I think the recent poll about the Designated Hitter hit a foul ball with an answer misstated, and perhaps was not as complete as it might have been for validity. So here is another At Bat for that one.
DH or no DH—that is the question
Discussion in 'Sports Forum' started by Alcott, Jul 2, 2010.
?
-
Leave it as it is—it’s up to each league to have it or not
1 vote(s)16.7% -
Do away with it—the circumstances that led to it are no longer valid
2 vote(s)33.3% -
It’s the right thing as a pitcher’s value is based solely on pitching
1 vote(s)16.7% -
It’s no good—strategical dilemmas become automatic non-decisions
2 vote(s)33.3% -
Good idea—helps a pitcher from being abused by the opposition
1 vote(s)16.7% -
It’s no good—every player should take his turn at bat or leave the game
3 vote(s)50.0% -
It is needed to be sure a pitcher cannot be ‘avenged’—thrown at
0 vote(s)0.0% -
As a starting pitcher must go 5 innings to get win, limit DH to first 5 innings
0 vote(s)0.0% -
Excuse pitcher from batting by having a batting order of 8, with no DH
1 vote(s)16.7% -
Don’t know…don’t care… what’s all the fuss?
0 vote(s)0.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
-
-
Do away with it, every player should take their turn at bat or leave the game and it takes away a lot of the strategy.
-
Thanks for pinch hitting for me! :thumbsup:
Salty