• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

CAL: Graffiti? Punish the HOMEOWNERS!

rbell

Active Member
Boy, It's obvious where the people who are too stupid to be in charge of stuff go...

...they go to California, and get elected to public office!!

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54833

Instead of cracking down on "graffiti artists" (that means thug who defaces property)...they are punishing homeowners.

Maybe California should review Texas laws regarding property rights. It seems that they aren't having this probelm in that State...
 

rbell

Active Member
I thought one of the comments was pertinent...

...all you people in California. It is stupidity like this that has ruined your state. Now, thousands of you are moving to Colorado. Please stay in California. You made the bed with your idiotic liberal policies, now lie in it.
Thirty years with a left-wing state legislature and the once great state of CA has been reduced to a third world sewer.
 

Johnv

New Member
A couple of things. First, the link in the OP has nothing to do with graffiti. Second, it's not a state law, it's an ordinance in the City of Los Angeles. Third, there's nothing to suggest they aren't going after taggers (in fact, the LAPD has a tagging task force). Fourth, the ordinance requires property owners to remove graffiti within 7 days. Lastly, the current law allows a property owner to sue a tagger for the cost of removing the graffiti.
 

Johnv

New Member
Just to reiterate my previous post:
  • This isn't a state law, it's an local ordinance in the City of Los Angeles.
  • There's nothing to suggest they aren't going after taggers (in fact, the LAPD has a tagging task force).
  • The ordinance requires property owners to remove graffiti within 7 days.
  • The current law allows a property owner to sue a tagger for the cost of removing the graffiti.
So, what's the problem?
 
Top