An Amillennial Timeline leading up to the end

And you say you're NOT presenting pret garbage?????????????????????????????????

From the Wikipedia article on partial preterism:

Your horse feathers isn't a bit different from the partial prets !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

See my last post!

 

This is not Amillennialism.

 

It's been a while and so I thought I would pop over to see and this is the first thread I landed on. And it reminds me of why I stay away, lack of comprehension skills.

 

But your amillenialist stuff is identical to the pret stuff! Both are garbage.

 

You have similarities too. But your message is different and so is mine. That's what makes the difference.

 

MY message is that BOTH ARE FALSE, no matter whatcha call them.

 

You are the one who cannot back your claims with direct quotes from scripture.

 

WHAT claims?

I posted the Scriptures indicating the millenuim. Seems YOU have some explaining to do, as to how you can just ignore those passages & say there'll be no "millenium" ! !

 

You have no direct quotes from the gospels or epistles. Revelation is a book of symbols. The 1000 years of Revelation 20 = the binding of Satan, not the kingdom. Satan attacks the kingdom when the 1000 years come to a close.

 

Then, the kingdom will have been here for 1K years. How difficult is that to understand? The Scriptures I posted make that fact clear.

 

The 1000 years represents the binding of Satan. If it represents the kingdom, the kingdom would not exist at the end of the 1000 years.

 

You have to deny hoistory and scripture to see AD 70 as being the Great tribulation event, and when was the Antichrist, who did miracles signs and wonders then?

 

Or...you would have to deny history and Scripture to not see how the tribulation described in the Olivet Discourse was fulfilled exactly as Jesus described it in the Jewish Wars leading up to the events of AD 70. Are there specific signs and wonders you were referring to from "the Antichrist"? As a side note, I don't believe there is such a person. Do you mean the Beast from the Sea, the Man of Sin, the False Prophet, or someone else?

 

If you look for what the symbols represent you can see Revelations prophecies fulfilled time and again in history. Jesus said they would shortly come to pass. But if we ignore this and stop looking at history and the present, expecting the symbols to appear in the distant future, we miss the entire message.

 

Man of Sin and final Antichrist had not yet arrived when Bible was authored!

 

I see someone like Nero as a type of the yet to come Antichrist, as some of revelation happened in first century, but much still future to us!

 

That's why they call it prophecy. It was to shortly come to pass. John says the spirit of Antichrist was already here.

 

Revelation recapitulates according to the oldest commentary found on the book. And we can see the mark of the beast reoccurring throughout history. With more to come. But I believe most has been fulfilled and Jesus could return today.

 

But not yet the final Antichrist!