I guess you've never been in ministry. Trust me, this is punishment.
Right you are, but sorry I can't see it as punishment. I'm getting quite an education today though from the clergy. I had no idea Christian ministers believed such things. I'm definitely in the wrong line of work. I didn't know working for a ministry could be such a gravy train. A six figure one year paid vacation and you call it "punishment." Who would have thought? In my line of work if I got suspended there'd be no pay. I wouldn't be able to just sit home for a year and take it easy. I'd have to find another source of income until I was reinstated. This is just another reason so many people have grown so cynical about the church and parachurch ministries. It's even worse than I thought -- a very protected and elite class, and double standards galore.
I do not know that punishment is the goal. Certainly discipleship and counseling. They guy has to support his family.
Except there's no mention anywhere, anyplace, that Sproul is receiving discipleship and counseling. Sproul doesn't say so. Ligonier doesn't say so (in fact they don't even mention anywhere that he was even suspended). His church doesn't say so. And btw he's still listed as a
pastor of his church. I wouldn't just
assume he's in counseling or being discipled. If it were happening wouldn't any of them want to say so, and especially Sproul himself? Instead he's concealing it with
they're handling it internally.
As for "The guy has to support his family," that's a classic example of a double standard. Earlier in the thread I saw some negative comments about another preacher's "moral failure" and comparing it to the RC Sproul Jr thing, "This [RC Sproul Jr suspension] is different than what Tullian Tchividhian did after his moral failure became public." The
Tullian Tchividjian Back in Active Ministry thread contains many comments that I agree with, including by you Ann and Revmitchel.. I won't be the one to claim the two situations are entirely equivalent, but others here have posted comments making the comparison, so let's go with that. Tchividhian wasn't suspended with pay. He resigned, which was the right thing for him to do. Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church brought charges against him and he was deposed from the ministry, again the right thing to do. Tullian was disciplined, and very seriously so, not just slapped on the wrist with a one year paid vacation.
A week later Tullian gets hired at Willowcreek as director of ministry development. Many complained over that, including Ann and Revmitchell. Ann said, "This man is right at this time absolutely disqualified from any service in the church at this time and any time in the near future." Pretty strong judgment Ann, and I agree with you. Revmitchell, you made some strong judgments too, even though Tullian is not pastoring or teaching or ministering. He's only in an admin role. So why doesn't "The guy has to support his family," apply to Tullian too Revmitchell?
As Reformed said in that thread, "What the shepherd does the sheep mimic." I couldn't agree more. We've got people in ministry here saying that Tullian wasn't dealt with harshly enough and Sproul's one year paid vacation is "punishment." As
the article I linked to makes more than obvious RC Sproul Jr's own moral failures are far worse than you seem to grasp. Perhaps you should at least read it before commenting further. If you fail to see how you're applying double standards then don't be surprised when members of your own churches follow your own example to justify their own bad ethics and moral failures.