Your unbelieving neighbour is not as wicked as he can possibly be, since he hasn't murdered you yet.
Sin was not part of God's good creation, though it is of note that He pronounced it 'very good' and not perfect. Adam and Eve were made sinless, but defectable-- that is, they could fall.
Genesis 3:24; Psalm 14:1-3 etc.).
Indeed so (John 6:44). But Mark 10:26-27. 'And they were greatly astonished, saying among themselves, "Who then can be saved?" But Jesus looked at them and said, "With men it is impossible, but not with God; for with God all things are possible."'
Praise God for irresistible grace! :)
Does Love Require Free Will?
Discussion in 'Calvinism & Arminianism Debate' started by Mark Corbett, Jun 12, 2017.
Page 6 of 9
-
Martin Marprelate Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
Martin Marprelate Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Genesis 5:3. 'And Adam lived 130 years, and begot a son after his own likeness, after his image, and named him Seth.' -
-
Could Satan have touched Job without God giving him the authorization?
Utilyan, you are desperately forcing your man-made belief on the text.
Perhaps your version of God is not the God of the Bible. -
Apart from the work of the Spirit men will choose what is of human nature, and this will be a genuine free choice ("free will"). As God reveals Himself to man through the Spirit and in a supernatural way to those being saved, these men choose God (again, a genuine free choice..."free will"). But this is not a choice free from God's own work or influence.
The error here is that so many seem to think that if God reveals Himself to man in a way that is undeniable and therefore influences man's decision then men are deprived of a freedom to choose. This creates a false dichotomy As an example -. If I show you a painting and you are so impressed that you want to purchase that piece of artwork, have I therefore deprived you of your free will? Of course not. But at the same time, your will in this example is not uninfluenced by the painting itself. -
Therefore, there is no free will in the process of reconciliation. God either makes a person alive to God or they remain dead in their trespasses and sins.
It matters not whether a person chooses a ham sandwich or a cheeseburger. This changes not the spirit of a human. God will use both the regenerate and unregenerate to fulfill and accomplish his perfect will. -
I love God because He first loved me. And He loved me by sending His Son to die that I would have life and a life of spiritual abundance. I am the product of God's labor, created in Christ for good works which God has prepared beforehand that I should walk in them. And I freely choose to love God because of this redemptive work that He has accomplished in my life. -
No kidding that boundary is easily explained with why anyone is living and breathing right now compared to someone who does not exist who obviously cannot freely walk towards God.
Apart from God name one thing anyone can do at all.
. -
You made accusation of heresy I said show us when that happened, Show us where it first shows up.
Your entire defense is based on lies and false accusations. You make up what we believe then you make up accusations with no evidence.
Debating you is an enjoyable piece of cake. :Biggrin -
God has ordained for the entire internet to tell you that is so stupid!
So if the internet says you are an idiot, does that mean God ordains that you are an idiot!? NO IT DOES NOT.
And My version of God? like I get a pick?
What do you mean perhaps?
Here is my version. He still would be 100% efficiently better then your whiny god.
My version of God is Jabba the Hutt.
-
I agree that the result of this act of God's is a response of love and gratitude. That is effect, which results from the cause...that being God's effectual work of redemption. -
-
Your church teaches heresy. I showed it within your own catechism. You continue with more blah, blah, blah... -
A simple yes or no will suffice. -
-
Saul/Paul was saved in spite of his will to persecute and kill Christians. God did not give Paul a choice on the road to Damascus. What we observe is the response of Paul immediately after God effectually chooses Paul. -
Hey is learning to read the last thing elect folks regenerate?
Read it again. Your reading comprehension is horrible.
It was GOD's IDEA to test Job. Satan did not request anything he is too slick, He twists the truth to how it is.
You see you keep making stuff up, That isn't even there! show me "Satan's request".
Did God ordain evil? No. what God did was righteous and perfect.
Everything God ordains is PERFECT and GOOD. God ordains all evil to be vanquished by good. But never has God been an architect and planned EVIL. -
You refuse to be honest with the text. Such is the lot of a person who is making his god in his own image. -
You can't half-ways say someone has free will.
Even Ananias right there in the same chapter is basicly like......well gee Lord you think saul is a good idea?
Think about it. He thinks has to let Jesus know who saul is, basicly questioning Jesus, we see Peter do it later too, And Jesus has to ask Saul why he is being percecuted.
"calvinist" - Jesus would have never put up with anything above^ He would shove his puppet hand up his saul puppet hole and be like.....oh yeah-yeah-yeah-yeah lets go Jesus lets do this!
Please.... -
Page 6 of 9