• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

To KJVOs, Does The Translator notes matter

Keith M

New Member
Salamander said:
Why should we bow to a doctrine of man while we already have God's preservation as active?

The KJVO position is a "doctrine of man," Sal. You bow to it...

Salamander said:
Ah, now man's logic supercedes the Bible and its harmony.

Yes, the KJVO position is a great example of this.

Salamander said:
I mean, why let "pedo-baptizing monks" preserving God's word as non-validity while we have a murderer to make any version invalid!

Say what? You're not making sense here, Sal...
 

Salamander

New Member
Keith M said:
The KJVO position is a "doctrine of man," Sal. You bow to it...
have you been peeking again?:tongue3:



Yes, the KJVO position is a great example of this.
Gross misunderstanding on your behalf, again. We stand on complete harmony while your type is still guessing.



Say what? You're not making sense here, Sal...
Here, Keith, I'll get the cookies down for you:laugh:

If making the accusation against the KJB by the translators being "pedo-baptist/ Anglicans", why is that such a "haneous crime" when God used Saul of Tarsus/ Apostle paul/ murderer of Christians, to pen down most of the New testament?:sleep:
 

Logos1560

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Salamander said:
If making the accusation against the KJB by the translators being "pedo-baptist/ Anglicans", why is that such a "haneous crime" when God used Saul of Tarsus/ Apostle paul/ murderer of Christians, to pen down most of the New testament?

Is your comparison valid? How does the conduct of Saul before his salvation relate to the the doctrinal views of Church of England translators during the time of their translating? According to a number of the actual Church of England doctrinal views held by the KJV translators during the time of their translating, they misunderstood and misinterpreted some of the Scriptures.

Futhermore, you seem to ignore the fact that Paul's penning down of several books of the New Testament were under the miracle of direct inspiration of God.

The Church of England translators in 1611 did not operate under direct inspiration of God.

By the way, some of the KJV translators were involved in having men burned at the stake for their faith and in the persecution of others for their faith.
 
Top