franklinmonroe
Active Member
Do you still stand behind this statement, Pastor Bob?Pastor_Bob said:... Nor did the human authors of the autographa at the time they were writing them...
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Do you still stand behind this statement, Pastor Bob?Pastor_Bob said:... Nor did the human authors of the autographa at the time they were writing them...
Are you convinced that Joshua was completely unaware that what he recorded were inspired words from the Lord? Are you persuaded that Joshua believed that what he wrote was his own ordinary prose, 'unispired' and without authority directly from the mouth of God?Pastor_Bob said:... Nor did the human authors of the autographa at the time they were writing them...
Why are these extra qualifiers tacked on now? The original question was about the authors knowing (or not) if their writings were inspired; it never was about preservation. I do believe that Joshua knew that his recording of God's commands to Him were not his words alone, but were at that very moment a special revelation (inspired, if you will).Pastor_Bob said:So, you believe that Joshua knew that his recording of God's commands to Him would be inspired, preserved Scripture that would endure from that generation forever and be used by God's people from that point until the end of the world as we know it?
Although I will not try to answer this for Pastor_Bob, I will offer the following: Because it is the emphatic truth.franklinmonroe said:Why are these extra qualifiers tacked on now?
Would you be willing to read this over again and consider what you have said?The original question was about the authors knowing (or not) if their writings were (not "would be") inspired; it never was about preservation.
Just before he penned them down as he had just pondered the intent of the One who Inspired him.I do believe that Joshua knew that his recording of God's commands to Him were not his words alone, but were at that very moment a special revelation (inspired, if you will). When did you think they became inspired?
The Psalms and other passages that speak of preservation had not yet been written. We don't know what Joshua's expectation would have been about the longevity of his writings. However, Joshua did have the writings of Moses and Joshua's early verses allude directly to Moses words (Deuteronomy 9:5, KJV) --
Not for thy righteousness, or for the uprightness of thine heart, dost thou go to possess their land: but for the wickedness of these nations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee, and that he may perform the word which the LORD sware unto thy fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
Would endurance and preservation mean the same as if they could be separated completely from each other in definition?Joshua had the promise that God would be with him as God had been with Moses; I think Joshua thought his words from the Lord would endure, just as the words Moses had received were remembered (Joshua 1:13, KJV) --
Remember the word which Moses the servant of the LORD commanded you, saying, The LORD your God hath given you rest, and hath given you this land.
Ah! The preservation of God's very words given in this example by Franklin Monroe in his effort to prove otherwise!:applause:I think that Joshua would have thought that Deuteronomy 4:2 applied to his book --
Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.And you know that not every one of God's words was recorded by humans; nor was it all intended to be preserved for us today.