Boehner folds again: Vote on 'clean' debt-ceiling bill scheduled

[thisnumbersdisconnected]

Fox News: Boehner blinks, says House to vote on 'clean' debt-limit hike​

WASHINGTON – House Speaker John Boehner, in an abrupt shift, announced Tuesday that the House would vote on an increase in the nation's borrowing cap without any strings attached.

A senior House GOP leadership source told Fox News that the vote is expected Tuesday night, with lawmakers trying to beat the impending snowstorm.

Boehner's decision to proceed with a "clean" debt-ceiling bill amounts to a capitulation by Republicans to President Obama and Capitol Hill Democrats who argued that the GOP should not attempt to use the bill as leverage to extract concessions from the administration. Conservative groups quickly condemned the decision, voicing concern that Congress would let the cap continue to rise above its current $17.3 trillion level without anything in return.

The key phrase of the story highlighted. Webster's says, "Capitulate: cease to resist an opponent or an unwelcome demand; surrender." Boehner makes claims later in the linked article that he'll "put up enough GOP votes" to get the bill passed and give "his party" as Boehner says the debt ceiling increase they want with no strings attached. Why on Earth would he want to do that? It's asinine. Fox News analysts state they don't believe the Speaker can get the votes gathered to pass the bill even if he wants it to go through. That's the only glimmer we've got.

We've got a spineless party leadership giving the nation away as fast as the Marxist Democrats can destroy it. Can anyone say words like "secede," "revolt," "Constitutional convention"? It's time. We've had enough.

 

[poncho]

Fox News: Boehner blinks, says House to vote on 'clean' debt-limit hike​

The key phrase of the story highlighted. Webster's says, "Capitulate: cease to resist an opponent or an unwelcome demand; surrender."

We've got a spineless party giving the nation away as fast as the Marxist Democrats can destroy it. Can anyone say words like "secede," "revolt," "Constitutional convention"? It's time. We've had enough.

Now now TND calm down and think about what you just said for a minute.

If you were to "revolt" you'd have to face off against the very soviet style militarized police force you're always defending.

Hey, let me know when and where you decide to "revolt" I wanna get the look on your face posted to youtube after all your police state buddies turn against you. :thumbs:

 

[thisnumbersdisconnected]

blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

Go osculate yourself. :thumbsup:

 

[InTheLight]

Yep, Boehner caves again. Next up: Unemployment Benefits Extension.

 

[poncho]

Go osculate yourself. :thumbsup:

Kind of gave you a different perspective on your beloved soviet style militarized police state huh?

 

[InTheLight]

Kind of gave you a different perspective on your beloved soviet style militarized police state huh?

Attempt to derail thread (AGAIN) is noted.

 

[thisnumbersdisconnected]

Kind of gave you a different perspective on your beloved soviet style militarized police state huh?

No, tired of your cheesy, idiotic efforts to demonize the U.S. and derail any thread that forwards ideas you have no love for. I'm tired of your total lack of concept of what it is to have served this country, either in the armed forces or in the police forces of this nation. Your hatred of police officers is anti-Christian, anti-social, and anti-American. In short, Poncho, in case you're not getting the message, I don't like you or what you claim to stand for, but that doesn't mean I don't love you. Have a wonderful life, and please, may Christ find you.

 

[poncho]

No, tired of your cheesy, idiotic efforts to demonize the U.S. and derail any thread that forwards ideas you have no love for. I'm tired of your total lack of concept of what it is to have served this country, either in the armed forces or in the police forces of this nation. Your hatred of police officers is anti-Christian, anti-social, and anti-American. In short, Poncho, in case you're not getting the message, I don't like you or what you claim to stand for, but that doesn't mean I don't love you. Have a wonderful life, and please, may Christ find you.

So in other words you don't like me because I know the difference between serving my country and the global bankers and corporations?

Naw, I think you don't like me because you know I'm right and that everything you stand for and defend is what is killing this country. May Christ open your eyes to the truth.

 

[poncho]

Attempt to derail thread (AGAIN) is noted.

So report me. There's only ten thousand boring threads about democrats vs republicans every month.

While your at it report all these threads that say the same thing over and over and over and over . . .

 

[InTheLight]

So report me. There's only ten thousand boring threads about democrats vs republicans every month.

While your at it report all these threads that say the same thing over and over and over and over . . .

Let's see....you want me to report the threads that you've derailed and also the threads that say the same thing over and over again--like "old political party paradigm", "corporate Wall Street banksters", "illegal Federal Reserve", "multi-national corporatism", "genetically modified organisms", "Goldman Sachs candidate", "militant police stateism", "Faux Snews", "Council of Foreign Relations is the real State Department", etc. etc....why, I could be kept busy all day long!

 

[poncho]

Let's see....you want me to report the threads that you've derailed and also the threads that say the same thing over and over again--like "old political party paradigm", "corporate Wall Street banksters", "illegal Federal Reserve", "multi-national corporatism", "genetically modified organisms", "Goldman Sachs candidate", "militant police stateism", "Faux Snews", "Council of Foreign Relations is the real State Department", etc. etc....why, I could be kept busy all day long!

You could always resort to your old underhanded personal attack tricks if you prefer.

Must be rough on you establishment shill types now that the truth is spreading faster than you can keep up with but hey you gave it a good go for awhile. :smilewinkgrin:

 

[InTheLight]

You could always resort to your old underhanded personal attack tricks if you prefer.

Must be rough on your establishment shill types now that the truth is spreading faster than you keep up with. Hey, you gave it a good go though.

Could you please provide a link to one or two of these so-called personal attacks? I don't believe I've ever made one on a BB.

 

[poncho]

Could you please provide a link to one or two of these so-called personal attacks? I don't believe I've ever made one on a BB.

Oh please. I don't believe even your memory is that short.

Who's derailing the thread now?

 

[thisnumbersdisconnected]

Could you please provide a link to one or two of these so-called personal attacks? I don't believe I've ever made one on a BB.

I don't believe you have either. But Ponch is the type that if he can't get your goat with his pseudo-facts, he'll just slap you. Great debate tactic, huh?

 

[InTheLight]

Oh please. I don't believe even your memory is that short.

I've got a great memory. I just don't remember making a personal attack against you. I certainly never called you a coward like you've called me when I had you on Ignore. I never said you carried out cowardly ambushes, like you accused me of doing.

So, please point me to one of these personal attacks I've made on you. If it only requires a short memory you should find one in a snap.

 

[poncho]

I've got a great memory. I just don't remember making a personal attack against you. I certainly never called you a coward like you've called me when I had you on Ignore. I never said you carried out cowardly ambushes, like you accused me of doing.

So, please point me to one of these personal attacks I've made on you. If it only requires a short memory you should find one in a snap.

No problem I'll list em all for ya.

Let's start right here the day and hour you put me on your ignore list. 03-06-2011, 07:59 PM

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1655972&postcount=60

Should be fairly easy to find every one of your bushwacking attacks from this point.

Hey remember this one?

Both of you (and everyone on BB, actually) would be best served by putting Poncho in your killfile (Ignore List.) That way you won't see his outlandish twaddle.

But you'll still be able to attack me personally while I'm on your (ignore list) right?

Might take a couple days but I will find every personal attack you waged against me while I was on your (ignore list). :thumbs:


This is funny. Remember this one?

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1839815&postcount=4

5. No trolling. Trolling consists of provoking large volumes of responses by posting absurdities, deliberately offensive insults, etc. ITL 05-02-2012, 09:13 AM

Apparently you were aware of what constitutes trolling and that it is against the rules to engage in trolling, but . . .

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1837276&postcount=6

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1837279&postcount=7

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1864292&postcount=2

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1893398&postcount=13

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1899054&postcount=3

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1901653&postcount=2

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1901745&postcount=6

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1901774&postcount=9

http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=1901780&postcount=11

That's enough for tonight. I'll post some more later. Haven't got to the really good ones yet.

 

[Revmitchell]

Guys get over yourselves and stop dragging this thread off topic.

 

[InTheLight]

No problem I'll list em all for ya.

Let's start right here the day and hour you put me on your ignore list. 03-06-2011, 07:59 PM

Putting someone on Ignore is not a personal attack.

But you'll still be able to attack me personally while I'm on your (ignore list) right?

Is there a law or a board rule that says a person cannot comment on a thread started or posted to by someone on one's Ignore list?

Might take a couple days but I will find every personal attack you [ waged against me while I was on your (ignore list). :thumbs:

And how would you know how long I had you on Ignore? I think it was 3 weeks or so. And quit playing the victim card.

This is funny. Remember this one?

Is that all you got?

 

[Revmitchell]

Fox News: Boehner blinks, says House to vote on 'clean' debt-limit hike​

The key phrase of the story highlighted. Webster's says, "Capitulate: cease to resist an opponent or an unwelcome demand; surrender." Boehner makes claims later in the linked article that he'll "put up enough GOP votes" to get the bill passed and give "his party" as Boehner says the debt ceiling increase they want with no strings attached. Why on Earth would he want to do that? It's asinine. Fox News analysts state they don't believe the Speaker can get the votes gathered to pass the bill even if he wants it to go through. That's the only glimmer we've got.

We've got a spineless party leadership giving the nation away as fast as the Marxist Democrats can destroy it. Can anyone say words like "secede," "revolt," "Constitutional convention"? It's time. We've had enough.

All Rhino's like Boehner need to go.

 

[poncho]

Putting someone on Ignore is not a personal attack.

Nope.

Is there a law or a board rule that says a person cannot comment on a thread started or posted to by someone on one's Ignore list?

There's a rule against trolling. And you knew that when you engaged in it, behind your ignore button.

And how would you know how long I had you on Ignore?

I can remember when you "allegedly" took me off your ignore list. I'll find that date too.

I think it was 3 weeks or so.

I believe it was more like 6 or 8 months. We'll see.

And quit playing the victim card.

When you quit lying.

Is that all you got?

Not by a long shot. :smilewinkgrin: