Your questions on Indiana's RFRA answered.

[Bro. Curtis]

Pull quote…

"….Until now, the most controversial RFRA case was last year’s Hobby Lobby v. Burwell, which was about whether the federal government has a compelling interest in forcing religious business owners to pay for abortifacents. (It doesn’t.)

This big gay freak-out is purely notional. No RFRA has ever been used successfully to defend anti-gay discrimination, not in twenty years of RFRAs nationwide.


http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/30/your-questions-on-indianas-religious-freedom-bill-answered/

 

[church mouse guy]

George Stephanopoulos served under Clinton when the federal law was passed and he never said a word about Clinton.

Indiana lawyer Eric Miller, a former candidate for Governor, said this:

​

　

•Christian bakers, florists and photographers should not be punished for refusing to participate in a homosexual marriage!

•A Christian business should not be punished for refusing to allow a man to use the women’s restroom!

•A church should not be punished because they refuse to let the church be used for a homosexual wedding!

http://www.advanceamerica.com/downloads.html