Featured Trump: Convince me without personal attacks

Don't you think the guys that write it ought to be covered by it?

Lastly, no health care plan will succeed unless everyone is covered. Allowing the young and healthy to pay a small fine and opt out will kill any plan proposed. That is what is causing the current plan to collapse. But it will collapse also if all the "exemptions" granted illegally by executive order are reinstated. It's just a bad bill. Always has been.

 

Uh huh. But that's not what they want. They want to FORCE acceptance on a religious basis. Hillary backs that approach to the hilt.

 

“Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed"

Hillary Clinton

 

You're too moderate or liberal to vote for Trump, though. I'm not so sure you're liberal enough to vote for Hillary, that is why I suggested making that other thread.

Rubio primary voters were more moderate than any of the others, a primary is where you should vote among ideological lines, the general to a lesser extent. I think you're part of the open borders crowd just like Hillary and that right there should rule Trump out for you.

You're in a throwaway state (not red, it's really blue) as I am (not blue, it's really red) so another thing you could consider is writing Rubio's name in or something.

 

Lets as Berry what the alternative would be......

 

Since John Roberts decided to play politics and not jurist wrote his tortured and twisted opinion making the penalty for not getting insurance a "tax", the small amount of the "tax" encourages healthy individuals to wait until they get cancer of some other disease to enroll. The "tax" since it's now legal, needs to be more like 90% , or more, of what the average premium for individuals that age. Otherwise, no plan will ever work. Period.

 

This is what killed Marco Rubio's presidential aspirations.

That sounds close to Rubio's plan but none of them are going to go for that. Trump, I think, will try to do something about illegal immigration but there's no way he can possibly do worse than Hillary will. She has promised blanked amnesty in the first 100 days, and at that point, it is game over. Mexico paying for the wall might not be realistic to you but Hillary and her amnesty ought to be.

Yeah, Reagan was tricked into amnesty over thirty years ago - Congress gutted all the border controls after he signed the bill. He was punked and later regretted it. The "experts" claimed it would be around a million, ended up being over three million. Look what it did to California, that's what it will do to the entire country this time.

 

How safe is your state when RATs (who aren't voting for Hillary) stay home on election, allowing Democrats and Liberals to win local offices and issues? How safe are you when RATs in your state dissuade others in swing states from voting for Trump, and then we get Hillary's Supreme Court which finishes banning Christian religion and its values?

The only purpose of state-recognized same-sex relationships is for a foundation to trample on religious freedom.

 

Cut off government benefits form illegals, and they'll self-deport and we'll save $billions.

 

A visa [here I meant to say passport] used by Mexican citizens to enter the US costs $131. It allows the bearer to visit/travel for 30 days. There is nothing illegal about that, and as we all know this is not a problem.

People crossing our southern border who intend to work and stay in the US are not in the habit of obtaining a visa. That is why we see so many of them bypassing barriers or sneaking across in the trunks of cars etc. This is one reason to complete the fence.

E-verify is in use in about 1/2 of our states. If it was required for all states then of course illegals would not be able to work here and would self deport. This is part of the Trump policy on securing our border.