Whatever happened to Republicans standing up for clean air?

[Crabtownboy]

False question. Not answering it.

And we're still waiting for you to back up your numbers on the other thread.

As so often happens when you are shown that your stance is one that cannot be defended without showing how little you care for people you refuse to answer questions and blow smoke about other replies and threads.

What is wrong with protection peoples health?

Why are profits more important than people?

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Because they know the global warming models were fraudulent.
Because they see right through the fear mongering of the atheist left.
Because the regulations hurt the poor.

 

[Judith]

The GOP motto now is politics and profits before people.

Sen. Mitch McConnell, Senate Republican leader. He once said: “I had to choose between cleaner air and the status quo. I chose cleaner air.” Now, he decries efforts to cut carbon emissions..

Since I have little respect for either party the slander means little to me. I do however prefer truth regardless of what the topic is. I will say that I am not so sure that those numbers are correct, but I certainly agree that we need clean air. No one wants our country to be like China. Also we have come a long way in the effort and to suggest that some party is against it is just a little over the top when they have been voting for it.
Usually clean air is linked to global warming. Here is a good video on it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdxaxJNs15s

 

[Bro. Curtis]

]As so often happens when you are shown that your stance is one that cannot be defended without showing how little you care for people you refuse to answer questions and blow smoke about other replies and threads.

What is wrong with protection peoples health?

Why are profits more important than people?

You're the one who can't back up your claims.

And I have not said profits are more important than people, so stop that lie.

You set up a false question, that's why you're not getting an answer you like.

 

[InTheLight]

Oh, the evidence from the past 50 years is there.

However, the question is why have the Republicans changed their position now from protection to allowing increased degradation of the environment? There is no question that will result in more health issues for many people.

Why do you think they changed?

I've already answered:

More likely is that Republicans oppose overly restrictive government regulations without solid scientific proof that the regulations would be effective.

 

[Revmitchell]

As so often happens when you are shown that your stance is one that cannot be defended without showing how little you care for people you refuse to answer questions and blow smoke about other replies and threads.

What is wrong with protection peoples health?

Why are profits more important than people?

Why does Obama hate the poor?

 

[InTheLight]

Why does Obama hate the poor?

Touche!...

 

[Crabtownboy]

Why does Obama hate the poor?

]Why is protecting their health hating them?

Why are you not concerned about the health of the poor .... or anyone else?

 

[Revmitchell]

]Why is protecting their health hating them?

Why are you not concerned about the health of the poor .... or anyone else?

Why do you hate the poor?

 

[padredurand]

]Why is protecting their health hating them?

Why are you not concerned about the health of the poor .... or anyone else?

What Republican pushed legislation that would increase air and water pollution? What legislation was passed with the intent of increasing asthma attacks? What Republican has ever pushed for a dirty environment?

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Why is protecting their health hating them?

How is asking for proof of your claims not protecting them ?

Why are you not concerned about the health of the poor .... or anyone else?

Why do you want to keep them poor ?

 

[Crabtownboy]

How is asking for proof of your claims not protecting them ?

Prove me wrong.

Why do you want to keep them poor ?

I don't. That is one of the reasons I quit the Republican Party. It became obvious the GOP was racist, playing the Southern Policy card and cared nothing for the poor, the ill or children as well as declaring war on everyone other then rich folk, especially white men.

So, I answered your question. Now answer mine. Which is more important your electrical bill or the health of children and adults with asthma?

 

[Crabtownboy]

Because they know the global warming models were fraudulent.

Prove it.

Because they see right through the fear mongering of the atheist left.

Prove it.

Because the regulations hurt the poor.

And no regulations with higher pollution would help them?

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Prove me wrong.

Stupid challenge. You have not put up any stats to back up your claim, therefore, I cannot make a point by point argument against them. One cannot debate arbitrary figures. Surely, being a well-read intellectual, you would know this, by now.

I don't. That is one of the reasons I quit the Republican Party. It became obvious the GOP was racist, playing the Southern Policy card and cared nothing for the poor, the ill or children as well as declaring war on everyone other then rich folk, especially white men.

Rant. Anecdotal evidence is not evidence. Nobody cares about your personal views, they want provable facts.

So, I answered your question. Now answer mine. Which is more important your electrical bill or the health of children and adults with asthma?

Stupid question. You have not shown any correlation between anyone's electric bill and anyone's asthma.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Because they know the global warming models were fraudulent.

Prove it.

I don't have to. Other good folks have.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/30/driessen-a-model-for-climate-change-fraud/?page=all

http://joannenova.com.au/2013/12/sk...tion-lies-and-exploition-says-maurice-newman/
(Actually, Australia has dumped their climate change agenda, because they see the fraud)

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/...e-epa-from-agencys-top-paid-climate-official/

(There's a lot of info in that last link, it's going to take you a while)

Prove it.

I don't have to. You see the push-back right before your very eyes, don't you ?

And no regulations with higher pollution would help them?

An easing of regulations sure would help, and since you still haven't shown us any science behind this, I reject your claim that there would be more pollution than there is right now, and I certainly reject your claim that anyone WANTS more pollution.

 

[Crabtownboy]

I don't have to. Other good folks have.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/30/driessen-a-model-for-climate-change-fraud/?page=all

http://joannenova.com.au/2013/12/sk...tion-lies-and-exploition-says-maurice-newman/
(Actually, Australia has dumped their climate change agenda, because they see the fraud)

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/...e-epa-from-agencys-top-paid-climate-official/

(There's a lot of info in that last link, it's going to take you a while)


I don't have to. You see the push-back right before your very eyes, don't you ?



An easing of regulations sure would help, and since you still haven't shown us any science behind this, I reject your claim that there would be more pollution than there is right now, and I certainly reject your claim that anyone WANTS more pollution.

Totally irrational reply.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Yup. That's C.T.Boy talk for "way too many facts".

:laugh::laugh::laugh: