BobRyan
Well-Known Member
1. Seems to me that the governors of Fla and Tx where a bit more pro-active prior to the storm hitting and the P.R. Governor was a bit more re-active in making sure rescue resources were pre-positioned to assist in the aftermath. They had at least 5 days to preposition large tanks of fresh water around the Island.
2. The million car exodus that you see from evacuation of FLA and Tx prior to the storm was not possible in P.R. due to the Island logistics.
3. The million truck re-entry of emergency equipment back into FLA and TX immediately after the storm was not possible in P.R. due to the Island logistics.
4. The Cat 5 hit that only decreases to Cat 3 or Cat 4 over P.R. is not what TX and FLA faced once full landfall was achieved -- so much more wind damage would be expected in the P.R. scenario.
5. No mountains in FLA or TX to facilitate mud-slide-destruction of houses and roads.
6. No fully functional and massive ancillary network of cell towers, power grids etc "next to" P.R. affected areas
P.R. needed the "island version" of sheltering and prepositioning resources and equipment. Either underground bunkers slightly inland, caves, with a plan to clear-roads-first then release the armada of emergency vehicles. I doubt they even had such infrastructure.
Everyone else in the mainline could just "drive the trucks out of harms way and come back immediately after the storm". Not an option on the island if you don't create your own version of "Drive away".
==============================================
So then we might "expect" a slower recovery where some areas get immediate help and others are lagging. Plenty of room for media to rush to one of the lagging areas and cry wolf. Still I would hope they can air lift massive sized containers of fresh water all across the Island.
2. The million car exodus that you see from evacuation of FLA and Tx prior to the storm was not possible in P.R. due to the Island logistics.
3. The million truck re-entry of emergency equipment back into FLA and TX immediately after the storm was not possible in P.R. due to the Island logistics.
4. The Cat 5 hit that only decreases to Cat 3 or Cat 4 over P.R. is not what TX and FLA faced once full landfall was achieved -- so much more wind damage would be expected in the P.R. scenario.
5. No mountains in FLA or TX to facilitate mud-slide-destruction of houses and roads.
6. No fully functional and massive ancillary network of cell towers, power grids etc "next to" P.R. affected areas
P.R. needed the "island version" of sheltering and prepositioning resources and equipment. Either underground bunkers slightly inland, caves, with a plan to clear-roads-first then release the armada of emergency vehicles. I doubt they even had such infrastructure.
Everyone else in the mainline could just "drive the trucks out of harms way and come back immediately after the storm". Not an option on the island if you don't create your own version of "Drive away".
==============================================
So then we might "expect" a slower recovery where some areas get immediate help and others are lagging. Plenty of room for media to rush to one of the lagging areas and cry wolf. Still I would hope they can air lift massive sized containers of fresh water all across the Island.
Last edited: