The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy

[Revmitchell]

Poznan University of the Medical Sciences, Pediatric Hospital, 60-572 Poznan, Poland
2
Department of Psychology, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58448 Witten, Germany
3
Change Health Science Institute, 10178 Berlin, Germany
4
Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, 97422 Schweinfurt, Germany
5
Independent Data and Pattern Scientist, Brinkenbergweg 1, 7351 BD Hoenderloo, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Ralph J. DiClemente
Vaccines 2021, 9(7), 693; The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy
Received: 2 June 2021 / Revised: 19 June 2021 / Accepted: 21 June 2021 / Published: 24 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Download PDF
Browse Figure

Figure 1
Individual safety case reports in association with COVID 19 vaccines in Europe.

" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(49, 86, 162); line-height: inherit; max-height: 1000000px; font-weight: 700;">Review Reports SARS-CoV2; COVID-19; vaccination; mRNA-vaccine; number needed to vaccinate; safety; side effects; adverse drug reaction; fatal side effects; EMA


The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy

 

[JonC]

A retracted journal article?

 

[percho]

A retracted journal article?

Hydroxychloroquine Study Retracted Explained by Doctor - YouTube

 

[Revmitchell]

Hydroxychloroquine Study Retracted Explained by Doctor - YouTube

And it’s junk like this that makes me not trust all of this. Most likely the retraction is a result of outside pressure. The “science” in favor of the jab cannot be trusted.

 

[JonC]

And it’s junk like this that makes me not trust all of this. Most likely the retraction is a result of outside pressure. The “science” in favor of the jab cannot be trusted.

But it is the same science that saved millions of lives.

Why do you trust the experts you cite?

Did you trust them before they said what you wanted to hear?

Or do you trust them because they say what you want to hear?

 

[Revmitchell]

But it is the same science that saved millions of lives.

Why do you trust the experts you cite?

Did you trust them before they said what you wanted to hear?

Or do you trust them because they say what you want to hear?

you are projecting as usual

 

[Reformed1689]

But it is the same science that saved millions of lives.

So they say. You don't know what the effects would have been on those millions without the vaccine since the virus has a high survivability rate.

 

[JonC]

you are projecting as usual

No, I am not projecting.

The reason I believe the scientists associated with the CDC, FDA, and AMA is these are the organizations that have provided vaccines that has saved millions of lives. Their work and recommendations have saved the lives of cancer patients and their preventative measures have caught cancer early enough in people that many cancers that would previously be a death sentence are no longer.

Why do you trust the experts you reference?

 

[KenH]

Did you trust them before they said what you wanted to hear?

Or do you trust them because they say what you want to hear?

Winner by knockout!

 

[Revmitchell]

No, I am not projecting.

The reason I believe the scientists associated with the CDC, FDA, and AMA is these are the organizations that have provided vaccines that has saved millions of lives. Their work and recommendations have saved the lives of cancer patients and their preventative measures have caught cancer early enough in people that many cancers that would previously be a death sentence are no longer.

Why do you trust the experts you reference?

See this is what you don’t get do to your assumptions. I don’t know who to trust. Not sure what to believe. I do know what I don’t trust. People with nasty attitudes like yours. For instance calling me evil because I had a different view than you. Reported it multiple times. You have no interest considering opposition to the current narrative from the far left about covid or the jab. Your intention is to always bat it down. Not credible. Those are things I don’t trust.

 

[JonC]

See this is what you don’t get do to your assumptions. I don’t know who to trust. Not sure what to believe. I do know what I don’t trust. People with nasty attitudes like yours. For instance calling me evil because I had a different view than you. Reported it multiple times. You have no interest considering opposition to the current narrative from the far left about covid or the jab. Your intention is to always bat it down. Not credible. Those are things I don’t trust.

I don't trust people with nasty attitudes like you. But guess what? I'm not asking you to trust me. So we're good, brother.

And I have not called you evil. That is you deflecting from the question.

I told you what sources I trust and the reasons I trust those sources.

I am asking YOU how YOU determine a source is trustworthy. Of all the people and organizations you have used as sources about the virus and vacvines, how many did you trust 4 years ago and how many did you just find while hunting g people who agreed with what you had already decided?

 

[percho]

But it is the same science that saved millions of lives.

Why do you trust the experts you cite?

Did you trust them before they said what you wanted to hear?

Or do you trust them because they say what you want to hear?

Do you agree that selective retraction has taken place relative to the political environment rather than because of the data as the lady states in the vid?

 

[JonC]

Do you agree that selective retraction has taken place relative to the political environment rather than because of the data as the lady states in the vid?

It depends on who or what one relies upon.

When we examine the info on the CDC site they provide the evidence and justifications for conclusions but also the ammo anti-covid-vaxers use against them.

This is one reason I trust them as a source. Where they list negative potential effects of vaccines, acknowledge challenges, recognize weaknesses, etc. the anti-covid-vax sources deny any of the potential for vaccines.

But if you mean relying on politics and political organizations then I would agree.