly.

 

MMRRPP! WRONG!

It's PASCHA whose meaning has changed. And you've forgotten that the older Geneva Bible reads "the passeoeur" in Acts 12:4.

You've obviously not read the AV 1611 too closely, or you'da known it includes an "Easter-Finder" in its extratextual material, and the translators considered Easter and Christmas as the two holiest days of the year. Clearly, the AV menknew what easter was.

Your argument is phony as a Chevy Thunderbird.

But I read English, apparently a lot better than YOU, and a lot better than the wing nuts who show up at a prison where an execution is taking place, holding up signs reading "Thou shalt not KILL".

Don't be silly-"Kill" is an "English word.

But again, I'm apparently 'WAY aheada YOU in English.

But in English, I know the difference in KILL and MURDER, which seemsta be giving you some trouble. If you're so good at hebrew, how come you can't see the difference in the Hebrew terms that every Hebrew-reading rabbi I've ever spoken to easily sees?

You're biased and blinded by your KJVO myth.

And I know better than to believe anything as obviously Satanic and FALSE as the man-made KJVO myth, derived from a CULT OFFICIAL'S book by two dishonest authors.

 

Inspector Javert:

About Hyles? Here ya go:

{Jack Hyles, Enemies of Soul Winning (Hammond, IN: Hyles-Anderson Publishers, 1993), p. 47.}

So, U stand corrected.

 

Inspector Javert:

I posted the MAN-MADE origin of the current KJVO myth in a previous thread. I can post it for you again, if you wish, if you believe you can prove one word of it wrong.

And I betcha can't provide one quark of SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT for KJVO, either, a fact which, in & of itself makes it false.

 

KJV-only advocates have not presented any consistent view of the preservation of the Scriptures in the original languages that actually would properly lead to KJV-onlyism.

I believe in the preservation of the Scriptures and believe that God has been faithful to keep all His promises.

Accepting all that the Scriptures state about themselves does not lead me and many other believers to a modern, man-made KJV-only theory.

 

You continue your improper tactic of misrepresentation and distortion of what believers in the Scriptures [who merely disagree with KJV-only opinions] actually state and believe.

Would a consistent application of your own statements assert that God was not the author of the ever changing English renderings in the varying English Bibles printed from 1526 until 1612?

There are the same type difference between the pre-1611 English Bibles and the 1611 KJV as you would find between the KJV and some present English Bibles, especially the NKJV.

Are you suggesting that God is not the author of all the hundreds and even thousands of differences in hundreds of varying editions of the KJV printed from 1611 until today?

What division has KJV-onlyism caused among believers today

 

double post

 

Ten page limit reached