I never said Paul considered or conditioned repenting and believing as works done for Salvation, but people who do condition their acts of repentance and believing as conditions for Salvation, they advocate the accursed gospel of works.
Those that advocate the necessity of belief and repentance prior to salvation reject the accusation they advocate a works based salvation. Since they clearly deny its works based, why make that accusation?
IMO, this whole debate is needless.
“Salvation”, imo, simply means a person has been brought into a right relationship with God and is, therefore no longer stands condemned.
I believe scripture teaches that right relationship occurs when God Holy Spirit regenerates a person (no salvation yet), convicts them of sin (no salvation yet), convicts the person of the truth of Jesus Christ and Him crucified (no salvation yet), that person responds with repentance and faith in Jesus Christ and Him crucified (now that person is indwelt by God Holy Spirit and brought into a right relationship with God)
That is a “logical” sequence that may actually occur instantaneously when God Holy Spirit regenerates a person.
peace to you