1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What is Sarah Palin? Why She's A Neocon Co-optuer Of Course.

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by poncho, Feb 7, 2010.

  1. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hardly anyone ever heard of Tea parties till last summer, after the new whiz-bang healthcare reform bill was being written.

    Aug 5, 2009- “Indiana Dem Rep Brad Ellsworth concluded that Tea Party activists were likely to hijack the event by shouting about health care, so he postponed the public appearance.”

    Jul. 23 2009 How a Local Rally For Obama's Health Care Proposal Turned Into a Rally Against It…"I'm just amazed they are so strong in what their beliefs are," Anderson said of the Tea Party members. "With people being without health care, it's just hard to imagine people could be so against the plan [President] Obama is trying to put in place."…Tea Party-hearties also showed up to health-care legislation rallies in Austin and in San Antonio.


    Aug 10, 2009 – “The battle raging over President Obama's health care plan has spread from across the aisles in Congress to across the country… But disruptive protests are turning town hall meetings into shouting matches and drowning out discussion over what is and isn't in health care plans in the House and Senate.”


    Jul 23, 2009 – Pike Residents Protest Obama’s Socialized Medicine Plan. “President Obama has devastated the economy, the unemployment rate is through the roof and now he is going to devastate our health-care system.”


    And so on and so on. The protests at the town halls were mostly senior citizens concerned about Obamacare. Now the NWO/Truther folks claim it as their own and warn everybody about Palin. Sorry about that. Palin was invited to speak, and she did.
     
  2. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    That's something I sure don't understand. Why TP's would invite a Jr. neocon like Palin to speak. The neo's all war all the time platform is about as un-american and anti freedom as it gets.

    Yeah I know killing those evil muslims and remaking the middle east into a compliant subject of the 'international community" (global bankers and corporitos) sure feels good but it's costing us our republic.

    Continual warfare is death to freedom. The two just don't mix.

    In the end it matters not who started what. What matters is who will stop Washington DC from driving the final nail in the USA's coffin.

    Palin is not that person.
     
    #42 poncho, Feb 20, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 20, 2010
  3. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,997
    Likes Received:
    1,488
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Amen! :thumbs:
     
  4. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, traditional center-right Americans (the tea-partiers of last summer) like a strong military and foreign policy. They like the benefits that they paid into all their working years and don't want new super-duper entitlements that would suck up all the money in order to cover a few million illegal immigrants. Nobody wants continual warfare, but when in a war they want it to be completed successfully. I don't believe Palin is running for anything.

    The neo-isolationists are making their arguments. Only problem is so many of them seem to bring along their Bilderberg/NWO baggage. There is a limited demand for that stuff. And the other thing is that they sound just like Democrats. The Dems won the presidency, the House, and the Senate, and yet all they can do is point the finger at Bush and the Neocons.
     
  5. poncho

    poncho Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    I agree with having a strong military but our current imperial foreign policy is killing our economy. Which is fine if you prefer to live in a country that has a military/surveillance/prison economy.

    Nobody wants continual warfare? Apparently you haven't been listening to the neo's and their friends very carefully. That's all they talk about. War, wars and more war. And not only that but there is a difference between war and nation building. In a war you're protecting yourself, in nation building you do "regime change" and "rebuilding" and pre emptive strikes. Setting up compliant governments who will take their orders from the Washington, New York and London elites.

    Neo isolationists? You lost me on this one.

    Isn't it the neocons and their democratic cohorts who are always calling to isolate nations with sanctions and threats of invasion? They're the real isolationists.

    The original American foreign policy, the one our founders recommended was one of non intervention.

    As far as the NWO goes. Pick up a newspaper and read what all the "world leaders" are calling for everyday NS. It's pretty apparent from their own words a one world government is their goal. You see it's just TPers take what these "world leaders" say about it a bit more serious than y'all seem too.

    It's not that there is no push for world government, it's just that you'd rather ignore it for one reason or another. My guess is because you've been marinated in red white and blue corporate propaganda for so long you just will not allow yourself to see what's right in front of you.

    Look NS, the globalists won the WH, the house and the senate a long time ago. What you see up there on the stage and in front of the cameras are not real Americans. They're internationalists who understand that to have a true one world government the USA must fall.

    And what better way to make is so than continual warfare?
     
    #45 poncho, Feb 21, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 21, 2010
  6. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0


    I’ve heard plenty of talk about defending ourselves from terrorism. The old saying "the best defense is a good offense" has a lot of truth to it. Of course you think terrorism is false and merely staged by the NWO folks so there is no use discussing that point with you.

    We set up compliant governments? Practically no nation that we’ve ever helped has remained pro-American for very long. They do what they think is best for themselves. The best we can hope for is that they engage in representative government and leave their neighbors alone.



    I see you have an inventive new definition for the word.



    It is true that there are those among the educated elites who want world organizations to hem in the US with their soft power. Generally it is those on the left who want this. But not many voters will go along with the theories you push; centuries of Illuminati/NWO plots, and Bush was part of it. Some buy it but not many
     
    #46 NiteShift, Feb 22, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 22, 2010
Loading...