I don't see how one escapes the impression that Calvinism = determinism. I've seen on this board that a Calvinist who is not a determinist seems oxymoronic. The two go hand in hand. That's why I value brother Iconoclast, for at least he is consistent.
I agree with that.
Maybe my question was not asked that well.
Compatibilism is consistent with determinism and teaches man will choose that which is his greatest desire.
Do you disagree that man will choose that which is his greatest desire? And of course when I say that I say his greatest desire at the moment of the choice with the options that are available to him at the time of the choice.
An old preacher that I knew when I was a teenager was asked how he resolved the conflict between God's sovereignty and man's will.l
He responded, "I never knew they had a falling out!"
Obviously it's not quite that simple, at least to me.
I agree with the old preacher, but I confess that some of this is beyond my ability to understand.
Maybe this verse will help:
Acts 2:23
This is an interesting verse to me.
Peter is saying that
Jesus was delivered up and crucified as the result of the determinate counsel of God.
He also is saying that it was by God's foreknowledge.
It would be easy to conclude that God simply knew how things were going to turn out because of his foreknowledge.l
It's that "determinate counsel" that makes the statement so strong.
One could conclude then, that God knew it was going to happen because he determined that it would happen.
Does that include every detail of every event surrounding the crucifixion?
Here's another interesting thing.
He said the perpetrators had "wicked hands."
They were wicked people and were directly responsible for killing the Lord Jesus.
So, what we have here is God's determinate counsel that Jesus would die, and the wicked hands would be held responsible for it.
Here I must stop because I have reached the limits of my understanding.
It's, as somebody famous once said, "above my pay grade."
I now yield to anyone else who'd like to take a crack at this.
I believe we make choices based on what we perceive to be the best choice, not the greatest desire.
Case in point, God has set eternity in the hearts of all men as well as His law.
Surely a desire placed in our hearts trumps any desire we can muster on our own...yet most men do not choose to follow either.
And when you want to make the best choice, that's your desire. You have a desire to make the best choice. It's still based on your desire.
Men choose to go to hell because they do not desire God. They desire to do things their own way.
I'll make this hypothesis. Every single decision that you have ever made is based on your greatest desire at the moment of the decision. I have yet to be able to prove this wrong.
Example:
You are in an alley and a guy comes to you with a gun and demands you give him your wallet. Now, do you really want to give him your wallet that has your hard earned money in it? No, of course
not. But in that moment, you want(desire) to give him your money more than any other option that's available to you. Your true choice is really life or death. Your desire for life is greater than your desire to keep the money because you know keeping the money will result in death.
You have a choice to eat a salad or chocolate cake. You really want a slice of chocolate cake, but choose the salad instead because you don't want that much sugar. So your desire for health is greater than your desire to satisfy your sweet tooth. And yes, your desire for a good choice is greater than your desire for the cake.
Every single choice we make is based on our desires.
I disagree.
I believe desire does and can affect the decision, but many other factors are also in play.
But if God placed the desire in the man's heart to desire Him, how do you reconcile that?
This is a good example that supports circumstances also play into how a decision is made.
The greatest desire in your example is to not even be in that position, yet we cannot choose it.
The greatest desire is to leave their with your life and your wallet, but that is not going to happen either.
The only choice we apparently have is a "bondage to our will". Now, how is that really a choice? If my hands are tied behind my back, tossed into the ocean, and told I can swim to shore and live, what choice do I really have? This is the only choice Calvinists give us.
Correct. It's like buying a Model T 100 years ago. As Henry Ford said, “Any customer can have a car painted any color that he wants so long as it is black”. So you have a choice, but only the one that is presented to you, no other. So it is with Calvinism.
I never said there were no other factors, but desire is at the core.
What needs to be reconciled?
Yes. That's my point. You always choose what you desire the most with the options available to you. The circumstances play a major part. Desire is still at the core of you making the final choice. Circumstances will limit the available options of which you to choose from.
I try to be careful how I word things. God ordained that all event would take place, but that doesn't mean God was causing the event to take place. The child molestation was done because an evil man committed an evil act because he was evil and wanted to commit that evil act.
That's the Bible. Man is evil. The Bible teaches that over and over and over again. We are slaves to sin. We are in bondage to sin. This doesn't mean that man is as evil as he can be, but that he will never choose to come to Christ.
Maybe that is why the godly men who wrote the confession offered 15 verses of scripture to support this staement...did you look at the verses,willis:thumbs::thumbs: