1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Which MVs are AV1611s?

Discussion in '2005 Archive' started by manchester, Mar 14, 2005.

Top Posters
  1. manchester

    manchester New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know that there are many Bibles, made in the 1700s and 1800s, that are called "AV1611s."

    1) Is the NIV also a "AV1611"?

    2) Is the NKJV a "AV1611"?

    3) How many Bibles, differing in doctrine and text from the KJV of 1611, are "KJV 1611s" or "AV1611s"?
     
    #1 manchester, Mar 14, 2005
  2. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    No to all your question.

    The KJV1769 Edition is the 'AV1611';
    The KJV1611 editon is NOT the 'AV1611'.
    These definitions vary from place to place
    and author to author.
     
    #2 Ed Edwards, Mar 14, 2005
  3. Baptist in Richmond

    Baptist in Richmond Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    5,122
    Likes Received:
    19
    The Authorised Version of 1611 is the only AV1611. This is the true "King James Bible," and contains more than 66 Books. Reproduction copies are readily available.

    BiR
     
    #3 Baptist in Richmond, Mar 14, 2005
  4. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    An electronic KJV1611 edition
    is also available from
    e-sword -- click here
     
    #4 Ed Edwards, Mar 14, 2005
  5. manchester

    manchester New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is it bearing false witness to say you used the AV1611 if you use the NKJV?

    Is it bearing false witness to say you used the AV1611 if you use the KJV 1769?
     
    #5 manchester, Mar 15, 2005
  6. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, they are two different versions.

    Yes, they are two different versions.

    tee hee,
    I got invited to leave a board today with:
    ------------------------
    Ed Edwards wrote:

    Mat 13:57 (KJV1611 Edition):
    And they were offended in him. But Iesus said vnto them,
    A Prophet is not without honour, saue in his owne
    countrey, and in his owne house


    But the Authorized version reads:

    Quote:
    ------------------------------
    57 And they were offended in him. But Jesus said unto them,
    A prophet is not without honour, save in his own
    country, and in his own house.
    58 And he did not many mighty works
    there because of their unbelief.

    --------------------------------
    In fact, that KJV1611 was authorized by King James I of England;
    that KJV1769 was NOT authorized by King
    James I of England.

    Of course, by the time to get to KJVO#5
    the KJV1769 edition is the only one
    authorized BY GOD ;)
     
    #6 Ed Edwards, Mar 16, 2005
  7. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,285
    Likes Received:
    507
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No Modern Version, including any called the "King James", are truly AV1611. There are hundreds of significant changes that preclude them being called by that name.

    It is a sad fact that most churches that proclaim themselves 'AV1611' actually do not use that translation and are ARE deceptive.
     
    #7 Dr. Bob, Mar 16, 2005
  8. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, Brother Dr. Bob -- Preach it! [​IMG]

    markin' ....
     
    #8 Ed Edwards, Mar 17, 2005
  9. stevec

    stevec New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2004
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    0
    I second that Amen!
     
    #9 stevec, Mar 22, 2005
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Loading...