• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Activist Judges Protect Obama Care

Don

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is a fruitless discussion. It might be an interesting academic discussion, but it is of absolutely no consequence.

What aspects of morality do you want the courts making decisions on and which ones do you want them to keep their nose out of?

Also if they rule Roe v. Wade unconstitutional it will not stop abortions. It will increase the number of young women who die in back alley abortion mills as was the case before Roe v. Wade.

My wife's secretary lost her mother in the 1930's in this way. Do you want that? Or are you one of those who say "She deserved it."

Should the young man who impregnated the woman be held responsible for helping her and the baby, at least economically, even if they are not married?

Would you support the SC making such a decision holding the father responsible?

ROFL. You have yet to answer my very simple question in another thread. Did or have you read the essay about Bush?
Dude, it's actually very, very simple. I want the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade; but realistically, that battle is either not going to happen, or will take a long time.

See how easy that was?
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dude, it's actually very, very simple. I want the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade; but realistically, that battle is either not going to happen, or will take a long time.

See how easy that was?

Don, would you support a law or a SC decision making the young man financially responsible for the care of the child?

 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
Yup. This thread had nothing to do with any Bush-appointed judges. He'll also call your interpretation of scripture "liberal" if he doesn't like it.

So it does appear that the leftist judges in this case are protecting Obama. When this horrible law gets overturned it will be bacause it is unconstitutional, not because of any activism on a judge's part.
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So it does appear that the leftist judges in this case are protecting Obama. When this horrible law gets overturned it will be bacause it is unconstitutional, not because of any activism on a judge's part.

Who are these judges you keep talking about? Names please.

What rulings have they made the protect Obama?


 

mandym

New Member
What is the number of the law?
Have you ever seen it enforced?
How many infants of unwed mothers have you known who was supported by the absent father?

By the way do you feel comfortable being off topic since you complain about with so many others?
 

mandym

New Member
Totally off topic.

Please answer my question.


You have been nothing but off topic for most of your posts in this thread. And I did not make that statement. But then this is most likely just a redirection for you since you have been cornered.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
When C.T.Boy is referred to the O/P to see the names he wants, he claims it is off-topic. It is to laugh.
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
When C.T.Boy is referred to the O/P to see the names he wants, he claims it is off-topic. It is to laugh.

I responded to the OP with the comment about the SC having activist judges. You and others picked up that and highjacked the thread by posting and posting and posting about my comment. Now that you are unable to answer my questions you retread to insults, whining, etc., etc.

If you and others had not created a rabbit-track on my comment there would have been no rabbit-track discussion.

Now, what leftist judges are you speaking about? What are their names and decisions?

I replied to your question showing that Roberts and Alito have not lived up to their statements in their hearings before Congress. Then you retread to the indefensible position of simply saying they are leftist organizations. I doubt you looked any of them up, just retreated to one of your favorite, hide behind the comment positions.


So, again, have the politeness to answer my questions. I responded to yours.
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Which was off topic. I will be sure and remember your treatment of this thread in the future.

If my answer was off topic then, be definition, the question was off topic also. If you want to stay on topic do not ask off topic questions.

:laugh:
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
I responded to the OP with the comment about the SC having activist judges. You and others picked up that and highjacked the thread by posting and posting and posting about my comment. Now that you are unable to answer my questions you retread to insults, whining, etc., etc.

If you and others had not created a rabbit-track on my comment there would have been no rabbit-track discussion.

Now, what leftist judges are you speaking about? What are their names and decisions?

I replied to your question showing that Roberts and Alito have not lived up to their statements in their hearings before Congress. Then you retread to the indefensible position of simply saying they are leftist organizations. I doubt you looked any of them up, just retreated to one of your favorite, hide behind the comment positions.

So, again, have the politeness to answer my questions. I responded to yours.


There is nothing polite about you, C.T.Boy.

The names are available in the O/P. Read and learn about how leftist judges are ignoring the constitution, and choosing to protect their leader, and his criminal enterprise.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
If my answer was off topic then, be definition, the question was off topic also. If you want to stay on topic do not ask off topic questions.

:laugh:


I move that Crabtownboy is not here for honest debate, and the fact has been known for seome time.
 
Top