• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Two U.S. Senators Apply an Anti-Christian Religious Test for Government Officials

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Story: In a confirmation hearing of an executive branch nominee, two U.S. senators imply that those who believe Jesus is the only way to salvation are “Islamophobic” and not fit for public office.

The Background: Last year, a controversy erupted when a political science professor at Wheaton College decided to wear a hijab during Advent in solidarity with Muslims. In a post on Facebook, Larycia Hawkins wrote, “I stand in religious solidarity with Muslims because they, like me, a Christian, are people of the book. And as Pope Francis stated last week, we worship the same God.”

Many Christians disagreed with her claim, including Wheaton alum Russell Vought. In an article for the conservative website The Resurgent, Vought pushed back against a defense of Hawkins made by theologian John Stackhouse. “Having a deficient (e.g., nontrinitarian) theology of God,” Stackhouse said, “does not mean you are not in actual prayerful and faithful relationship with God.”

To this claim Vought responded, “Muslims do not simply have a deficient theology. They do not know God because they have rejected Jesus Christ his Son, and they stand condemned.”

This April President Donald Trump nominated Vought to serve as deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget. Vought’s Senate confirmation hearing was held yesterday.

At 1:26 p.m. EDT, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sent a statement about Vought’s confirmation hearing in which they quoted his remarks in The Resurgent article and said,

“Religious freedom is such a fundamental liberty that the framers of our Constitution enshrined it in the First Amendment. That’s why it’s so disturbing that Trump continues to pack his administration with appointees like Russell Vought, whose views threaten that very freedom.

“Trump’s nominee for this powerful position that helps decide how federal money is spent has claimed that ‘Muslims do not simply have a deficient theology. They do not know God because they have rejected Jesus Christ his Son, and they stand condemned.’

“We know that diversity is one of our nation’s greatest strengths, and it is vitally important that Americans have confidence that their public servants will serve our entire nation in good faith. That’s why we will watch Vought closely and press to ensure that those helping decide how public money is spent and the government is managed understand the vital importance of nondiscrimination.”

An hour later, in what appears to be a coordinated action with the ACLU, Senator Bernie Sanders grilled Vought on the quote during his nomination hearing. The socialist from Vermont read the quote and asked Vought, “Do you believe that statement is Islamophobic?”

Vought responded that he did not, that he was a Christian who based his principles on his faith, and that the statement was made in defense of Wheaton College’s statement of faith about the centrality of Jesus Christ for salvation.

Before Vought could finish responding, Sanders cut him off and asked whether Muslims stand condemned. Vought reiterated that he was a Christian, whereupon Sanders interrupted him again to ask if Jews stand condemned. For the third time Vought pointed out that he was a Christian and once again Sanders interrupted the nominee’s answer. Sanders began yelling at Vought, saying,

“I understand you are a Christian. But this country is made up of people who are not just [sic], I understand that Christianity is the majority religion. But there are other people who have different religions in this country and around the world. In your judgment, do you think that people who are not Christians are going to be condemned?”

Ten seconds into his answer, Sanders interrupted Vought once again to ask if the statement that “they do not know God” is respectful of other religions. After answering, Sanders said, “I would simply say, Mr. Chairman, that this nominee is really not someone who is what this country is supposed to be about.”

A few minutes later, Senator Christopher Van Hollen Jr. of Maryland quoted from Vought’s article and said,

“I think it is irrefutable that these kinds of comments suggest to a whole lot of Americans that, number one . . . you are condemning people of all faiths. I’m a Christian, but part of being a Christian in my view is recognizing that there are lots of ways that people can pursue their God. . . . It’s your comments that suggest a violation of the public trust in what will be a very important position.”

The relevant remarks made during the hearing can be found on this video, from minute 44:20 to 51:20.

Two U.S. Senators Apply an Anti-Christian Religious Test for Government Officials
 

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
“Religious freedom is such a fundamental liberty that the framers of our Constitution enshrined it in the First Amendment. That’s why it’s so disturbing that Trump continues to pack his administration with appointees like Russell Vought, whose views threaten that very freedom."

Ones religious belief IS a fundamental liberty for the People.

And ALL the People WHO, are or elect to be Citizens, should be well acquainted with the basis under which this country was established.

The intent, was, to establish;
a Republic Federation to do a few things, the individual states would not have authority to do, and subject to a US Constitution.
every individual state, would receive statehood, as a Republic, and dictate her own Constitution.
Every Law, would be guided to enactment according to:
...Biblical standards and principles.
Every elected position would be according to;
...the Democratic process of the citizens right to participate by a casting of a vote.

The intent, was, to encourage foreign People, WHO had;
....an asset, to come to America, meaning; means to support themselves, innovative ideas, accomplishments, etc.
AND
....a desire, to become assimilated, as a citizen, according to; being in agreement with our established governments.

The intent, was, to discourage foreign People, WHO had;
....nothing to offer in the way of being an asset
....no desire to assimilate

Early Laws, are very clear, in their parallel to Biblical standards and principles.

While some argue, that hey, this founder, or that founder were not Christians. That point is an irrelevant argument. They had a right to their personal beliefs,
to believe, or what to believe religiously. However when it came to the design and agreement of the Government, it would stand according to Biblical standards and principles.

The US Constitution, is a document typically viewed being limited to the body of the text, however if one were to observe more closely, of the very last sentence to which the signers agreed and signed their name....one would discover...this line..

done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,

In the Year of WHAT? Who? "OUR Lord"....and subscribed...by "OUR Names"..

The intent, was to be leery and cautious of foreigners WHO, come from foreign lands, that; their governments DICTATE a national religion requirement, to discourage any intent for foreigners to participate in government affairs who may attempt to introduce or influence their foreign style of government into our established system.

The right to vote, had it's caveats, particularly; being a citizen AND being vested in our country. And also, that the People would assess candidates, according to their willingness to be subject to our established standards and principles of law making, under Biblical standards and principles. With the exception of the President and Vice President, only being eligible for such offices, in agreement to such standards and principles AND IF their Parents were citizens at the time of the candidates birth.

A government representatives "personal belief" is irrelevant, however as a representative, their governmental duties required they adhere to Biblical standards and principles. It is the People at Large, who vote and decide an individuals intent, to hold an office, according to the limits established by the Constitution, and particularly those positioned as LAW MAKERS, to adhere to the standards and principles of the Bible, and limits set forth by the Constitution.

It is simply common knowledge; IF one is not familiar with standards and principles of the Bible, or the limits set forth by the Constitution....there is little expectation, they can adhere to such things.

It is NO SECRET ~ the US governments have become corrupted with umpteen Un-Constitutional Laws, and infiltrated with representatives that are FOREIGN to Biblical standards and principles.... and basically WHY the Federation is called a "corrupt government" and "untrustworthy government".

The Story: In a confirmation hearing of an executive branch nominee, two U.S. senators imply that those who believe Jesus is the only way to salvation are “Islamophobic” and not fit for public office.

THAT ^ is so ignorant on it's face, to be complaining about religious freedom while bashing religious freedom.

'Islamophobic" ? So what? What about "Muslims" who DO NOT BELIEVE Jesus is the only way to salvation? What's this guy trying say? Muslims who DO NOT BELIEVE Jesus is the only to salvation...WOULD BE fit for public office?

Our nation declared;
…The Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God…
…endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights…
…appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions…
…with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence

Our nation established; in the year of OUR Lord

Our nation proclaimed; in God WE Trust and ONE NATION, under God.
 
Top