Dude, it's actually very, very simple. I want the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade; but realistically, that battle is either not going to happen, or will take a long time.It is a fruitless discussion. It might be an interesting academic discussion, but it is of absolutely no consequence.
What aspects of morality do you want the courts making decisions on and which ones do you want them to keep their nose out of?
Also if they rule Roe v. Wade unconstitutional it will not stop abortions. It will increase the number of young women who die in back alley abortion mills as was the case before Roe v. Wade.
My wife's secretary lost her mother in the 1930's in this way. Do you want that? Or are you one of those who say "She deserved it."
Should the young man who impregnated the woman be held responsible for helping her and the baby, at least economically, even if they are not married?
Would you support the SC making such a decision holding the father responsible?
ROFL. You have yet to answer my very simple question in another thread. Did or have you read the essay about Bush?
See how easy that was?