• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Anthony Weiner?

Status
Not open for further replies.

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Could you elaborate? I may need to withdraw and apologize for my comment about you disliking Jews, but I need more information.

I'll briefly elaborate. In my former life, I've witnessed firsthand their cohesiveness/cooperation/diligence as a group, and their subsequent gravitation into positions of authority within bureaucracies ; all done very quietly on their part. I believe most Americans fail to realize, or are indifferent to, the extent of control that they actually have in many areas. I'm NOT indifferent to it; in fact it alarms me. But then again I don't view them as The Chosen Ones either. I suspect many here on the BB do.

Heheh, no need to apologize Paul, I'm probably just gonna offend your senses with something else on down the road. :)
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
Men do stupid things when they meet attractive women. Big fat hairy deal.

We have a country to save.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hypocrisy.

It's as much of a crime as that recently committed by a republican politician for doing the same type of thing.

The difference is in the way they handle it.

Republican owns up and takes action. Liberal denies, lies , and dissembles.

Your willingness to excuse all the above is ...interesting, to say the least.

I'm not excusing it, IF HE DID IT. It's not criminal activity, i.e. it's not a crime.

As Bro. Curtis says, Weiner's an idiot, let's move on to substantial issues.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm not excusing it, IF HE DID IT. It's not criminal activity, i.e. it's not a crime.

As Bro. Curtis says, Weiner's an idiot, let's move on to substantial issues.

OK

So start another thread.

This one is on topic. No one made you participate.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theti...ony-weiner-wont-deny-lewd-photo-is-of-himself

Rep. Anthony Weiner won’t deny lewd photo is of himself

After spending days trying to brush aside reporter inquiries about a lewd photo that was sent Friday from his Twitter account, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) on Wednesday prompted further speculation about the incident by failing to deny that the photo was of himself.

"I didn't send the picture out," Weiner told MSNBC's Luke Russert in a televised interview.
"That's not a picture of you?"
"You know, I can't say with certitude. My system was hacked. Pictures can be manipulated. Pictures can be dropped in and inserted," Weiner replied. You can watch video of the exchange above.

Russert later suggested the congressman likely would remember taking a photo of himself in his underwear, to which Weiner responded "one of the reasons we've asked an Internet security firm to come in is to see maybe if something was manipulated, maybe something was dropped in."

Russert followed up by asking if the congressman will flat-out deny the picture is of himself. "I will say that we're trying to figure out exactly what happened here. Whether a photograph was manipulated that was found in my account, whether something was dropped in to my account."


Liar, liar, pants on fire.

A liberal never admits he's a liar, even when caught red handed.
 

FR7 Baptist

Active Member
My verdict: Not Guilty

Here's why- the metadata from the photo doesn't match that of other photos on his Twitter and the woman who Mr. Weiner allegedly sent it to says she had never met him. It seems very unlikely he would post a photo of his wiener publicly on Twitter for the world to see from his congressional Twitter account even if he were involved in sexual shenanigans. Obviously I can't say 100% he didn't do it, but the evidence doesn't add up to say he did.
 

mandym

New Member
My verdict: Not Guilty

Here's why- the metadata from the photo doesn't match that of other photos on his Twitter and the woman who Mr. Weiner allegedly sent it to says she had never met him. It seems very unlikely he would post a photo of his wiener publicly on Twitter for the world to see from his congressional Twitter account even if he were involved in sexual shenanigans. Obviously I can't say 100% he didn't do it, but the evidence doesn't add up to say he did.

His reaction to the whole thing bring it all into question. He is feeling guilty about something. And his claim that his account was hacked is a serious problem given he is a congressman. Yet he wants to just dismiss the whole thing. His story does not add up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
It has been suggested that if he contacted law enforcement - then some other things may come to light.

and the questions asked by the media were very straight and simple to answer. He simply beat around the bush. Either (a)he never had his picture taken as supposed or (b) someone has taken a picture of him in his skivvies. So Congressman, which one is the most correct answer - a or b ?
 

rbell

Active Member
My verdict: Not Guilty

Here's why- the metadata from the photo doesn't match that of other photos on his Twitter and the woman who Mr. Weiner allegedly sent it to says she had never met him. It seems very unlikely he would post a photo of his wiener publicly on Twitter for the world to see from his congressional Twitter account even if he were involved in sexual shenanigans. Obviously I can't say 100% he didn't do it, but the evidence doesn't add up to say he did.

Wait a minute...

The guy refuses to say whether or not that was a picture of him (!).

Why on earth would you keep lewd photos of yourself on your own computer--unless you were going to send them to people?

Your partisanship has clouded your judgment in this particular case.


Also, keep in mind how Weiner engaged in insults and name-calling when the reporters were asking him questions about this escapade. Not exactly behavior indicative of innocence, IMHO.

But the big problem comes back to his steadfast refusal to say, "those pictures aren't me." And if they are...then it's fairly clear as to why he has them. Maybe he didn't plan on sending them via Twitter...but he was going to send them to some of his "groupies."
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
All In The Family

An email I got this morn perked my interest in his other half (I'd consider them still to be 'newly weds'), who happens to be a strikingly beautiful and elegant woman. Hillary is [likely] counciling her now from her own experiences.

(04-02-2007) Hillary’s Mystery Woman: Who Is Huma?
http://www.observer.com/2007/hillary-s-mystery-woman-who-huma

(07-11-2010) Queens Rep. Anthony Weiner marries Huma Abedin, with Former President Bill Clinton presiding
http://articles.nydailynews.com/201...ding-spot-state-hillary-clinton-longtime-aide

(06-07-2011) Huma Abedin is not a typical congressional wife
http://articles.cnn.com/2011-06-07/...n-state-hillary-clinton-weiner?_s=PM:POLITICS

(06-09-2011) Sources: Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner’s wife, is pregnant
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56555.html

(06-12-2011) Hillary Clinton takes Weiner's wife, Huma Abedin, under her wing
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...n-under-her-wing/story-e6frg6so-1226073923266
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top