Tiny Heavy Metal, Baby

[SGO]

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/202...s-but-dont-worry-line-up-and-take-your-shots/

by Jon Rappoport

September 15, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

First, current news—Japan and the Moderna COVID vaccine. Fiercepharma reports:

“…another one million doses of the vaccine were suspended over concerns of possible contamination found in two additional vaccine lots…The material was determined to be metallic particles, Japan news outlet NHK reported last week. Last week, Japan suspended the use of 1.63 million doses.”

So that’s two separate suspensions of lots of the Moderna vaccine in Japan.

But this is just the beginning of the problem. Here is a piece I wrote more than a year ago, about a widely ignored study. The implications are staggering:

—Dangerous nanoparticles contaminating many vaccines; groundbreaking study—

“The Lung,” Second Edition, 2014: “Nanoparticles [are] comparable in size to subcellular structures…enabling their ready incorporation into biological systems.”

A 2017 study of 44 types of 15 traditional vaccines, manufactured by leading global companies, has uncovered a very troubling and previously unreported fact:

The vaccines are heavily contaminated with a variety of nanoparticles.

Many of the particles are metals.

We’re talking about traditional vaccines, such as HPV, flu, Swine Flu, Hepatitis B, MMR, DPT, tetanus, etc.

To begin to understand some of the destructive effects of contaminating nanoparticles in vaccines, here is the groundbreaking 2017 study:

International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination
Volume 4 Issue 1
January 23 2017
New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines:
Micro- and Nanocontamination
Antonietta M Gatti and Stefano Montanari

https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/new-quality-control-investigations-on-vaccines-micro–and-nanocontamination.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20200604111734/https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/new-quality-control-investigations-on-vaccines-micro–and-nanocontamination.html

“The analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case. This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines…”

“The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that toxicity…they induce an inflammatory reaction.”

 

[SGO]

“After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas…But they can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination…As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect…due to a nano-bio-interaction…can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way…It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA…”

“In some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues…”

“Given the contaminations we observed in all samples of human-use vaccines, adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and credible and have the character of randomness, since they depend on where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation. It is only obvious that similar quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more serious impact on very small organisms like those of children. Their presence in the muscles…could heavily impair the muscle functionality…”

“We come across particles with chemical compositions, similar to those found in the vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of environmental contamination caused by different pollution sources. In most circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they have no technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like the result of the random formation occurring, for example, when waste is burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular those meant for infants.”

This 2017 study opens up a whole new field: the investigation of nanoparticles in vaccines where none were expected.

Such particles are not medicine in any sense of the word.

Many legal and scientific “experts” assert the State has a right to mandate vaccines and force them on the population. But these contaminating nanoparticles are not vaccines or medicines. Only a lunatic would defend the right of the State to inject them.

Here is another section from the 2017 study. Trade names of vaccines, and compositions of the nanoparticle contaminants are indicated. Take a deep breath and buckle up:

“…further presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases [all 44 vaccines], whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product…”

“…single particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (less than 100nm) and aggregates…debris of Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium and Titanium; of Iron, Chromium, Silicon and Calcium particles…arranged in a cluster, and Aluminum-Copper debris…in an aggregate.”

“…the particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all the samples analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec, Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro).”

“…particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride).”

“…singular debris found in Repevax (Silicon, Gold, Silver) and Gardasil (Zirconium).”

“Some metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were also identified. Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and Aluminum (Vivotif, Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix, Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec); Gold or Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron, Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1) were also found. The only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in 25/44. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a nano-bio-interaction…occurs and a ‘protein corona’ is formed…The nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body.”

“…examples of these nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen (stable composite entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec… of stainless steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel…) and of Copper, Zinc and Lead in Cervarix…Similar aggregates, though in different situations (patients suffering from leukemia or cryoglobulinemia), have already been described in literature.”

I’m sure you’ve read official assurances that vaccine-manufacturing problems are “rare.” You can file those pronouncements along with other medical lies.

“I’d like the heavy metal sandwich on rye, please. And instead of serving it on a plate, can you inject it?”

Several vital questions demanding answers spring from the findings of this 2017 study:

Are some of these nanoparticles intentionally placed in vaccines?

Does the standard manufacturing process for traditional vaccines INEVITABLY lead to dangerous and destructive nano-contamination?

New nano-technology is already being employed in vaccines—supposedly “improving effectiveness.” Does this manufacturing process carry with it the unavoidable effect of unleashing a hurricane of nanoparticle contaminants?

How many cases of childhood brain damage and autism can be laid at the door of nanoparticle contamination?

And finally, where are these contaminated vaccines manufactured? The above study did not attempt to discover this. It was outside the scope of the research. It’s common knowledge that, for example, in the case of the US, vaccines or their components, are, in many instances, not produced domestically. Where does this put control of safety? In, say, China, where there have been numerous pharmaceutical scandals connected to contamination of products?

The vaccine establishment does not show the slightest interest in answering any of these questions. They are busy pretending the questions don’t exist.

Trusting the establishment would be suicidal.

 

[JonC]

Yep. Two men died. The contamination was mot metals but suspected contaminants from inappropriate needle use drawing from same containers. The lots have been suspended.

This is a concern when various sires are used to produce vaccines (while we know the ctive ingredients are safe, there is a risk of poor oversight in mass producing vaccines. This far with covid vaccines there is no known problems.

 

[SGO]

AYUK, "The vaccine establishment does not show the slightest interest in answering any of these questions. They are busy pretending the questions don’t exist."

 

[JonC]

AYUK, "The vaccine establishment does not show the slightest interest in answering any of these questions. They are busy pretending the questions don’t exist."

I don't think so. Contamination has been a very big concern. Now, questions about heavy metals in the vaccines has been proven false. But contamination in the suspension is a legitimate concern. This is primarily a concern with introducing contaminants into vials during treatment (multi-dose vials).

 

[SGO]

Ayuk, false from big media and big pharma ayuk, ayuk.

Time for more names and the last word before you have the thread shut down, ayuk.

 

[JonC]

Ayuk, false from big media and big pharma ayuk, ayuk.

Time for more names and the last word before you have the thread shut down, ayuk.

Is that gibberish? How old are you?

Obviously these things are not normally in the vaccines (hence the word "contamination").

So the question becomes how these two samples became contaminated.

It seems there are two ways - during production in the suspension or during injections as these are multi-dose vials.

Japan says this was most likely due to improper multi-use but suspended the vaccines for further investigation.

I would be interested in the facility. We have seen not only vaccines but other products contaminated during the production process.

 

[SGO]

Oh boy, more name calling from a MODERATOR.

Ayuk, ayuk.

No evidunce ceptin' MAH evidunce, ayuk.

 

[JonC]

Oh boy, more name calling from a MODERATOR.

Ayuk, ayuk.

No evidunce ceptin' MAH evidunce, ayuk.

????????

I'm saying if the vaccines have contaminants then it is important to investigate the source of the contamination.

There seems to be two options - contamination in the production or contamination via multi-use (not of the actual needles but of the vials as they contain more than one dose).

Given the level(quantity) at which these vaccines were produced I would worry about contamination in the process. But as they found only 2 contaminated vials it may very well be that the vials were not handled properly.

Japan acted appropriately to suspend the Moderna vaccine and investigate the cause.

 

[JonC]

Looks like the issue is from Moderna vaccines from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co (the US is not affected).

The substance found was metallic. The two deaths have not actually been linked to the contaminants.

But this does highlight my initial concerns with quality control covering so many companies worldwide. I do not know that countries have the sane quality control processes. In the US this is not an issue.

 

[SGO]

Ayuk, those pesky contaminants.

Keep 'em in 'ol Nippon.

We don't need 'em here in the US of A.

Oopps, too bad Moderna is here too.

That must be the OLD Moderna not the NEW, modern, Moderna.

Think they got 'em from that old nuclear reactor that got hit by the tsunami?

No they had a different subcontractor and there was no quality control, right?

You guess.

 

[JonC]

Ayuk, those pesky contaminants.

Keep 'em in 'ol Nippon.

We don't need 'em here in the US of A.

Oopps, too bad Moderna is here too.

That must be the OLD Moderna not the NEW, modern, Moderna.

It is difficult to make sense of your post. What I get out of it is you are asking if this affects vaccines in the US

The answer is no. They do not know if the vaccines arrived contaminated or became contaminated from a needle. The substance was metallic and visible to the naked eye.

Japan suspended Moderna vaccines as a precaution. The vaccines were from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co and it is possible they became contaminated during production.

The reason this does not affect the US is the lots are from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. The US is not importing the vaccines. Most of the US Moderna vaccines are produced in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

But this is still a concern. Quality control is very important to avoid contamination.

Does that answer your question?

 

[SGO]

Ayuk, 'cept they talkin' about how good them nanos are here.

New Nanoparticle-Based Coronavirus Vaccine Shows Potential

And somebody, not from an "official" mouthpiece, is sayin' we got 'em here!

CONFIRMED! Graphene Oxide Main Ingredient In Covid Shots

She must mean them ox hides theys a usin'.

Er, mebbe 'taint contaminashun atall but ingreedyents.

Yeaya, thata makes sense 'cuz theys a greedy bunch so's thay add them xtra ingreedyents.

Oh, no. Kudunt be. Ayuk, ayuk.

 

[JonC]

Well, we actually know that none of the vacvines used in the US contain graphene oxide (this was a rumor dispelled easily on).

But the contamination could have been from a lot of sources (from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, from the tops of vials, from the vials themselves, from contamination in the needles). They will have to check it out well.

That said, those issue does not affect Moderna vaccines in the US (if that was your question). But they could should quality control lapse.

 

[SGO]

You may no it.
But ah do not trust your info.
Ayuk.
You forgot ta say sumpin bad about me these a last cupla posts.
Yer a slippin'.
Ayuk.

 

[JonC]

You may no it.
But ah do not trust your info.
Ayuk.
You forgot ta say sumpin bad about me these a last cupla posts.
Yer a slippin'.
Ayuk.

We do choose our sources. And we each have our reasons.

Here I trust mainstream sources while you trust Karen Kingston (more precisely, Ariyana Love referencing Stew Peterson, who interviewed Karen Kingston) for accurate information.

For me. I tend to consider as valid the medical experts, what you call the "establishment", because I know several people who are alive today because of medical treatments (some still experimental) developed by these experts.

All I know of Karen Kingston is that she worked at Pfizer as a sales representative for 2 years 6 months and left in 1998. I have no reason to believe her claim.

Why do you trust Karen Kingston when she says graphene oxide is an ingredient in the vaccine?

 

[JonC]

This is what I mean-

I referenced one of my sources on another thread.

David Wentworth earned a Doctor of Philosophy degree in virology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He studied coronaviruses as a postdoctoral fellow, and later as an instructor in the Department of Microbiology at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center in Denver.

Dr. Wentworth has conducted virological research since 1990 and has published 200 papers and was director of Viral Programs at the J. Craig Venter Institute from 2011 to 2014, where his studies focused on interspecies transmission, pathogenesis, viral evolution and vaccine development using synthetic genomic strategies. From 2002 to 2011, Dr. Wentworth was the director of the Influenza Virus and Coronavirus Pathogenesis laboratory at the Wadsworth Center, NYSDOH. He also was an assistant professor at the State University of New York-Albany, where his laboratory studied interspecies transmission of influenza viruses and coronaviruses.

I trust this doctor because he is an expert in his field with a proven track record. But he is not alone - his peers hold the same conclusions regarding the virus and vaccine.

Your source is Karen Kingston. She was a sales representative for Pfizer from June 1996 to December 1998. You are trusting her expertise in the mRNA vacvine developed by Pfizer in 2019.

I'm just asking why you consider her an authority or expert (why should we listen to her)?