I think, given their propensity to not engage any enemy in war,
it seems an extremely appropriate and telling article, against the election of a Democrat president.
Why yes, which is exactly the same 9 reasons we should not elect a Republican, because they are both equally rotten to the core, as neither care about the American people.
But have no fear, in 2008, Oregon's electoral votes are awarded to, you guessed it, Hillary!!!!
What war on terror?
It doesn't seem the current Republican occupant of the White House is fighting much of a war on terror, whose to say that the Democrats couldn't do better?
At least, they might actually get the military in the right geographic area to fight Al Qaeda.
Then, too, the credibility of this particular source leaves an awful lot to be desired.