• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Maine voters repeal gay-marriage law

Status
Not open for further replies.

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
PORTLAND, Maine - Maine voters repealed a state law Tuesday that would have allowed same-sex couples to wed, dealing the gay rights movement a heartbreaking defeat in New England, the corner of the country most supportive of gay marriage.

Gay marriage has now lost in every single state — 31 in all — in which it has been put to a popular vote. Gay-rights activists had hoped to buck that trend in Maine — known for its moderate, independent-minded electorate — and mounted an energetic, well-financed campaign.

With 87 percent of the precincts reporting, gay-marriage foes had 53 percent of the votes.
Story continues below ↓advertisement | your ad here

"The institution of marriage has been preserved in Maine and across the nation," declared Frank Schubert, chief organizer for the winning side.


More Here
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
Glad to hear it. Now if we could just get the government out of the marriage business all together so that a God-ordained institution was not a political ping pong ball.
 

Johnv

New Member
I had predicted this trend around the time we in CA voted on Prop 8. That said, more and more people are sharing KenH's view, that marriage is a private matter, and should not be a state entitlement. There's a lot of logic to that position.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Doesn'tmatter.

Some activist judge, or court, will take care of that minor problem.
 

Johnv

New Member
No so, carpro. CA is notorious for having some of the most liberal state supreme court judges, and they have so far upheld Prop 8. As long as the states in question have a solidly written law, then it they won't be overturned.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
Glad to hear it. Now if we could just get the government out of the marriage business all together so that a God-ordained institution was not a political ping pong ball.
Marriage is a matter of law. Government can't be out of it.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No so, carpro. CA is notorious for having some of the most liberal state supreme court judges, and they have so far upheld Prop 8. As long as the states in question have a solidly written law, then it they won't be overturned.

Hide and watch. To some activist judges, state laws are not worth the paper they are written on.

It's been done before.
 

Nonsequitur

New Member
Glad to hear it. Now if we could just get the government out of the marriage business all together so that a God-ordained institution was not a political ping pong ball.

Agreed!
There is a reason that it is called 'Holy Matrimony'.
Only the government decided to call it a 'civil union'.
PING....................................................PONG.
 

Johnv

New Member
Caesar has the responsibility to protect marriage.
Legal marriage is not biblical marriage, and never has been. Legal marriage is nothign more than a legal contract. Biblical marriage is a sacred covenant. Ceasar can only enforce a legal contract. Ceasar cannot enforce sacred covenants. In fact, Ceasar has no business whatsoever enforcing sacred covenants.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
"Thou shalt not steal" is no less a Divine institution than "thou shalt not commit adultery." Caesar is charged by God to protect marriage.
 

Johnv

New Member
"Thou shalt not steal" is no less a Divine institution than "thou shalt not commit adultery." Caesar is charged by God to protect marriage.
"Thou shalt not covet" and "Thou shalt not worship a graven image" are no less a divine institutions, yet no reasonable individual would advocate legislating those. Caesar is not charged by God to protect marriage, nor is Ceasar charged by God to enforce any other law found in scripture.
 

Marcia

Active Member
Every place the word, "marriage," appears in a law, replace it with "personal contract."

Whether it's called a contract or civil union, it is essentially marriage and will be seen that way and treated that way legally. I cannot support any legal se*ual union of homose*ual partners, which is what it would be.

And if we take marriage out of the law and just have churches, so what? Where does that leave us? Unitarian churches, United Church of Christ, Episcopal, liberal Methodist, Bapitist, Lutheran, and many, many other churches will perform marriages for same sex couples.
 

Johnv

New Member
Whether it's called a contract or civil union, it is essentially marriage and will be seen that way and treated that way legally. I cannot support any legal se*ual union of homose*ual partners, which is what it would be.
A civil union IS a contract already, and no, it's not marriage (marriage isn't a contract, it's a covenant). It gets the governmetn out of peoples' private lives, and gets them out of the marriage business.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
What of divorce, child custody, and property?

The state has a vested interest in protecting marriage. You wouldn't want to live in a state that didn't.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
"Thou shalt not covet" and "Thou shalt not worship a graven image" are no less a divine institutions, yet no reasonable individual would advocate legislating those. Caesar is not charged by God to protect marriage, nor is Ceasar charged by God to enforce any other law found in scripture.
The status of divine institution is not the determining factor on whether the government can enforce or protect a thing. Government itself is a divine institution. He is the minister of God.
 

Johnv

New Member
What of divorce, child custody, and property?
Civil unions deal with property (in fact, it's a major reason to have a civil union). Parental rights aren't determined by civil unions.
The status of divine institution is not the determining factor on whether the government can enforce or protect a thing.
Legal marriage isn't a divine institution, so it's apples and oranges.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top