Every discussion in this forum ends up attacking the KJV and anyone you call "KJVO".
I've been a strict observer in this thread up until now. Your statement is patently false. I just went through this entire thread again. There isn't a single post that attacks the KJV. There are, however, numerous posts that attack KJVOism.
Jesus used what would eventually become the KJV thus he used the KJV
I will assume you're referring to the presumption that Jesus used Masoritic-type texts in his scriptural references (which is debatable, given that the Masoretes conducted their scribing between the 7th and 11th centuries). By your reckoning, Jesus used what would eventually become the Bishop's, Geneva, Tyndale, KJV, NKJV, ASV, Coverdale, Darby, Douay Rhiems, Quaker, RSV, ESV, Webster's, WYclif, and CEV Bibles.
Jesus still uses the KJV, or are you, I said, ARE YOU! saying the KJV isnt the word of God?
There's no scriptural support for the concept that Jesus uses a particular translation.