Tucker: Rittenhouse trial taught us this...

Tucker is in fine form here. He could hardly miss, as the prosecution and their MSM/Big Tech lackeys are so incompetent, mendacious, and malevolent in their agenda, rhetoric, and propaganda.

Tucker: Rittenhouse trial taught us this

 

Here's an excerpt from the associated article/transcript:

Now you notice in that statement complete unwavering certainty, and this is common for PolitiFact, which issues opinions like they're edicts from God himself. They do this because the social media companies use PolitiFact edicts as a pretext to censor any speech online that contradicts the official line of the Democratic Party. The so-called narrative.

So PolitiFact disagrees with what you're posting, then you are, by definition, spreading misinformation and you must be silenced. That's how it works. So naturally, other media organizations echoed this position immediately. "Kyle Rittenhouse, 17," declared the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, "was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had." Just stating it as fact. And then the entire national media followed suit and told us the same thing.

The problem was it was a lie. In fact, under Wisconsin law, which apparently no one in any newsroom in America had even bothered to check, 17-year-olds are allowed to carry rifles as long as their barrels meet a minimum length requirement, and Kyle Rittenhouse’s rifle met that requirement. So no, Kyle Rittenhouse did not violate Wisconsin's gun laws. Today, even the prosecution at the trial was forced to admit that. And so immediately, the judge dismissed the firearms charge.​

Tucker Carlson: Media and Big Tech lied about the Kyle Rittenhouse case - here's the truth​

 

An extremely sleazy prosecution, itself deserving of prosecution.

Video and autopsy evidence demonstrated that two assailants had grabbed the end of the rifle.

The prosecution claimed they found no assailant DNA on the rifle.

Where did they check? Only where Kyle was holding it. The assailants grabbed the end of the barrel, but the prosecution didn’t bother to check there.

The judge had to remind the prosecution over and over that the onus was on them to prove guilt, including in this point. Better to have done it in front of the jury.

 

Thanks for asking. No, he's quite a nice guy, but he was outraged by their egregious misconduct in this trial.

He has gone out of his way to be fair, probably way too fair to the prosecution. There are probably sufficient grounds for declaring a mistrial with prejudice.

He is also disturbed by the very irresponsible behavior of the media in commenting on this trial. He even wondered whether he should allow televised trials in the future.

The thing is, by televising the trial it is easy to see, for anyone who has time to watch, just how right he is on both counts. Both the MSM and the prosecution have demonstrated shameful political bias. But then, so did Biden. Lawsuits may be coming.

 

The following article gets it quite right. The clip is the actual excerpt where the judge really rips into the prosecution after the jury exits. It's quite informative. They clearly deserved the strong rebukes, and probably a lot worse to boot.

Rittenhouse judge tears into prosecution with aggressive tongue lashing over questioning

 

They were certainly laughably inept in not even providing sufficient evidence for the curfew violation charge. But their prosecution was mostly malicious, even unconstitutional—definitely not bona fide.

 

Yes, TYT is just the sort of disinformation Big Tech loves. None of those attacking Kyle were protesters. All of them were rioters, arsonists, vandals, except for the last, who pointed a gun at him.

That one works for the ACLU, is affiliated with The People’s Revolution, and was prejudicially livestreaming the riots and the scene in general. Oh, and he was illegally carrying his gun concealed.

He repeatedly lied to the police, claiming he had dropped his gun. He has also filed lawsuits, none of which mention he even had a gun, much less that he was carrying it illegally, pointed it at Kyle, then lied to the police.

Oh, did I fail to mention that he was also the prosecution's star witness?

 

Here’s a small clue of what’s going on. Begin watching at about 7:06:00, when the jury returns after requesting to break for the day.

One juror asks if they can take the jury instructions home. If I recall correctly, they are 36 pages long, and confusing.

Watch Live: WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Day 12 - Day 3 Jury Deliberations

 

That same link above records the judge stating that everyone from MSNBC News is barred from the building for the duration.

“I’ve instructed that no one from MSNBC News will be permitted in this building for the duration of this trial. This is a very serious matter… [2:31:57]"

His comments start here:

Watch Live: WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Day 12 - Day 3 Jury Deliberations

 

NOT GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS
Kyle Rittenhouse trial: Verdict is in, to be revealed shortly | FOX6 News Milwaukee

 

Anyone imagining that the Dem Progressive Left or their giant media propaganda arms are backing off should reconsider. They have no respect for the rule of law and never have.

The Dem Progressive Left is doubling down in the aftermath of being rebuked by the facts and the truth. Herein are some brief examples:

Hannity: ‘It was a huge day for the right of self-defense’