• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The bottom line is that 9/11 was a demonstration of an invention that is astonishingly different tha

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I guess my title was too long. It should read:
"The bottom line is that 9/11 was a demonstration of an invention that is astonishingly different than mere thermite."

Here is the surprising truth about the 9/11 "Truth" Movement. Judy wood, having a much more accurate and more complete accounting of what happened 20 years ago, is being censored by Wiki and other media shills - AND the supposedly objective 9/11 "Truth" Movement.
If you are more interested in the actual findings of Dr. Wood than the censorship of them just scroll down 3/4ths of the way down.
The bottom line is that 9/11 was a demonstration of an invention that is astonishingly different than mere thermite.

----
aaajw.png

Dr. Judy Wood
sonSrtodpec 0 g9550h51am5hhm,3lml2mr0t1gc53a5g50ltl51lM9l2a3 ·
'Real whistleblowers don't show up on your evening news.'
One of the primary reasons the large body of evidence from 9/11 has not gotten the attention it https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=108890969175538&set=a.108769095854392.12444.108768449187790&type=1&permPage=1
Photo #1 is a screen shot showing the Wikipedia page I had created about Dr. Judy Wood, shortly after it was deleted (it was deleted within 12 hours of being created).
Why was I quickly censored when I tried to create a Dr. Judy Wood Wikipedia page using her long list of 20+ peer-reviewed engineering publications? Why was I quickly censored when I tried to add Dr. Judy Wood’s name and website to the ‘9/11 Truth Movement’ Wikipedia page? Why are Dr. David Ray Griffin (Philosophy of Religion and Theology professor) and many other less-qualified "researchers" mentioned multiple times on the ‘9/11 Truth Movement’ Wikipedia page, yet I wasn't even allowed to add one sentence about Dr. Judy Wood (Materials Science Engineer) or the large body of evidence from 9/11 she has assembled? Below is an insightful comment that one of the opposing moderators made to me in a private chat after my Dr. Judy Wood article was deleted:
“I would give Judy Woods [sic] a rest, seriously. Your own credibility over the topic has put her and you on the radar of a number of people and even if you came up with really good references from the NYTimes or Bloomberg you wouldn't be able to create the article anyways - the name is has [sic] been blocked for a while. If you really want to pursue it then I'd suggest creating a private page of your own to develop it. Nobody would fiddle with it and you can craft it until its acceptable. I could help you there. But the comments of the others are still very valid.--Hooperbloob (talk) 03:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC)”
When I tried to appeal the decision, a small group of Wikipedia moderators controlled the discussion and told me that if I appealed it again my account would be locked. According to Wikipedia policy, deletion-appeal discussions were to remain open for public comment and review for 5-7 days before a final decision is made, but my appeal was given a final decision by a small group of rude Wikipedia moderators within 12 hours of the onset of my appeal, and the discussion was prematurely closed. After some reading, I realized this was a violation of Wikipedia's own policy, so I appealed the decision again, and my account was locked as a result.
You can read all the details and see actual screen shots of my Wikipedia incident here: http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php...
2. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=451248698273095...
Photo #2 discusses my censorship by 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth' (AE911Truth), a prominent 9/11 "Truth" organization. In Spring of 2010 during my first year of medical school, I messaged Richard Gage of AE911Truth to ask him if he knew about the large sum of important physical evidence that Dr. Judy Wood has discovered, and as a result, I was silently banned from AE911Truth, despite the fact that I have donated over $100 dollars to Richard Gage and his organization over the course of my ~1 year membership. As of the morning of March 4th 2010, my name was removed from the AE911Truth petition and my profile was deleted, so it appears that my account has been fully banned from the group simply for sharing evidence with Richard Gage in one private email. It is important to point out that I did not post any information about Dr. Judy Wood in my AE911Truth profile. I had only recently discovered Dr. Judy Wood, and soon after that I decided to send Mr. Gage the single email to ask him for his opinion about the evidence Dr. Wood has discovered. The spontaneous banning of a well-behaved AE911Truth supporter and donor is very concerning to me, because I have not done anything wrong by asking Richard Gage if he is aware of the large sum of empirical evidence Dr. Judy Wood has gathered, yet AE911Truth has banned me simply for trying to help without ever replying to my email. Furthermore, soon after I began posting on internet blogs and forums about what AE911Truth had done to me, it was then that I finally received a reply, from AE911Truth 'Volunteer Coordinator' Mark Graham, offering me a refund of my past donations because an AE911Truth member had noticed I was publicly sharing my story.
 
Last edited:

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If Mr. Gage was searching for the truth, then he would not be trying to deceive his supporters and the American people by claiming to present the best "scientific forensic evidence", only to completely ignore the large sum of scientific forensic evidence that thermite does not explain. If a scientist or researcher only presented the evidence that supports their hypothesis while completely ignoring the evidence that countered their hypothesis, they could be stripped of their professional license or degree for presenting such an unscientific and biased fraction of the total sum of important physical evidence that demands consideration. Just over a year later, I had the chance to confront Mr. Gage at an AE911Truth presentation in Peoria, IL where I was attending medical school. If you click the AE911Truth image above, you will see the links to the two-part video recording of our encounter, during which I recorded Mr. Gage admitting to me that thermite does not explain the empirical evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important NYC seismographic data. In addition, I recorded him lying to the public and making excuses for why he chooses to ignore the large sum of empirical evidence from 9/11 that thermite does not explain.
You can read more about my story and see the actual email from AE911Truth's Mark Graham at this link: http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php...
3. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=108890895842212&set=a.108769095854392.12444.108768449187790&type=1&permPage=1
Photo #3 shows a small, partial list of the 9/11 "Truth" forums that have banned me or removed posts of mine just for posting or discussing the large body of evidence Dr. Judy Wood has gathered. It seems these groups are more interested in pushing the unscientific "explosives did it" story rather than discussing the empirical evidence from 9/11. Explosives of any kind do not come close to explaining the empirical evidence from 9/11, so why are they pushing unscientific theories while censoring all of the evidence that must be explained? These forums appear to be corrupt, as any real "truth" group would be interested in discussing the evidence, rather than censoring it.
Photo courtesy of Adam Dwyer
Source: http://debamboozled.files.wordpress.com/.../2014-05-30...
---------------------------------------------------------

Humankind has made a major scientific discovery by learning to manipulate matter using directed energy in a new and extremely powerful way. This is one of the most important scientific discoveries since the nuclear fission technology that was used to create the atomic bomb. It is an irrefutable fact that directed energy technology was used to transform the WTC buildings to fine dust in midair on 9/11/2001. This inescapable conclusion is revealed by the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, and is overwhelmingly proven beyond any reasonable doubt. I have already contacted numerous law enforcement agencies and government officials about this matter, including the FBI, branches of the military, my local sheriffs department, and several congressional representatives.
Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D | 9/11 Breakthrough Energy Technology http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaWyiozg...
I hope you are brave enough to consider my words with an open mind, and to not look negatively upon me for my attempts to make our world a better place. The powerful knowledge that is conclusively revealed by the large body of evidence from 9/11 can help to rapidly bring more truth, justice, and liberty to our great nation and awesome planet, so please take the time to learn about and understand this extremely important topic. I must stress to you that despite the negative connotations associated with the tragedy of the 9/11 attacks, you may someday agree with me that 9/11 is one of the primary reasons that immensely positive changes and increasing levels of citizen activism are sweeping across our planet at a more rapid pace than ever before. To better understand my intention in sharing this information, please consider the following words from Martin Luther King Jr. "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." -Martin Luther King Jr. (I Have a Dream: Writings and Speeches That Changed the World)
This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood's presentation at the 2012 'Breakthrough Energy Movement' conference in Holland).
http://www.facebook.com/drjudywood/photos/a.108769095854392.12444.108768449187790/516718861726078
Source: http://drjudywood.com/ & http://vimeo.com/57923364
 

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
9/11 is irrefutable proof that highly advanced forms of energy technology, such as those discovered and inspired by the great Nikola Tesla, do indeed exist and could be providing our entire planet with a breakthrough form of energy technology, right now. 9/11 is irrefutable proof that countless lives and resources have been wasted on wars of death and destruction, all as a result of an extremely inaccurate, unscientific story, when these precious lives and resources could instead be used to improve our awesome country and planet. Most importantly, 9/11 is irrefutable proof that each and every one of us is capable of seeing straight through the deception and dishonesty by thinking critically and studying the available facts for ourselves, which is a self-empowering and life-transforming fact. The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11, gathered and assembled by materials science engineer Dr. Judy Wood PhD, is conclusive and irrefutable, so one only needs to study it in detail to prove this beyond any reasonable doubt, no theories or speculation are necessary.
IRREFUTABLE 'Introduction to the Evidence' 9/11 Video Series: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2mg5ndzVgg...
 

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Please study the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, including the Columbia University NYC seismographic data, University of Alaska magnetometer data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, NASA AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, 7 total WTC buildings destroyed on 9/11, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 'lathering up', WTC7 'lathering up', WTC2 falling dust trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 'free fall' destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of WTC metals, rapid spontaneous rusting of Bankers Trust metals, 1400+ 'toasted' and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous 'weird' fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC 'Bathtub' foundation, presence of dust 'fuzzballs', strange round window holes, shriveled WTC steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis 'rolling up' of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, Bankers Trust warped and shriveled metal beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between 'The Hutchison Effect' and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.
9/11 & Directed Energy Technology [Evidence-Packed Slideshow | 500 Slides]: http://www.slideshare.net/jps2041/dr-judy-wood-911
Thanks to communication technology and passionate activism that are currently spreading throughout our world, this is the best chance we have ever had in all of history to escape this dishonesty and corruption, so we may create a magnificent future guided by truth, justice, freedom, peace, and love, for our children and all future generations. With all of my heart, I request that you please study the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 in great detail, for our entire planet and everything on it will benefit if you do.
http://WhereDidTheTowersGo.com
http://DrJudyWood.com
http://CheckTheEvidence.com
http://Facebook.com/DrJudyWood
http://pookzta.blogspot.com
http://Irrefutable.tv
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I prefer the theory that the Unions and the Mafia cut corners on fire insulation on the steel structure of the towers when they were built.
Design specs for towers solve the mystery. The burn times for the structure did not account for physical damage nor did they account for jet fuel.
 

Alan Gross

Well-Known Member
Judy Wood is as close as you can get to a brilliant Patriot.

Here is a 1hr 30 version of "The Truth", as we know it.


"DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO RIGHT AWAY, AND REPUBLISH IT ON A DIFFERENT PLATFORM.

IT HAS BEEN REPUBLISHED ON SEPT. 11, 2021
AND WILL NOT LAST LONG BEFORE IT GETS NUKED BY YOUTUBE, AS THE TOWERS WERE.

THE 3 HOURS VERSION WAS JUST BANNED IN NOVEMBER 2021.

" Alexander "Ace" Baker's 9-11 Psy Opera condensed to 1 hour 30.

"The most important, with some digressions.

" Watch the original here: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=..."
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I prefer the theory that the Unions and the Mafia cut corners on fire insulation on the steel structure of the towers when they were built.
That’s quite possible. The fire insulation failed on key support beams, leading to collapse of the trusses when the fire weakened the steel.

Design specs for towers solve the mystery. The burn times for the structure did not account for physical damage nor did they account for jet fuel.
Exactly.
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Of course there were jets.

The jets were seen by thousands of eyewitnesses.

Tens of millions saw the second crash on live television (including me).

Extensive debris, personal effects, and bodies of the passengers that matched the jets and passengers were found at all four crash sites.

To suggest “there were no jets” is self-deluded lunacy.
 

Alan Gross

Well-Known Member
Of course there were jets.

The jets were seen by thousands of eyewitnesses.

Tens of millions saw the second crash on live television (including me).

Extensive debris, personal effects, and bodies of the passengers that matched the jets and passengers were found at all four crash sites.

To suggest “there were no jets” is self-deluded lunacy.

Extensive debris, personal effects, and bodies of the passengers that matched the jets and passengers were found at all four crash sites.

I do not know of any evidence for any of these things and I don't believe any exists,
nor any evidence of any planes, other than cartoon ones.

this begins at around 39:00
and follows through to show the common usage of cartoon tricks
to make 'planes' appear to have been used.
 
Last edited:

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I do not know of any evidence for any of these things…
There is plenty of photographic evidence out there for anyone who even makes a casual effort to find it.

There has been extensive evidence for jet parts matching each of the four planes at each site, personal effects, and bodies/body parts strewn throughout rooftops and the debris field in New York City, within the wreckage of the Pentagon, and in a hole in a field in Pennsylvania.

There is photographic evidence of these things, as well as the testimonies of thousands of people who had the gruesome task of sorting through all of the debris and separating out body parts, jet parts, and personal effects.

Unless you believe that the passengers of all of the planes boarded the aircraft in the view of loved ones, taxied away, secretly landed somewhere where a nefarious party shredded all four jets with the persons inside them, then partially torched the remains (carefully separating the shredding process for the Pennsylvania crash site and the Pentagon crash site) to prepare the fake evidence. Then they would have to somehow gather all of that material deposit it in a hole in a remote field Pennsylvania within about two hours from the beginning of the fraud, place the debris inside the Pentagon and both towers of the World Trade Center, as well as somehow secretly spread bodies, body parts, and aircraft debris throughout southern Manhattan on a busy Tuesday morning without anyone noticing.

Then they would have to somehow distribute fake video to numerous people throughout the region, from professional news personnel, to amateur photographers, while everyone joined in on the conspiracy.

The possibility of faking that evidence is astronomically small.

…and I don't believe any exists…
We have identified the problem. You have made a decision not to believe evidence and to discount anything to the contrary.

nor any evidence of any planes…
Take a look.
 
Top