• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Wu Hand Luke

SGO

Well-Known Member
The Epoch Times encourages sharing of their articles SGO

Newly-Released Documents Detail US-Funded Coronavirus Research at Wuhan Institute of Virology: Report

Newly-Released Documents Detail US-Funded Coronavirus Research at Wuhan Institute of Virology: Report
By Katabella Roberts

September 7, 2021 Updated: September 7, 2021
Print
New documents have been released detailing U.S.-funded research on various types of coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, where the first outbreak of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus occurred.
 

Andre

Well-Known Member
The Epoch Times encourages sharing of their articles SGO

Newly-Released Documents Detail US-Funded Coronavirus Research at Wuhan Institute of Virology: Report

Newly-Released Documents Detail US-Funded Coronavirus Research at Wuhan Institute of Virology: Report
By Katabella Roberts

September 7, 2021 Updated: September 7, 2021
Print
New documents have been released detailing U.S.-funded research on various types of coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, where the first outbreak of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus occurred.
And what is the concern here? If you have any evidence that the US ever knowingly, or through negligence, in any way contributed to the origin of the covid pandemic, please present it.

You wouldn't be implying something that you have no evidence for, would you?
 

SGO

Well-Known Member
What is the evidence for the lie? It is your claim, you bear the responsibility to point to the place in the article where some actual evidence is presented.

"What is the evidence for the lie?"

Hey Andre, you are calling me a liar, right?

The article I posted is dated today and you could have looked at the other link that was mentioned.

Documentation will be coming if they stay on the story.
 
Last edited:

Andre

Well-Known Member
"What is the evidence for the lie?"

Hey Andre, you are calling me a liar, right?

The article I posted is dated today and you could have looked at the other link that was mentioned.

Documentation will be coming if they stay on the story.
Again, where is the evidence please?

Once more: you made a claim that Dr. Fauci lied and simply provided a link as your supporting evidence. I can find nothing in the article that makes a real case that Fauci lied. And, no, having someone simply assert that he lied is not an argument.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Again, where is the evidence please?

Once more: you made a claim that Dr. Fauci lied and simply provided a link as your supporting evidence. I can find nothing in the article that makes a real case that Fauci lied. And, no, having someone simply assert that he lied is not an argument.

and you simply saying he didn’t lie is not an argument. And from what I’ve seen of your posts it’s the best you can do.
 

Andre

Well-Known Member
and you simply saying he didn’t lie is not an argument. And from what I’ve seen of your posts it’s the best you can do.
It is the person making the accusation that bears the burden of proof!

You guys are accusing Dr. Fauci of lying!! It is certainly not my job to prove he did not. Besides, it is unfair to be asked to prove a negative.

The bottom line is this: all we have seen from you guys are links. And when I ask for the specifics, you dance.

This "post-a-link-and-run" strategy is a tried and true one - one seeks out a provocative headline that supports one's position and one posts it without actually reading it and understanding what it says.
 

SGO

Well-Known Member
It is the person making the accusation that bears the burden of proof!

You guys are accusing Dr. Fauci of lying!! It is certainly not my job to prove he did not. Besides, it is unfair to be asked to prove a negative.

The bottom line is this: all we have seen from you guys are links. And when I ask for the specifics, you dance.

This "post-a-link-and-run" strategy is a tried and true one - one seeks out a provocative headline that supports one's position and one posts it without actually reading it and understanding what it says.


"It is the person making the accusation that bears the burden of proof."

You are calling me a liar.
 

SGO

Well-Known Member
Grant's Tomb

The Epoch Times encourages sharing of their articles. SGO
Internal Documents Raise Questions on US Grants to China: House Lawmakers

Internal Documents Raise Questions on US Grants to China: House Lawmakers

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), the ranking minority member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and two other Republican representatives, are pressing Dr. Anthony Fauci for answers, after newly disclosed documents revealed that U.S. money went to China for coronavirus research.

Among the documents, obtained by The Intercept through the Freedom of Information Act, was a previously unpublished grant proposal titled, “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” outlined by Peter Daszak, president of U.S.-based health organization EcoHealth Alliance.

The National Institute of Health (NIH) awarded the grant—totaling $3.1 million for five years from 2014 to 2019—to EcoHealth.

A portion of the grant money, $599,000, was directed to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) for research, including altering bat coronaviruses that were deemed likely to infect humans.

The disclosure seems to contradict claims by Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and NIH Director Dr. Francis Collin—both have said that the grants did not back gain-of-function research.

“These NIH grant documents further indicate that Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins have broken trust with the American people,” said Rodgers, Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), and Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.), according to a statement released on Sept. 7.

“For months, Dr. Fauci dismissed any consideration of the lab leak theory despite, or perhaps because of, his agency’s involvement in risky coronavirus research at the Wuhan lab. Dr. Collins has repeatedly denied what these documents now show,” the lawmakers added.

Guthrie is the leading Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Health Subcommittee. Griffith is the leading Republican on the Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

The WIV, home to one of China’s highest-level biosafety P4 laboratories, has been under scrutiny for being the source of the virus. It is located only miles away from a seafood market where the first clusters of patients infected by COVID-19, a disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, emerged.

Beijing has denied any suggestions to link the virus origin with a lab leak at the WIV. Instead, it has thrown its weight behind a natural zoonotic hypothesis—that the virus was transmitted to humans from an animal host.

A State Department fact sheet released in January said it had reason to believe that “several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses.”

A U.S. intelligence report, which was released on Aug. 27, stated that it couldn’t come to a conclusive assessment about the pandemic’s origins, given China’s refusal to cooperate.

“If NIH, NIAID, and EcoHealth Alliance had been transparent about research being conducted at the Wuhan lab from the beginning, perhaps it would have aided in our response to the global pandemic,” the three lawmakers stated.

“The American people deserve answers,” they added. “These documents raise more questions about what kind of risky research Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins have been funding and what other information they refuse to give us.”

“We will continue our pursuit of the truth and will not stop until we get answers the American people deserve,” the lawmakers said.

Other lawmakers have since also raised questions in connection to the documents, including Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), and Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pa.).

“It’s time Daszak comes clean & stops covering for the Chinese Communist Party,” Reschenthaler wrote on Twitter.

Evidence suggests that Daszak has ties to the Chinese regime. At a 2018 conference sponsored by Chinese state broadcaster CGTN, he revealed that EcoHealth received funding from Beijing. CGTN is the international arm of China’s state broadcaster CCTV.

Daszak and spokespersons for the NIH and NIAID did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
 

SGO

Well-Known Member
Next witness,
From the Left:

White House embraces “Wuhan Lab” conspiracy theory
Bryan Dyne
26 May 2021


On Wednesday, US President Joe Biden publicly embraced the conspiracy theory that COVID-19 may have been released from China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), ordering the US intelligence agencies to produce a report within 90 days into the potentially man-made origins of the disease.

White House embraces “Wuhan Lab” conspiracy theory
 
Top