Constitutional scholar that you are - certainly you must be familiar with the term "right to bear arms".
A question for conservatives
Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by KenH, Nov 18, 2010.
Page 3 of 5
-
Crabtownboy Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
Now wipe off that drool and go back up into the attic. :smilewinkgrin: -
Crabtownboy Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Do you believe the Constitution is a living document? -
-
Were the founding fathers aware of the possibility of the telephone?
It appears then by objecting to warrantless wiretaps that you think that the Constitution is a living document.
Go back and read the last four or five posts to this thread to see if you can follow the discussion.
We can take it up again from there. -
Crabtownboy Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
I'll think of you are I save carbon this weekend as I walk around Prague. Park you car and save carbon also.
Getting late, I'm out of here for the weekend. -
:laugh:
The founding fathers were no aware of either.
Having a dicussion with you is like riding a merry-go-round.
It goes around and around but gets nowhere. :laugh:
You understand nothing about what is being discussed !!! :laugh: -
Thinkingstuff Active Member
-
You could regulate an A bomb from a public safety standpoint. Because of the radiation risk I think it would be completely constitutional for the federal government to say you can only have an A bomb at your house is you can demonstrate that you can store and house it safely in a way that poses no threat to anyone outside of your home.
Remember, the 2nd amendment was not put into the constitution for hunters or sportsman. It was put in there so that the people of our nation could in the future, if necessary, overthrow the government and install a new one, something our founders accomplished for themselves. Any weapon that would aide in the overthrow of our government should be legal. -
-
You are so special. :love2: -
-
-
So you guys do think it should be legal for your next-door neighber to keep an atomic bomb in his basement
-
It is not a violation of the constitution. You can use weapons to defend yourself against an attacker but that does not give you the right to use said weapon against an innocent person. One cannot use a nuclear weapon without harming innocent people and property belonging to someone other than an attacker.
-
SBCPreacher Active MemberSite Supporter
Just a suggestion...
Can you two (Targus and Crabby) start your own thread where you can hurl insults at each other and question each others intentions. It's getting tiresome to wade through it to get to the OP and the replies.
Either that or please try to stick to the OP. -
Yes or No: Are nuclear weapons arms?
Yes or No: Does the constitution affirm the right to keep and bear arms? -
I do not consider nuclear weapons to fall under the purview of the second amendment. If you think they do, that is a defensible position to take. I understand where you are coming from on that. -
NS is special because NS focuses in on the real issues while everybody else around seems lost in the sauce. To those folks who are lost in the sauce (false left vs right paradigm) NS only appears to have an enlightened understanding. :smilewinkgrin:
Here, have at it enlighten yourself.
The American culture of today is being assaulted along the same lines that Caesar and Hitler used long ago, and Americans are falling prey to such tactics in growing numbers with every passing hour. We are truly a divided people, who agree or disagree along party, ethnic, racial and religious lines. Much like the priests of centuries past, no decision can be made without first consulting our appointed political or social �leaders�. We take sides with differing factions within our country, arguing about single issues that are presented to us and whose sole purpose is to divide us into isolated groups. Instead of meaningful debate about the future of our nation, we receive only distractions. We thirst for truth, meaning, and freedom, but instead find ourselves wandering through the desert of distraction and confusion. We seek leaders, but only receive figureheads. We have ceased being Americans. We are conservatives or liberals. We are environmentalists or corporate interests, Catholics or Protestants, hawks or doves, black or white. The people of America are divided among many lines, ultimately under the confines of a system of right and left. Much like the German people of the 1930s, we are isolated from clear perspective. Much like the beleaguered Celts, we are so distracted by civil war of right and left, we aren�t aware of our country vanishing before our eyes. The truth is, there is no right or left. There is only right and wrong.
Full Article
Now you posess an enlightened understanding of the world.
Use it wisely citizen.
Page 3 of 5