Hacked? Or a very clever, cost effective ad campaign?

Now that Sony Pictures has reversed its decision, AGAIN, on the movie "The Interview" does anyone else smell something fishy? If it is not a clever way to cheaply advertise this low budget, "B" movie (at the most) with minimal capital?

We may never know, but, it is awfully strange. What say you? :type:

 

And how do you know this to be a fact? Your point is as hypothetical as mine. And we both have a right to state what we think.


How many movies cost millions, and flop at the box office. Pre-screening on the film is not positive.

 

I was merely refuting your opinion. This is a debate board. Maybe you are taking it personal. I merely stated the early reviews did not look favorably on the film. I don't disagree. This cost Sony millions, but they won't be the first to take a bath.

However. I have to wonder if this was part of a clever way to garner free advertising. You have to admit, they have sold a ton of tickets out of patriotic support, and blind curiosity. A friend told me he wouldn't have even thought about seeing the film, but now wants to see what caused all the uproar. That got me thinking this may have been a n inexpensive for to advertise the movie.