Huffington Post Defends Gay 'Intergenerational' Sex With Teens

[Revmitchell]

http://spectator.org/blog/57020/huffington-post-defends-gay-intergenerational-sex-teens

You will just have to go read it yourself if you have a mind too. Huffpo is a piece of trash.

 

[Crabtownboy]

http://spectator.org/blog/57020/huffington-post-defends-gay-intergenerational-sex-teens

You will just have to go read it yourself if you have a mind too. Huffpo is a piece of trash.

As you so often like to say, Only an opinion piece and of no significance. Also, instead of citing the original article you cite an opinion piece from a biased web site.

No credibility. To use your words, Spectator "is a piece of trash".

I do not agree with the writer at the Huffpo. I think he is wrong!

 

[thisnumbersdisconnected]

Does defending HuffPo but condemning the writer constitute backdoor endorsement of the article?

 

[Revmitchell]

Huffpo published that piece of trash. Nough said

 

[Aaron]

As you so often like to say, Only an opinion piece and of no significance.

An opinion by one of the editors.

Admit it, ma'am, you agree with him.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

I saw nothing in the article that says it's OK to have g@y s3x with teenagers. 19 years old is considered an adult in every state in the nation.

 

[thisnumbersdisconnected]

I saw nothing in the article that says it's OK to have g@y s3x with teenagers. 19 years old is considered an adult in every state in the nation.

If equity is your concern, I think it's "yuk" for an older guy to hit on a 20+ years younger female, too.

 

[Aaron]

I saw nothing in the article that says it's OK to have g@y s3x with teenagers. 19 years old is considered an adult in every state in the nation.

You missed the point.

Joshua Epstein, a blogger who identifies himself as a gay progressive Democrat, reacted to the Black-Daley affair on Twitter: "He could be his father. Yuk." That reaction was condemned by Huffington Post columnist Michelangelo Signorile, who said only "internalized homophobia" could cause gays to criticize such relationships.​

Pretend it was a 40-year-old-woman and a 19-year-old guy. "She could be his mother. Yuk." Is that internalized misogyny? No. Unless the woman really maintained herself, it's just gross.

Why, when it's a supposed natural alternative, is it homophobic to think it's gross?

 

[Bro. Curtis]

I'm with you on the "gross" factor. It's not homophobic.

 

[righteousdude2]

Your Opinion of the REV's OP Lacks Credence?!

As you so often like to say, Only an opinion piece and of no significance. Also, instead of citing the original article you cite an opinion piece from a biased web site.

No credibility. To use your words, Spectator "is a piece of trash".

I do not agree with the writer at the Huffpo. I think he is wrong!

Haven't you ever heard of NAMBLA? Their long-term mission is to make this an acceptable practice. I think you, and others need to get your heads out of the sand and look around at what the "third gender" has planned to spring upon mankind in their normalization of their sin! :tear:

To better edcuate yourself with this sick, sinful group of perverts, read the following link - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association

 

[thisnumbersdisconnected]

Haven't you ever heard of NAMBLA? Their long-term mission is to make this an acceptable practice. I think you, and others need to get your heads out of the sand and look around at what the "third gender" has planned to spring upon mankind in their normalization of their sin! :tear:

He knows. He's just doing his job, defending the moralless socialist agenda.

 

[Zaac]

Haven't you ever heard of NAMBLA? Their long-term mission is to make this an acceptable practice. I think you, and others need to get your heads out of the sand and look around at what the "third gender" has planned to spring upon mankind in their normalization of their sin! :tear:

To better edcuate yourself with this sick, sinful group of perverts, read the following link - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association

I wonder if there is a heterosexual version of this cause there sure does seem to be a movement of female teachers bedding young boys.

 

[righteousdude2]

Agreed...

I wonder if there is a heterosexual version of this cause there sure does seem to be a movement of female teachers bedding young boys.

In America's society men, women and inbetweeneres who prey on children, and no matter which group it is, it is still fornication, or in some cases adultery, or both! Sin is sin, regardless who it is committing it.

Years ago, when I was serving at a community drug and alcohol counseling center as the Administrator, I attended a symposium and a speaker boldly predicted, in 1985 mind you, that children would eventually become the preferred form of sexual interludes, because of the fear of HIV/Aids. And the question was asked, why, considering condoms are readily available? And the speaker stated, because those perverted enough to prey on children, prefer the sensation of not having to wear protective devices!

At the time, I thought he was a little perverted himself for making such predictions. However, over the last ten years, he seems more like a social prophet that knew what was coming our way! How sad indeed! :tear:

A word to parents, keep a short leash on your kids; know what is going on in their life, daily, and pray for them to be protected from the sickness that has gripped our society! :tear: