Rush to marry again

[targus]

Limbaugh goes to the Dominican Republic with Viagra. What do you think Rush was doing?

Viagra is also used to treat pulmonary hypertension.

But that probably isn't in your realm of personal experience.

 

[saturneptune]

Viagra is also used to treat pulmonary hypertension.

But that probably isn't in your realm of personal experience.

Your posts are beyond pathetic.

 

[targus]

Your posts are beyond pathetic.

How so?

Please explain.

 

[Robert Snow]

Viagra is also used to treat pulmonary hypertension.

I don't think even someone like you believes that Limbaugh had Viagra for this reason. But, good try! :laugh:

 

[Crabtownboy]

Viagra is not market as Viagra for pulmonary hypertension. It is relabeled as Revatio. What Rush had was illegal.

Rush Limbaugh could see a deal with prosecutors in a long-running prescription fraud case collapse after authorities found a bottle of Viagra in his bag at Palm Beach International Airport. The prescription was not in his name.

Limbaugh was detained for more than three hours Monday at the airport after returning from a vacation in the Dominican Republic. Customs officials found the Viagra in his luggage but his name was not on the prescription, said Paul Miller, a spokesman for the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office.

Miller said the alleged violation could be a second-degree misdemeanor. The sheriff's office was investigating and will soon turn the case over to the state attorney's office, which had no immediate comment Tuesday.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/06/27/national/main1753947.shtml

He joked about it and said:

He later added, chuckling: "I had a great time in the Dominican Republic. Wish I could tell you about it. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,201065,00.html

Does that statement tell you anything about what he might have been doing in the DR?

 

[Baptist Believer]

Does that statement tell you anything about what he might have been doing in the DR?

Not really.

I don't listen to Limbaugh much (he irritates me), but he doesn't often tell much about his travels, except when he plays in gold tournaments or does public appearances.

The folks who assumes he is cavorting with prostitutes seem to be intentionally assuming the worst.

Listen, I'm not a Limbaugh fan, but we need to have a higher standard here.

 

[Crabtownboy]

Not really.

I don't listen to Limbaugh much (he irritates me), but he doesn't often tell much about his travels, except when he plays in gold tournaments or does public appearances.

The folks who assumes he is cavorting with prostitutes seem to be intentionally assuming the worst.

Listen, I'm not a Limbaugh fan, but we need to have a higher standard here.

1. The Viagra is illegal. It was not his prescription.
2. It was not Revatio, which is Viagra to treat pulmonary hypertension.

Now why would he have illegal Viagra? Let's not get sleazy, but it is pretty obvious and it wasn't for pulmonary hypertension.

I have no idea if he was being entertained by ladies of the night. But it seems pretty obvous he was cavorting or at least wanted to do so.

I do not know much about his new wife. However, she has been a long time defender of gay rights. That is well known. Maybe with research we can find out a bit more about this lady.

 

[targus]

I don't think even someone like you believes that Limbaugh had Viagra for this reason. But, good try! :laugh:

I took no position either way.

You asked for other possibilities while assuming that there were none.

I gave you one.

You have no idea what the truth of the matter is - only your biased opinions.

 

[Crabtownboy]

I took no position either way.

You asked for other possibilities while assuming that there were none.

I gave you one.

Of course you took sides. You tried to cast doubt and engaged in misdirection by mentioning pulmonary hypertension.

You failed to mention the Viagra he had was illegal.

You have no idea what the truth of the matter is - only your biased opinions.

Your posts show you are the one with the problem you mention in this quote.

Why do you believe he had illegal Viagra with him?

Do you believe he is a moral person?

Would you trust your daughter, assuming you have one, to travel alone with him? I certainly would not.

 

[targus]

1. The Viagra is illegal. It was not his prescription.
2. It was not Revatio, which is Viagra to treat pulmonary hypertension.

Now why would he have illegal Viagra? Let's not get sleazy, but it is pretty obvious and it wasn't for pulmonary hypertension.

I have no idea if he was being entertained by ladies of the night. But it seems pretty obvous he was cavorting or at least wanted to do so.

I do not know much about his new wife. However, she has been a long time defender of gay rights. That is well known. Maybe with research we can find out a bit more about this lady.

How do you know that it was illegal?

Different countries have different prescription drug laws.

What is the law in the Dominican Republic concerning Viagra?

I doubt that you have even the faintest knowledge - but that does not slow you down one bit in your casting of aspersions.

Another example of you exercising your Christian values?

 

[targus]

Of course you took aides. You tried to cast doubt and engaged in misdirection by mentioning pulmonary hypertension.

I took aides?

What does that even mean?

I provided a simple direct answer to a question.

You failed to mention the Viagra he had was illegal..

And you know this how?

What are the relevant drug prescription laws in the Dominican Republic?

Your posts show you are the one with the problem you mention in this quote.

Why do you believe he had illegal Viagra with him?

I don't know that it was illegal.

I don't know what he had it for.

You are the one making accusations.

I am merely asking for your proof.

 

[Crabtownboy]

How do you know that it was illegal?

The articles say so. And it is illegal to carry a prescription that does not have your name on it!

Different countries have different prescription drug laws.

What country was the prescription from? Why did it not have his name on it?

What is the law in the Dominican Republic concerning Viagra?

It does not matter. He was entering the United States. He is a US citizen. He violated US law.

I doubt that you have even the faintest knowledge - but that does not slow you down one bit in your casting of aspersions.

Or your silly dodges and foggy questions of misdirection.

Another example of you exercising your Christian values?

Ah, here we go again. You know you are wrong, but are not man enough to admit it, so you attempt to insult.

 

[targus]

The articles say so. And it is illegal to carry a prescription that does not have your name on it!

What country was the prescription from? Why did it not have his name on it?

It does not matter. He was entering the United States. He is a US citizen. He violated US law.

If he declared it and surrendered it at customs no law was broken.

Or your silly dodges and foggy questions of misdirection.

What dodge - what misdirection? Asking you to back up your accusations?

Ah, here we go again. You know you are wrong, but are not man enough to admit it, so you attempt to insult.

Wrong about what?

 

[Crabtownboy]

If he declared it and surrendered it at customs no law was broken.

What makes you think he declared it? Do you ever do any research or reading? It appears not as you simply spout opinion and silly misdirection replies.

Limbaugh was detained for more than three hours Monday at the airport after returning from a vacation in the Dominican Republic. Customs officials found the Viagra in his luggage but his name was not on the prescription, said Paul Miller, a spokesman for the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office.

See the words customs agents found. Note it does not say that he declared the Viagra.

And, in fact, you are quite wrong. If a person declares an item and it is illegal then it will be taken away from him. That is the best case in this regard. Depending on the substance the person could be in trouble.

When you enter a country you are entering under their laws. That is why if I had certain prescriptions that are legal here and I was entering the Czech Republic I would need a doctor's letter stating that I had a need for these medications. Even if I had a prescription for these particular medications, but no letter I would be violating Czech law and be in trouble. Fortunately the prescriptions I require do not fall under these provisions. So, I do not need to bother the doctor for a letter.








What dodge - what misdirection? Asking you to back up your accusations?

You seldom answer questions and you often attempt to misdirect with opinion that is almost never backed up.



Wrong about what?[/QUOTE]

Just about everything. :laugh:

 

[targus]

You seldom answer questions and you often attempt to misdirect with opinion that is almost never backed up.


What questions?

You keep saying that I haven't answered your question - but don't bother to provide the questions.

Most odd.

 

[Crabtownboy]

You seldom answer questions and you often attempt to misdirect with opinion that is almost never backed up.


What questions?

You keep saying that I haven't answered your question - but don't bother to provide the questions.

Most odd.

Did you answer any of the questions from this thread?


Questions:

What country was the prescription from? Why did it not have his name on it?

What makes you think he declared it?

Does that statement tell you anything about what he might have been doing in the DR?

I expect more out of myself than I do of anyone else. How about you?

 

[targus]

Did you answer any of the questions from this thread?

Questions:

What country was the prescription from? Why did it not have his name on it?

What makes you think he declared it?

Does that statement tell you anything about what he might have been doing in the DR?

I already stated that I have no information and no position on those things.

That is my answer.

I expect more out of myself than I do of anyone else. How about you?

I always expect far more from myself than I would ever expect from you. :tongue3:

 

[Crabtownboy]

I already stated that I have no information and no position on those things.

That is my answer.

Another dodge. Why am I not surprised?

You responded to one question with that answer.

You did not respond to any of the others. It is typical of your replies in all threads to ask question, but almost never answer, and even more seldom answer with any substance.

If you really have no information and no position on this topic, how is it you answer at all?

Do you think Rush is a moral person?

Is having three divorces and marrying a 4th wife an example of a Christian lifestyle?

Several more questions I expect you will refuse to answer.

 

[targus]

Do you think Rush is a moral person?

Is having three divorces and marrying a 4th wife an example of a Christian lifestyle?

Several more questions I expect you will refuse to answer.

Is he a moral person?

I couldn't say.

I suspect that much of what he presents on the radio is for show purposes and therefore not a real representation of him.

I suspect that much of what his critics say about him is unsubstantiated and tilted to make him look bad and therefore not a real representation of him.

Having no direct personal knowledge of him or his life I am not in a position to judge.

So I'll leave the judgements up to you since you seem to feel that you are qualified to judge him.

 

[Crabtownboy]

Is he a moral person?

I couldn't say.

Then why do you defend him so much?

I suspect that much of what he presents on the radio is for show purposes and therefore not a real representation of him.

What makes you believe this?

I suspect that much of what his critics say about him is unsubstantiated and tilted to make him look bad and therefore not a real representation of him.

Why do you believe this? Can you support your view?

Having no direct personal knowledge of him or his life I am not in a position to judge.

Why do you judge others on the BB so harshly. Do you have personal knowledge?

So I'll leave the judgements up to you since you seem to feel that you are qualified to judge him.

You judge others, why not him?