• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

US Credit rating Downgraded

Should the US credit rating have been downgraded?


  • Total voters
    13
Status
Not open for further replies.

mandym

New Member
The US credit rating was downgraded today by S&P. Do you agree this should have happened? Why or why not? Is Obama the first President that this has ever happened under? What could have been done to stop the downgrade?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
Given the way things have been handled in Washington the last few years, I am of the opinion that it was inevitable.

Oh yes,

JimmyCarter-FinallyIWontBetheWorstPresidentinHistory.jpg
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Prognostication of a statement soon forthcoming from the Whitehouse:

It was Bush's Fault!!!

HankD
 

Borneol

New Member
I believe one key area that would have stopped the credit rating down grade is reform of our entitlement programs. Enjoyed economist Thomas Sowell's article about this issue:

"How Images Of 'Poor,' 'Elderly' Distort Reality"

/www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/580251/201108021818/How-Images-Of-Poor-Elderly-Distort-Reality.htm

excerpt:

It is great political theater. But, the most fundamental reality is that the average wealth of the elderly is some multiple of the average wealth owned by people in the other age brackets.

Why should the average taxpayer be subsidizing people who have much more wealth than they do?

If we are concerned about those particular elderly people who are in fact poor — as we are about other people who are genuinely poor, whatever their age might be — then we can simply confine our help to those who are poor by some reasonable means test. It would cost a fraction of what it costs to subsidize everybody who reaches a certain age.

But the political left hates means tests. If government programs were confined to people who were genuinely poor in some meaningful sense, that would shrink the welfare state to a fraction of its current size. The left would lose their human shields.

It is certainly true that the elderly are more likely to have more medical problems and larger medical expenses. But old age is not some unforeseeable misfortune. It is not only foreseeable but inevitable for those who do not die young.

It is one thing to keep people from suffering from unforeseeable things beyond their control. But it is something else to simply subsidize their necessities so that they can spend their money on other things and leave a larger estate to be passed on to their heirs.

People who say they want a government program because "I don't want to be a burden to my children" apparently think it is all right to be a burden to other people's children.

Among the runaway spending behind our current national debt problems is the extravagant luxury of buying political rhetoric.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is certainly true that the elderly are more likely to have more medical problems and larger medical expenses. But old age is not some unforeseeable misfortune. It is not only foreseeable but inevitable for those who do not die young
Don't worry, the new Eugenics Bill (which we weren't allowed to read until after it was passed) will take care of all the Grandmas and Grandpas who refuse to die shortwith:

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/obama-death-panels-medicare/2010/12/26/id/381043

HankD
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
There is no elected official in Washington who deserves to keep their jobs.

All the incumbents need to be vacated from their positions. We need a complete, systematic change in order to rebuild the shattered American invention.

Our leaders have failed us. We deserve this.
 

freeatlast

New Member
Prognostication of a statement soon forthcoming from the Whitehouse:

It was Bush's Fault!!!

HankD
Much of what we are experiencing is President Bush's fault although that is not to suggest this president has not added to it abundantly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

freeatlast

New Member
The US credit rating was downgraded today by S&P. Do you agree this should have happened? Why or why not? Is Obama the first President that this has ever happened under? What could have been done to stop the downgrade?

Nothing could have been done. While i wish that they had taken steps to cut the budget instead of this mockery of effort the downgrade would still have happened since the steps to fix the problem will kill the country just like the steps they took Monday with the only difference being if they had taken the steps we would have fell much faster.
In fact the downgrade should have happened many moons before. The only reason it is has not is because the US has been the big boy on the street and politics. The S&P had the guts and took the steps that the other rating entities have not had. While I do think that there will be one more upswing in the markets it will not be able to sustain itself and we will fail in our obligations and lose just about everything we have.
 

freeatlast

New Member
I agree. This is the natural consequence of decades of spending more than you have. Payday someday.

Yes absolutely and it saddens me greatly to see this nation fail but our reckless attitudes and sinful ways has brought this on ourselves.
 

freeatlast

New Member
There is no elected official in Washington who deserves to keep their jobs.

All the incumbents need to be vacated from their positions. We need a complete, systematic change in order to rebuild the shattered American invention.

Our leaders have failed us. We deserve this.

I scream things like that all the time, but I actually believe the only way out of this is repentance of the church and even then we would not come away un-scorched.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Much of what we are experiencing is President Bush's fault although that is not to suggest this president has not added to it abundantly.

A few months ago, I thought Obama couldn't lose the upcoming election due to his popularity but this changes everything.

It is indeed a shared responsibilty but no matter, the sitting president will take the brunt of it "It happened on his watch" will be the Republican mantra.

Actually this probably gaurantees a Republican victory.

HankD
 

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
Hank, I agree. I thought a few months into BO's term he'd be a one-termer, but began to have doubts a few months ago. Frankly, now I think it's almost a done deal that he will be out Jan 2013. ...But the election is a long ways off.
 

targus

New Member
Obama will probably still win reelection - no matter what has happened or will happen.

Don't forget that it's "Bushes fault".

Besides Obama's supporters drank the koolaide a long time ago and aren't going to give up now - no matter the reality of the situation.
 

NaasPreacher (C4K)

Well-Known Member
Obama will probably still win reelection - no matter what has happened or will happen.

Don't forget that it's "Bushes fault".
Besides Obama's supporters drank the koolaide a long time ago and aren't going to give up now - no matter the reality of the situation.

It certainly is not President Obama's fault alone. This day has been coming for decades. It is the free spending big government policy of the Republicrates which has brought about.

There is plenty of blame to go around.
 

targus

New Member
It certainly is not President Obama's fault alone. This day has been coming for decades. It is the free spending big government policy of the Republicrates which has brought about.

There is plenty of blame to go around.

True.

However my point is that in the context of Obama's reelection the Democrats, both in Washington and the average Democrat voter, as well as the media are going to say "It's Bush's fault" and Obama will be given credit for "it's not as bad as it would have been".
 

NaasPreacher (C4K)

Well-Known Member
True.

However my point is that in the context of Obama's reelection the Democrats, both in Washington and the average Democrat voter, as well as the media are going to say "It's Bush's fault" and Obama will be given credit for "it's not as bad as it would have been".

Gotcha. You may be right there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top