Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It is great political theater. But, the most fundamental reality is that the average wealth of the elderly is some multiple of the average wealth owned by people in the other age brackets.
Why should the average taxpayer be subsidizing people who have much more wealth than they do?
If we are concerned about those particular elderly people who are in fact poor — as we are about other people who are genuinely poor, whatever their age might be — then we can simply confine our help to those who are poor by some reasonable means test. It would cost a fraction of what it costs to subsidize everybody who reaches a certain age.
But the political left hates means tests. If government programs were confined to people who were genuinely poor in some meaningful sense, that would shrink the welfare state to a fraction of its current size. The left would lose their human shields.
It is certainly true that the elderly are more likely to have more medical problems and larger medical expenses. But old age is not some unforeseeable misfortune. It is not only foreseeable but inevitable for those who do not die young.
It is one thing to keep people from suffering from unforeseeable things beyond their control. But it is something else to simply subsidize their necessities so that they can spend their money on other things and leave a larger estate to be passed on to their heirs.
People who say they want a government program because "I don't want to be a burden to my children" apparently think it is all right to be a burden to other people's children.
Among the runaway spending behind our current national debt problems is the extravagant luxury of buying political rhetoric.
Don't worry, the new Eugenics Bill (which we weren't allowed to read until after it was passed) will take care of all the Grandmas and Grandpas who refuse to die shortwith:It is certainly true that the elderly are more likely to have more medical problems and larger medical expenses. But old age is not some unforeseeable misfortune. It is not only foreseeable but inevitable for those who do not die young
What could have been done to stop the downgrade?
Don't worry, the new Eugenics Bill (which we weren't allowed to read until after it was passed) will take care of all the Grandmas and Grandpas who refuse to die shortwith:
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/obama-death-panels-medicare/2010/12/26/id/381043
HankD
The Obama Health Care slogan is: "Call us when you're shovel ready!"
Much of what we are experiencing is President Bush's fault although that is not to suggest this president has not added to it abundantly.Prognostication of a statement soon forthcoming from the Whitehouse:
It was Bush's Fault!!!
HankD
Much of what we are experiencing is although that is not to suggest this president has not added to it abundantly.
The US credit rating was downgraded today by S&P. Do you agree this should have happened? Why or why not? Is Obama the first President that this has ever happened under? What could have been done to stop the downgrade?
I agree. This is the natural consequence of decades of spending more than you have. Payday someday.
There is no elected official in Washington who deserves to keep their jobs.
All the incumbents need to be vacated from their positions. We need a complete, systematic change in order to rebuild the shattered American invention.
Our leaders have failed us. We deserve this.
Much of what we are experiencing is President Bush's fault although that is not to suggest this president has not added to it abundantly.
Obama will probably still win reelection - no matter what has happened or will happen.
Don't forget that it's "Bushes fault".
Besides Obama's supporters drank the koolaide a long time ago and aren't going to give up now - no matter the reality of the situation.
It certainly is not President Obama's fault alone. This day has been coming for decades. It is the free spending big government policy of the Republicrates which has brought about.
There is plenty of blame to go around.
True.
However my point is that in the context of Obama's reelection the Democrats, both in Washington and the average Democrat voter, as well as the media are going to say "It's Bush's fault" and Obama will be given credit for "it's not as bad as it would have been".