The English burnt Joan, not the "Brits." Scotland was still a free and independent kingdom at the time.
The Brits burnt Joan of Arc so why are you lecturing us?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The Brits burnt Joan of Arc so why are you lecturing us?
The Brits burnt Joan of Arc so why are you lecturing us?
The English burnt Joan, not the "Brits." Scotland was still a free and independent kingdom at the time.
You do realize that when one volcano blows intense amounts of bad stuff is released into the air, right? It is our Creator who should be worshipped, not the created.
Look, they brainwash a little girl, who “progresses” to this state at which point they parade her onto the world stage as if she has a message. Their methods are detestable, but a great many others can’t see it because they are either taken in by the little girl or are already themselves brainwashed.While you are all attacking a little girl, try listening to a guy who's my age & has spent a lifetime singing out over a wide range of issues. Here's his contribution to the fracking debate. All the words are printed below the video.
It's Biblical to be "leftist-progressive." The resultant "political gain" is beneficial to the people in general, rather than those "rightist-capitalists" concerned only for their own profits.
Pretty blatant stereotyping there. In the US, "leftist-progressive" means, more than anything else, more government control of people's lives, and seems less about being "beneficial to the people in general" than about amassing centralized power. Unfortunately, many "rightist-capitalists" also look for government intervention, to protect their own financial interests. Neither objective fits my idea of biblical.
Capitalism has many shortcomings, but I look at it in the vein of a quote about democracy (by Churchill?), saying that democracy is a messy and unwieldy system of government. It's only grace is that it's not as bad as everything else that's been tried. (I wouldn't take capitalism that far - I'm not sufficiently knowledgeable about world economic systems to claim it's the best ever tried, but it beats a lot of systems which have been tried over the past 200 years.)
That's quite the deconstructive definition of capitalism. At its most basic, capitalism is the accumulation of funds (capital) in order to start a business, and the basic purpose of starting that business is to provide goods and/or services that people will want/need and be willing to purchase, thereby allowing the entrepreneur to support oneself and (if any) dependents. What you describe above is more akin to feudalism. It's also, unfortunately, how too many businesses are run nowadays. Most of today's "socialist" countries are really hybrids of socialism and capitalism, the Nordic counties being good examples. Purely socialist economies are thankfully rare.Capitalism means that the rich control the economy for their own benefit. As they own the land & properties, they employ the poor to work for them. The poor have no choice but to comply. Also the poor have no redress to law, as the lawyers are rich & need to be paid. The health of the poor suffers as health care has to be paid for.
The landowners of the great estates - inherited down the generations - controlled the land for their benefit, including reserving common areas for hunting, so that if a poor man caught a rabbit for his family he was stealing. Vast numbers of desperate poor had no livelihood & were transported as criminals to Australia & other countries.
They hang the man & flog the woman
who steal a goose from off the common,
but leave the greater villain loose
who steals the common from the goose.
Socialism is a state organised collective system whereby people pay taxes that are used to provide services for those in need. The rich are not impoverished - they pay out of their wealth. A healthy, contented work force benefits the rich. Some factory owners in Britain built housing for their employees.
Americans need to visit the UK so that they can see with their own eyes exactly what a step down looks like up close. Americans keep forgetting that one needs a police state to obtain the lower standard of living that the UK enjoys. Of course, if you want to trade freedom for a lower standard of living, then the UK is a step ahead of us because they don't have a Bill of Rights. But then France and Germany don't have a Bill of Rights either so that proves that you don't miss what you never had ever. If you like Europe's step down life, then you might try falling off the cliff by visiting a Muslim nation.
Having seen both socialism and capitalism, I will choose capitalism every time.
UK police don't need to carry guns. We have a friendly relationship with our police. Have you lived in the UK - I have & am.
While I choose Socialism. Growing up after WW2 we enjoyed the opportunities our parents didn't have under the old capitalism where money gave power & medical care, education & favourable openings into employment.
Our post war socialism gave us the National Health Service, free higher education, university grants, council housing (beginning with an emergency prefab housing scheme,) pensions, all paid for out of taxes paid by those earning adequately.
Nationalised industries meant our essential services were run for the benefit of the community, rather than for a commercial profit.
The capitalism since 1980 has sold off our resources, including industries & transport, so they are run at a profit without caring for the consumer. Health care specialities have been privatised, so that the expertise has to be bought in, rather than staying with hospital staff. Rented housing for young couples is not affordable at a price within basic wages.
While you are all attacking a little girl, try listening to a guy who's my age & has spent a lifetime singing out over a wide range of issues.
Here's his contribution to the fracking debate.
All the words are printed below the video.
We haven't got a "huge criminal element" like you, so our police don't need to be armed.We like our cops, too, but we have a huge criminal element that likes to murder cops so we arm them and we arm ourselves so that we don't end up with a police state like you have.
All that was under capitalism - state control of the British Empire.We remember when you tried to disarm us and leave us at the mercy of the French and the savages. We beat you during the Revolution of 1776 and we beat you in the Battle of New Orleans when you kept charging our lines and we shot you down.
We used the capital for the benefit of the people. Who or what else should we spend it on?We know what you did after WW II. You consumed all the capital that you could find on yourselves and ran you industries with government control.
Welfare payments keep the money in the economy - people spend it on rent & food & clothing, etc. Tax concessions to the rich people & corporations take money from the economy.That is the reason that you are a step down from the USA because you have too much welfare. Your medical system is second-rate and your doctors are paupers, government employees for life with low salaries. People say that London has an inadequate sewer system. You have a high murder rate in London and I guess your unarmed police are just statisticians. Your prisons are apparently very poor by modern standards. I have no idea what your per capita income is but I imagine that you are not too high in comparison to Germany, Switzerland, and Scandinavia. Your military must be demoralized. You are putting people in prison for silly remarks on Facebook so you know that you have a police state. I doubt if you can say about your government what I say about it and avoid prison.
We haven't got a "huge criminal element" like you, so our police don't need to be armed.
All that was under capitalism - state control of the British Empire.
We used the capital for the benefit of the people. Who or what else should we spend it on?
Welfare payments keep the money in the economy - people spend it on rent & food & clothing, etc. Tax concessions to the rich people & corporations take money from the economy.
London's sewage system copes with an ever-increasing number of people, & the Thames estuary is clean enough for fish & cetaceans.
The murder rate in London is being studied. It seems particularly that the recent capitalist austerity programme has meant resources for the young have been greatly reduced. School exclusions & lack of youth facilities, together with lack of job opportunities & expensive flats have all contributed. The increased services provided by socialism would offset this.
It's not just the UK attacking contributors to facebook. The whole "PC" mindset is seriously & increasingly antichristian.
The UK is putting dissidents in prison because they know that all you have in the way of weapons are kitchen knives. Germany taught the UK that disarming the public was the first step towards crowd control. Oh, yeah, more welfare is the solution to solving the crime problem in London, a city also short on sewers and so it uses the Thames River as a sewer. British police couldn't break up the London gangs even if they wanted to. If welfare is so good for the Brit economy, how come it is a second-class economy? You lost your entire auto industry to lack of innovation. Maybe you should raise taxes so that you can handle out more welfare through your low paid state employees. Actually, you could all stop working and all draw welfare and that would really put a lot of money in circulation just like in Cuba. Why don't you tell the "Windsors" to hand over their money to your welfare system? Our fast food employees probably make more money than your doctors and nurses. What is your unemployment rate during this recession that you are in? I can't wait to hear about your total conversion to solar panels and windmills for energy. That will cost you your last pound and you won't have enough power to keep your running water going. You will be using outdoor latrines and wearing blankets inside and using trash fires to cook your food.
You write offensive, ignorant rubbish.
We have solar panels on our roof - we use the energy & return the excess to the national grid. The electricity company pays us over £1700 for the electricity we supply, while charging about £600 for what we use for cooking & water heating, washing, etc. We have oil fired central heating which costs about £600 a year to run, so our roof panels pay us.