Why is it that the same right-wingers who say that Bush isn't running when confronted with another Bush blunder are constantly bringing up Clinton.
I think they cannot get over that this Democratic President was a huge success.
Knowing this and that Bush is such a failure, they just can't stand it. :laugh:
Hey Bro, we're trying to build a New World Order. Can't do that without breaking a few eggs...or killing a few hundred thousand women and children.
The end always justifies the means...don't ya know?
Fact of the matter is Clinton and Bush play for the same team and I ain't talking about team America. They're not even Americans they're globalists. If either one them were really true blue American they would live up to their oath of office and defend the constitution instead of undermining it every chance they get in favor of the "international community".
Or should we start calling it the "transnational community" now?
Check out this article. America has spent 48 billion toward the reconstruction of Iraq while they have racked up $80 billion in oil-fueled surplus. That's what Bush has done that's so bad...
To quote Mike Tyson, "that's ludacrisp (ludicrous)"...
NAFTA is responsible for the jobs leaving this country, and your man Clinton is the one that put that in...which BTW I see now that Hillary opposes it, (another flip-flop)
I think total privitazation of SS is a terrible idea and I oppose Bush's views on this, but he didnt get it done, so how did that affect the economy?
And the war in Iraq is the same old argument.
I beleive we did the right thing, you beleive we did the wrong thing, its just a matter of opinion.
However I am upset at the way we have conducted the war, we should have went in and finished it and been home by now.
As it stands right we cant just up and leave because Iran would invade Iraq at the first oppurtunity.
None of your post has explained what Clinton did to improve the economy and what Bush has done to ruin it.
So I'm guessing you agree with Albright, and it doesn't matter. You buy right into the bi-partisianship, while your side gives their side everything it asks for.
FYI, I caucused for the only guy who would have ended the war, so eat beans, buddy. Those deaths bother me, enough to want to end it, not talk about ending it.
I know how Ron Paul would have ended the war, how does your messiah plan to get our troops out ?
We've been to Iraq several times Rev, which of those times are you speaking of? The hand shaking times or the bombing times, maybe the pre Saddam times before *we started supporting his murderous regime? Can you narrow it down some?
*I say we but I mean the handful of elite who profit from all these partnerships with tyrants and terrorists and military interventions.
I agree and you have a good point here, I also fault Clinton for NAFTA. In fact, if I remember right Hillary acknowledged it was a mistake during he campaigning...
I didn't list Clinton and NAFTA because that was not what the OP asked. Remember, I am neither Democrat or Republican. I vote for who I think is best in each election so don't think I pull punches on either side of the isle. I think the truth is the truth and both parties have much to be ashamed of.
More than anything, I see this democratic house hasn't accomplished one thing so far. They have the vote, pass some laws that favor the people. Have you seen any yet...?
EDIT to ADD...
I forgot to say, you do make a good point about the war also. We went in with no real definition of victory and no plan to get out with our heads up high. This is why I felt we should have waited on Nato, then that country without a government would would be the worlds problem and not just ours...