Why I do what I do the way I do it

Really? Where has Luke2427 called anyone an heretic? Can you give a link to that, if not, let's just call this an accusation that is unfounded, and one that necessitates a Christian apology, OK?

You should've already been in prayer for the church the Lord has given him to pastor, and for all saints already.

Luke2427 is zealous for truth. Honestly, I cannot say I have garnered much learning, nor actual theological fodder from any of your posts to my recollection. Do you have anything edifying to add here? Yes? No?

 

Oh, you haven't heard?

 

'KJVO is, in my opinion, heresy. It is indicative of the corruption that, apparently, well nigh permeates "fundamentalism."' http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=74866

No one is forcing you to read my posts. All I read from you is your cheerleading drivel after Luke posts.

 

I take that as a "no" in answer to my question.

 

Funny how you said to me "Can you give a link to that, if not, let's just call this an accusation that is unfounded, and one that necessitates a Christian apology, OK?", and then just ignore that I gave a link where your hero did just what I said he did. Where's the apology for your unfounded accusation?

 

In that link he didn't call any person an heretic anymore than you did. Relax matt, you're getting twisted over a forum. Chill.

 

Sigh.

Bragging? Who said you were bragging?



I gave the link to what you said. You gave NOTHING to support your false charge against me.

 

I'm not twisted. I'm a happy camper and having a great time.

You are right..he didn't call any one person a heretic. He called an entire group of people heretics.

 

He's just got a guilty conscience is all...

 

Not really, he called the teachings heresy. There's a difference. All Christians have some teaching that is probably borderline heresy (false). Thankfully this is not determinitive upon ones salvation.

 

You Calvinists are so used to twisting words that you do it automatically on just about every subject you speak on. I can't keep track of when I should plainly understand what you are saying or when I should look for the deeper meaning.

If a group of people follow a teaching that is heretical, that would make them heretics in my (and most people's) books. I guess when you are running apologetic for Luke though you need to twist some things around.

 

Many years ago I saw a boxing match from Mexico. One fellow was an accomplished boxer, the other fellow looked like an beginner. It was the funniest fight I've ever seen, the inexperienced fighter was very aggressive, but the good boxer kept knocking him flat. But... they had no knockdown rule, and this fellow would hop up and go after the good boxer again. Within seconds he would get knocked flat again. This went on for about six rounds, they finally stopped the fight so the bad fighter wouldn't get himself killed. It was a hoot.

These debates remind me of that fight, the Cals keep getting knocked flat, but they are not smart enough to stay down.

By the way, I am King James only, does that mean Luke is calling me a heretic?

 

That could be said about much of what you say, so you need to concentrate on policing your own self and quit taking up for others.

BTW, I do feel for Luke's congregation, but if that is what they think constitutes a good pastor, it's all on them.

 

Let me see if I got this right...if you are KJVO you are a heretic and in "darkness"...but if you believe and teach that God ordains, desires, decrees sin you are teaching orthodox Christianity?

Hyper cal's calling anything heresy should be taken with a grain of salt.

 

"Alas, alas, many make an iron ring of their doctrines and he who dares to step beyond that narrow circle is not reckoned orthodox. God bless heretics, then! God send us more of them! Many make theology into a kind of tread wheel consisting of five doctrines which are everlastingly rotated. For they never go on to anything else." —Charles Spurgeon, "Preach the Gospel"