I did not call you a liar. I said I had grave doubts. That leaves a possibility that you were telling the truth. These are strange times we are living in and with Trump's very hate-filled campaign he has successfully let loose and emboldened evil on both sides. Both sides should oppose all hate and all hate filled acts by all people regardless of their political affiliation. Do you agree?
If you had said people were carrying or wearing such signs I would have immediately known you were telling the truth. I assumed, and you know what danger is it to assume, that you meant signs planted in the ground.
They're probably thinking since Trump's people don't have a problem with his sexual predation and raping a 13 year old with Epstein, and his detractors are carrying rape Melania signs, that both camps are equally disgusting. It's not a story if everybody is okay with doing it.
Again, NONE of that has been approved by Trump, nor ANY Christian leader supported it...
While Black lives and the rioting has had support from the anti Trump crowd, heck. Mayor of San Fran himself stated that he would be among those doing that stuff, as he was against what happened!
So those doing and saying bad things for Trump NOT approved, but those doing for other side have full approval!
IMO, "don't have a problem..." does not describe many (most?) who voted for Trump.
They DO have problems with his conduct and language and some of his positions, but have bigger problems with HRC's character and, more importantly, with much of what she would likely do as President.
My view is that each had so many undesirable aspects that I could not vote for neither. (though I did vote.)
Trump encouraged it with his inflammatory words during the campaign. You really do not believe the KKK would have endorsed him if they did not see that he was encouraging them? Give me a break please.
No, it is true. He incited violence, suggested violence if he lost, incited hate toward any who opposed him. He ran the most hate filled campaign in our history. He is appointing men who are sympathetic toward white supremacists.
We are in for a very bad time.
You are just incapable of recognizing the truth on the issue.
However, Name those men that are "sympathetic toward white supremicists"
and provide proof that your allegations are true.
Provide the quotes where Trump "incited violence" and incited" hate".
And then explain why, in your mind, an endorsement by the KKK makes Trump a racist, while Hillary's acceptance of
donations from terrorists doesn't make her a terrorist.
Then you can explain Hillary's hate filled campaign and why you think it was OK for her to call 25% of the electorate "deplorables" and wink at the violence of demonstrators done in her name.
Like she is doing right now.
Under Bannon’s Leadership, Breitbart Openly Embraced The White Supremacist Alt-Right.Andrew Breitbart despised racism. Truly despised it. He used to brag regularly about helping to integrate his fraternity at Tulane University. He insisted that racial stories be treated with special care to avoid even the whiff of racism. With Bannon embracing Trump, all that changed. Now Breitbart has become the alt-right go-to website, with Yiannopoulos pushing white ethno-nationalism as a legitimate response to political correctness, and the comment section turning into a cesspool for white supremacist mememakers.
And then explain why, in your mind, an endorsement by the KKK makes Trump a racist, while Hillary's acceptance of
donations from terrorists doesn't make her a terrorist.
Then you can explain Hillary's hate filled campaign and why you think it was OK for her to call 25% of the electorate "deplorables" and wink at the violence of demonstrators done in her name.
Like she is doing right now.[/QUOTE]
Would the KKK ehndorse a person who is not in sympathy of their goals. I don't think so.
There is no defense for Hillary's comment calling people people deplorable.
Do you want all people to have equal rights or are some groups more equal that others?
Including endorsing former klan member Robert Byrd, whom Hillary adored.
With that association, she is a lot closer to being a racist than Trump.
The truth is that neither of them is.
But I understand you dilemma.
That's all you've got.
Poor guy.[emoji45]
It's very true. And there's no surprise that the folks like him would think that the rest of the world is stupid enough to think that Trump wasn't egging his supporters on to do what they did.[emoji57]
Yep. Everything you said is correct. Keep on telling the truth and don't let their attempts to rewrite the history of that man's very public incendiary behavior go unchecked.
His level of disgusting seems to continue to receive affirmation from the "I voted for the platform"types.
Clinton's State Department awarded Planned Parenthood $26 million of foreign-aid funds. If you surmise that 25% of that money went to abortions, at approximately $300/procedure, it comes to 21,667 abortions world-wide. PP has stated that approximately 10% of their funding goes towards abortions; so that drops the number to about 8,667. There's your range of how many unborn humans were murdered.
It would be easy to quibble about "she didn't actually murder them herself"; but then again, Hitler never actually murdered any Jews himself, did he? He just put the policies in place and made sure there was funding for it.