Democrats And Illegals

That's what I think is the best approach. What is your idea?

 

LOL. How can you continue to respond like that and not be inviting scathing ad hominem?

 

Have no ideas?

 

How about just following the Constitution and using the Electoral College as it is now? It worked for Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter and Barak Obama. The best approach is the one we already have and as worked perfectly as long as we have had it.

You're Exhibit "A" of why we cannot allow Democrats to ever get their hands on the levers of power any longer. All you guys come up with are loopy ideas and nothing of substance.

 

It would b e nice if you understood the constitution. But that's not required to be a Trumpite. In fact the dumber the better.

 

I do understand the Constitution, which is why your ideas are so unworkable and why no sane person would or could be a Democrat. It requires a hatred of America and a hatred for our Constitution. Why don't you go live in Venezuela for a while and see how socialism works for you?

 

This is 777 pointing out that you are completely contradicting yourself in what you are arguing for.

This is you saying that contradicting yourself is the best approach to argument, then inviting commentary on it.

This is me asking how you can say such things and not expect serious personal criticism.

This is you asking if I have any ideas about your illogical approach and/or why you continue in that vein.

And this is me responding to your query:
Several, not all competing, but none particularly charitable, unless… No, I’m not going to say it.

 

Should this ever miraculously come to pass, the debt could be paid off in 6 months, revenue would rise so dramatically that we could get back to what I remember my parents saying: “Maxie has such a good job that he pays income tax.”

 

The constitution is a living document. It has been amended 27 times. Proposing a new one is perfectly acceptable. If it isn't supported, fine.

 

You do not understand what a "living document" is. The amendment process in fact proves it is not a living document. You need to go study what it is you are talking about.

 

The electors can vote for whoever they want to vote for and have done that in the past.
Everything you need to know about the Electoral College

There is no Constitutional provision or federal law that requires electors to vote for whom they are pledged. Twenty-six states and D.C., however, bind their electors to vote for their promised candidates. People who vote for someone other than for whom they are pledged are known as “faithless electors” and they’ve never decided a presidential election. “Faithless electors” are rare, with only one in each of the 1948, 1956, 1960, 1968, 1972, 1976 and 1988 elections.