You really believe that NONE here on BB hold that man has the inherit faith/free will still in us to make that decision for Christ APART from god doing anything other than giving the Gospel to us?
I hope I haven't caused too many problems here.
My point is simply that both Calvinists & Non-Cals are open to questions about why God doesn't save everyone:
One could ask a Cal why God did not elect and regenerate everyone, and show his great mercy on sinners who would not have otherwise accepted him.
One could ask a non-call why God places free-will at a higher value than the salvation of a sinner who is using their free-will to reject him.
I'm assuming that you mean someone like myself, who probably tends to be more arminian with some calvinistic leanings, but claiming to be neither arminian nor calvinist (thus, "non-cal").
To which I would respond: As InTheLight pointed out, you've created an untrue caricature, because I doubt you can point to a single quote or even concept that supports your claim that I, or others like me, "deny that God has to provide any 'additional' grace." Instead, just like both Arminius and Calvin, I'd agree that God's grace is sufficient.
Now there's an interesting comment. If I understood your comment correctly, you seem to think there will be large numbers saved, in order to bring more glory to God; yet scripture tells us the gate that leads to life is narrow, and few will find it."
Would you please clarify further?
(BTW: just like I mentioned that the calvinist must explain why "whosoever" doesn't mean "whosoever," the calvinist must also explain why God Himself says in this verse that few will find it, rather than few will be brought to it. Every jot and every tittle, you know....)
Don't sweat it. These calvinists vice non-cal discussions seem to usually degenerate into personal grudge matches. :tongue3:
But I would say that your second question is slightly off. I think what you're getting at is that the salvation of the sinner should be a higher priority; but that leads directly back to your question to calvinists. If salvation is a higher priority than free will, then why did God not elect and regenerate everyone?
And thus, your questions seem to become circular in nature....
Does God exault the free will of man to a level high enough that man is really possessing a free will sufficient to freely decide for Jesus, that man has a will equivalent to God in the matter of the salvation process?
Not better phrasing at all; because the end result of your re-wording ("does God exalt the free will of man to a level...equivalent to God") means "does God place man at the same level as Himself?"
If yes, then scripture is violated. If no, then we circle back to the first question: why didn't God elect and regenerate everyone?
(and I reiterate the questions that are related, but you're choosing not address here: why does "whosoever" not mean "whosoever"; and why does God say "find" if He really means "I'll bring you.")
Tom, every arminian and non-cal on this board also agrees with that. But looking through this thread, you've got some cals who state that it's not "anybody who wants to," but only those that God elects/chooses. Refer to post #3 of this thread as the proof.
or this.........
15that every one who is believing in him may not perish, but may have life age-during,
16for God did so love the world, that His Son -- the only begotten -- He gave, that every one who is believing in him may not perish, but may have life age-during.
DON....
Sure...because the bible teaches that.....jn6:44....romans3;10-12