What gives twitter, facebook, google, etc. the right to ban whatever they deem objectionable, without consequence? How much are we willing to take? The left wants total thought control. Education. MSM. Your healthcare. The streets. The cops. Now the internet. How long before they want us to pony up our homes & possessions? Just a thought. I think I’ve seen this movie before, & it doesn’t end well for the people.
Pure censorship to appease the Chinese Communist Party--CCP.
The Nigerian doctor in the photo mentions her experience with HCQ in Nigeria.
My Nigerian Christian friend tells me that he is also very familiar with HCQ because it is widely used in Nigeria for malaria
among other things.
I tell him that Mohammed says that drinking camel urine cures everything.
The nightly news trashed this doctor as incompetent, who believes in demons, then brought on Fauci who again said Hydroxychloroquine has no positive benefit to covid patients and this has been proven by countless studies, and the FDA properly is saying it can not be used as a
covid treatment.
Unless the democrats lose bigtime in fall 2020 elections, that drug's
suppression will continue. If democrats lose the house and POTUS, then Trump has a better mandate to kick political hacks and quacks to the curb.
Private business does what it wills. Stop using their product and create a competitive alternative and you'll see them change their mind.
What is the Christian alternative to Facebook or Twitter? Oh yeah...the Baptist Board! (That's gotta be 30 bonus points off my demerit badge) :Wink
1. Physicians are not getting their medical advice from Twitter, YouTube or Facebook.
2. As with most drugs there are benefits and risks. With this particular drug there are some significant risks which need to be evaluated individually by competent practitioners.
3. Social Media has become a platform for spreading opinion rather than news. The public is unable to distinguish the difference and is being mislead by a variety of media corporations.
Maybe you should define terms so we know exactly what you are saying.
Americans are reading that pharmacists at CVS are refusing to honor doctors' prescriptions.
and Americans have seen Michigan and Nevada forbid the use of HCQ in defiance of the FDA.
Apparently, the UAW is telling their members not to take HCQ.
But then we read that Dr. Didier Raoult says that it is safe and effective.
So why should the Masters of the Universe try to shut down public debate about medical treatment?
Maybe you should define terms so we know exactly what you are saying.
Americans are reading that pharmacists at CVS are refusing to honor doctors' prescriptions.
and Americans have seen Michigan and Nevada forbid the use of HCQ in defiance of the FDA.
Apparently, the UAW is telling their members not to take HCQ.
But then we read that Dr. Didier Raoult says that it is safe and effective.
So why should the Masters of the Universe try to shut down public debate about medical treatment?
Actually, they are.
That's why doctors are complaining.
HCQ, safer than asprin, tylonol, Advil, over the counter is most countries, has become political and restricted.
Why?
Cuz the mob made it political through all the platforms you mention.
Big Pharma does not want you to have a cheap cure to the Chinese virus.
You know the communists/socialists/Democrats all have a big supply of HCQ while they are telling you that you are going to die for lack of a cure.